Silverwolf Loses His Election Bid: Hard Cheese

November 6, 2014

I lost my bid at elected office in the Land of Jefferson. Too bad. Hard cheese. I “garnered” just over 20,000 votes, and got a lot of the Libertarian platform and ideas I’ve been blogging about for the last seven years on this site into the public arena. My efforts  certainly didn’t seem to precipitate an earthquake or tsunami in American politics; not even an aftershock or Malibu breaker. But they did fulfill that perceived responsibility in myself to lay myself before the public in a manner probably more efficacious than this blog has been in effecting a radical revolution in America’s, and the World’s, political consciousness. In that, it has assuaged this nagging guilt at not precipitating myself at least once into the political arena. To have the right ideas and keep silent is a sin.

So, although I’ve lost my bid at elected office, and my electoral percentage of 1.4% is nothing to shout about, I have at least fulfilled that responsibility I felt for putting my views before the public.

Now it’s back to reality.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Why Not a Mercenary Army Contra Isis?

August 22, 2014

It seems to Silverwolf that the easiest and least controversial way to destroy ISIS is for the West, and the Islamic Nations of the East who oppose ISIS, to recruit a mercenary army of military veterans. This could be a coalition of anyone in the West and the other regions, who is appalled by ISIS’s murderous actions, and who has had military training. It would be especially valuable to have moderate Muslims in this force who want to repudiate the anti-Libertarian ideology of ISIS. If there were ever an ideology as opposite to Jefferson’s as is possible to be, it is ISIS’s, and its’ genocidal proponents need to be blasted from the face of the earth.

If the U.S. and the U.K.  had spent the fortunes they have wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan on a highly-motivated, pro-Jeffersonian, mercenary army, the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan might have been returned to the basic norms of human decency long ago, norms that we theoretically see in the Western “social democracies”. Those “democracies” are callous, brutal, and unloving societies, but they are at an infinitely-higher level than the kind of Nazi-like misery that ISIS is imposing on Yezidis, Christians, and Muslims. Those who shoot small children in the head, and behead journalists, need to be hoisted on their own petard.

A non-affiliated, mercenary army, would avoid the protests of the non-interventionists in America, who would stand by while genocide takes place and say it is none of our business. Their Libertarianism ends at the U.S. Borders.

A voluntary, mercenary army would also avoid any kind of coercion, or the situation of a person enlisting, hoping for a cushy desk job in America, but ending up on the frontlines in Iraq. All the fighters there would be there of their own volition, because they wanted to crush this Band of Murderers.

A Mercenary Army Contra ISIS is obviously the best, and most Libertarian solution, to the anti-Humanism of ISIS.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Uzis for French Jews: The Libertarian Solution

July 22, 2014

We warned long ago that Euro-Socialism would lead to racism, and racism where there is gun control leads to racist riots like the Jew-hater Riots in Paris we’ve just read about in the news. The Islamo-Nazi Jew-haters are free to riot in Paris, burning Jewish-owned shops and a synagogue, while the police refuse to gun them down, and the Jews are denied the inalienable Natural Right to defend themselves with guns. Do you think this would have happened if Jews were free to own Uzis in France?

Under Libertarian Law, you have the Right to defend yourself if any man or group of men assault your person or property. If France had followed Libertarian Law, there would have been dozens less racists infesting France after this riot than before.

The French Government, which has failed to protect Jews and has denied them the right to gun down those trying to murder them, should immediately issue an order that all Jews in France be permitted to own automatic and semi-automatic weapons like Uzis, and the Israeli Government should ship them there.

This is the final solution to Racist Nazi Property-Rights Criminals. The Libertarian Solution.

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

Silverwolf Wins His Primary Run: Watch Out, America

June 17, 2014

Much to his surprise, Silverwolf won the primary in which he ran, and now is a candidate for political office in America. Dang!

It is no understatement to say that the political establishment is shocked. Indeed, Silverwolf is shocked. He admits to feeling a trepidation at what his own rule would be like, and how Silverwolf would fare under his own domination.

Yet domination is the last thing a Libertarian would aim for. He seeks to liberate, and un-bind, from the thousand shackles that flesh is heir to when it lives under government.

You don’t necessarily need government to have order and law. The Irish didn’t have government, and many Native American Tribes didn’t have government, but they had a system of common law, and judges who could remember the common law, and how it had been used precedentally. They merely applied those precedential rulings to the case at hand, and since being ostracized from society in those primitive times meant virtual death, defendants would abide by the ruling of the judge, judges, or private court.

Since Silverwolf will now be campaigning until November, the bulk of his mental goulash shall go into his campaign posts, and not into this blog. But he shall, from time to time and if sufficiently moved by the subject, continue to contribute his Capitalist two Kopeks to the weighty political and social issues of the day.

It seems our campaign slogan, “Onward to Defeat”, has itself suffered defeat, and so we must now entertain the slogan “Backward to Victory!”.

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Jefferson Stabbed in the Back: the Supreme Court’s Prayer Ruling

May 6, 2014

Jefferson’s beautiful Libertarian Republic has once again been stabbed in the back, and this time fatally. The blade entered through the wedge created by the overthrow of the necessity of Separation of Church and State, one of the key ingredients in Jefferson’s prescription for Human Liberty.

This overthrow was engineered by five Catholics, imposing their will on a nation that is predominantly Protestant, and which was created by Christian Radicals, mostly Protestant, fleeing the Church-State tyrannies that dominated and enslaved Europe for so long. It was overthrown by a court that does not have one Protestant or Atheist sitting on its bench, in a country which is overwhelmingly Protestant, though they are fractured into hundreds of different sects. And this is called representative justice.

But even the three Jews and one Catholic who did try to defend those Protestants who agree with Jefferson that a Church-State connection is one of the first steps toward tyranny, — even they put up a feeble resistance, and did not touch on the real violations in this case which are Involuntary Servitude, and Theft of taxpayer’s monies.

Moreover, the Justices did not address the great divisiveness and factionalism which this heinous ruling will bring about, the hatred and aggression between members of local communities who never before really thought or cared that much about their neighbor’s views on organized religions.

During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Catholics burned Protestants alive for their religious views and writings. Protestants burned Catholics alive for their religious views and writings. Protestants burned other Protestants alive for their religious views and writings. Catholics burned other Catholics alive for their religious views and writings.

And then came the Libertarian American Revolution, led by Thomas Jefferson and Thom Paine. “Build up a Wall of Separation between Church and State”, wrote Wisechief Jefferson.

And tragically, yesterday, the emasculated Supreme Court overthrew that Wall of Separation that has made America a country where people of all religions, agnostics, and atheists, can trade and fulfill their commodity needs in a generally orderly fashion, without religous differences having any significant impact on their market behaviour.

And this heinous overthrow was backed by that disgrace in the White House who was put there with the backing of leading Liberal Democrats, like Alan Dershowitz and John Rothmann, and supposed Liberal defenders of Civil Rights like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ADL. They helped put this religous fanatic in the White House, and it will be everyone in America who is a true Jeffersonian Libertarian and truly religious, and who doesn’t want to have the Deity’s name in any way connected with such an immoral government, who will suffer.

Jefferson taught us that government is a necessary evil, but an evil nevertheless. Why then would you want to contaminate “That which is Sacred” by any contact with such an immoral government as the American Government has become? And it has become that way because it moved away from the Libertarian Principles which motivated Thomas Jefferson, and the Radicals of the American Revolution. Those principles lead to both Civil Liberties, and Free-Market Capitalism. The two are intimately entwined.

But the legal reason why any official prayer before a townhall meeting, or any public-government event, should be illegal is that it is both a form of involuntary servitude, and a form of theft.

Prayer before a government event, like a city council meeting, violates the Constitutional prohibition against Involuntary Servitude, by forcing an attendee at a townhall meeting to either wait through the prayer, or remove themselves from the hall. But the reason they came to the meeting was to conduct secular, government business. In that their time and energy has been wasted in the course of their carrying out their civic duties or necessities, they have been forced into involutary servitude. You should not have your time wasted, or be forced to leave a public hall, because of someone else’s religious practices. And this is the one of the real reasons why this ruling by the Supreme Court is wrong, immoral, and unConstitutional.

The other reason is the theft of those taxpayer’s monies who agree with Jefferson on separation of church and state. While the prayers are being said in the townhall, the lights are running, the air conditioner may be going, the electricity is being used — and all, not in the service of legitimate government functions, but to further the religious propaganda of one of our major organized religions. These lights and power all cost money, and the fact that that tax money is being mulcted out of the Jeffersonian Citizens to pay for this violation of Separation of Church and State is actually Theft of Money, which in Libertarian Doctrine is a very serious, heinous crime.

In short, these prayer-pushers at public meetings are Slave Owners and Thieves, breeding factionalism and division among the American Public.

And the five disgraceful “Justices”, who voted for this vile overthrow of the Separation of Church and State, need to be impeached.

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

 

Murray Rothbard Endorses Norman Mailer: When Left Meets Right

April 30, 2014

Silverwolf had taken a vow of silence, until the silence of the voters will have silenced his nascent candidacy in the upcoming primaries.

But the network of interstices that link various thinkers sent us on a refresher quest of the key political, economic and issue positions of two of our favorite philosophers; they were thinkers, and very perceptive.

First, we rewatched Norman Mailer’s 77 min documentary, “Oh My America”. Really good. Chocked full of insights, like most of Mailer’s non-fiction writing. And deep insights, like Sartre, one after another until your exhausted from the mental pleasure. Mailer gives a lot of very valid observations of the times, which no one born after 1977 can ever really grasp, just like those born in the 1940s and 50s can’t existentially grasp what it was really like to live in the 1920s and 30s. In ancient times, men didn’t change very much from one generation to another. Now, it’s a completely different culture every 20 or 30 years.

At the same time, we began to reread Professor Murray Rothbard’s “For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto”. Like the Communist Manifesto, it lays down, in simple detail, the basic Libertarian principles, and the moral basis of many Libertarian viewpoints. It is a book that will really make you think, and even if you don’t agree with Libertarianism, you will know what it means after reading this work.

In the midst of all this, we began to rummage around for that book we knew we had on Norman Mailer’s campaign for the Mayoralty of New York City, but rummage though we might, we couldn’t find it. So we hurried to the internet and searched for Mailer’s 1977 campaign. There were several articles, but none that talked in great detail about the campaign and its strategy.

However, in one written by John Buffalo Mailer, his son, he mentions Murray Rothbard. And suddenly we thought, what would Rothbard have thought about this campaign? Did he have any contact with it?

With baited mind we googled Mailer and Rothbard, and there it was. An article written by Murray Rothbard, not only praising Mailer’s run, calling him the Libertarian alternative, but, for the first time ever in “Libertarian Forum”, formally endorsing anyone for public office. This was truly a marriage of Left and Right, and it was very heartening to hear this supposed Rightwing Fanatic endorsing a staunch Leftist.

Norman Mailer defined himself as a “Left Conservative”. He once said his views on birth control were to the Right of the Catholic Church. He contrasted the two types of Republican or Rightwing Conservatives as the “Principle Conservatives” and the “Flag Conservatives” Robert Taft would have fallen into the first class; just about every major Republican politician in the last 40 years has fallen into the latter class McCain, Palin, Boehner, Gingrich, Bachmann, McConnell, Christie, Perry (ha!ha!),
Schwartznegger, Guliani, the Bushes, the list goes on and on.

Mailer and Rothbard were a thousand miles above these people, although they obviously didn’t agree on many issues. It’s interesting too that while many are assaulting “Seccession” as a Rightwing nut issue (and personally, we think a Federal America would be stronger than 50 independent states, or having some secceed. Who’d want to exchange their currency and pay a bank 5% for the privilege every time you crossed a state line? And what about Federal Enforcement of Civil Rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights?), Norman Mailer was advocating in his campaign, not only that New York City should succeed from New York State and become the 51st State, but also that all the neighborhoods that make up New York should have their own autonomy, elections, run their own schools, etc. A devolution of power to local control.

Mailer quips in his documentary that the sad thing was that, up until a week before the election, he actually thought he was going to win, along with his co-campaigner and candidate, Jimmy Breslin, the newspaper journalist, who was running along with Mailer, for the head of the city council. Mailer ended up with 4% of the vote.

If you want to read Murray Rothbards paean of praise for Mailer’s candidacy, here it is:http://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/murray-n-rothbard/mailer-for-mayor/.

The Left and Right contra Fascismus.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Silverwolf Runs for Office

April 17, 2014

Silverwolf is running for elected office, to bring his outlandish views to the wider public. He will be suspending this blog temporarily until he loses his primary bid in late May.

Onward to defeat!

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

The Nigel Farage-Nick Clegg Debate No. 2 on the EU: Deutschland Uber England

April 4, 2014

The second of the Farage-Clegg debates, this one sponsored by the BBC, was concluded less than a day ago, and the blood has been mopped up.

This second debate replayed many of the elements of the first, but the post debate polling, which had given the first debate to Farage 58%-36%, gave him this one also, but at 69%-28%.

While both these politicians seemed like scumbags in their own particular ways, Silverwolf would have to concur with the polls, not only in Farage’s debating execution, but also in a general sympathy with many of Farage’s views, while at the same time differing with him on several points in which Silverwolf agreed with Clegg.

We think this debate is quite prescient in illustrating what is going to happen in Western politics, and we think this will follow similar patterns in many societies. Thus, these two debates were quite significant precursers of future political trends.

Nick Clegg sounded very much like the Democrats in America, losing ground, and desperately trying to talk themselves out of a hole, while using inaccurate, legalistic language. Like Clinton’s legal deposition, and Obama’s “If you like your insurance, you can keep it”, Clegg’s assertion than only 7% of British legislation originated in Brussels as per a House of Commons report, was an legalistic lie. Farage then quoted from the same report as saying that an estimated 50% of all British legislation originated in Brussels, and then Clegg had to amend his lie by saying that 7% of all “primary” legislation originated there — that shows what an obfuscating liar Clegg is, and the usual worthless scumbag politician. He also went down the line, hitting all the correct issue buttons and catchphrases which the scientific brainwashing propagandists have told him win votes. It was sickening to see him mouth the same phrases, over and over, the same arguments over and over, and it’s no wonder that he lost. He is the Tony Blair clone, and dares to call himself a Liberal, when all he wants is more power for the mega-corporations, and having Englishmen slave for these foreign-owned companies, while anything the workers accumulate in what Clegg had the audacity to call “hard cash” is inflated away at whim by the Western central banks whenever the corporations call them on the carpet. Inflation keeps people slaving away all over the world; it is one of the chief tools of the collectivists for making sure that people never get out of their poverty, or economic rut.

Clegg had the audacity to say that it was all about “jobs, jobs, jobs,”, but the true aim of the free-market capitalist would be a society in which there was vast leisure, and people didn’t have to do these mind-deadening jobs, 40 hours a week. In a truly Capitalist society, with the Individual always placed above the Corporation, most people would be affluent, and would usually only work when they had the inclination. And they would have that inclination, not only for the remunerative rewards, but also because they enjoyed doing the work.

Such a truly Capitalist society would actually be the fulfillment of the oft quoted goal of the Communists: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. This is exactly what would quickly result in a few generations at most in a truly free-market Capitalist society, with a Jeffersonian-Bill of Rights, and a Republic or Parliamentary Democracy with democratic elections to choose the representatives, and a rigorous separation of Church and State. Such a radically free society, the epitome of Classical Liberalism, or Libertarianism as it is now called, would bring about, paradoxically, a society very close to the Communist’s ideal, and would result in a vast increase in human happiness, as well as a vast decrease in mankind’s misery.

Another very weak point for Clegg was Farage’s production of a Clegg flyer from 2008 saying that he was then in favor of a referendum, but now he was against it, and that original promise had never been fulfilled. Clegg tried to make a case why a Democratic Referendum being put to the British voters was a bad idea right now. (And here he pulled the “our economy is so fragile and just recovering and this would be dangerous” argument while earlier he’d been touting all the wonderful economic benefits that EU membership has brought Britain. Man, do these goons readily think the public is that stupid, that they can’t see the lying words, and the absurd arguments, like a bad lawyer trying to defend a weak case?)

When it came to Farage’s weaknesses, it was his arguments against “involvement” in Syria, as if carpet bombing Assad’s government buildings would have involved British boots on the ground, and the little smile Farage gave when Clegg quoted Farage’s quote on Putin playing Syria masterfully, as if it were a game, showed that Farage is an immoralist too. And to say that Libya would be better under a Li’l Hitler like Moammar Ghadaffi, a Mass Murderer, a Mass Torturer, and a War Criminal (napalm in Chad), than it now is shows that Farage, like Clegg, is also an immoral scumbag. Nor was Silverwolf enamoured with Farage’s enthusiasm for fracking and nuclear energy, or his denial of global warming, which seems pretty self-evidently true from the erratic weather patterns and droughts, and increase in ferocity of typhoons and tornadoes. Global warming may not exist, but it would be prudent to act as if it did exist, rather than do irreversible harm by continuing to ignore it. But look at the lying and hypocritical Obama Administration. While Kerry is wailing about innaction on global warming, Democrat Senators Wyden and Merkley, as well as Liberal Democrat Peter DeFazio are all braying for a vast expansion in logging in the Oregon forests, what is left of them. Solar energy is obviously man’s ultimate solution, the problem of disposal of nuclear waste still not being satisfactorily solved, and sunlight being as abundant and free as air.

 Clegg, for his part was wrong on the Ukraine, where he echoes the Orwellian Newspeak of the West, ignoring the fact that this was a democratically-elected government overthrown by violent mobs which have installed two Nazi parties, Pravy Sektor and Svoboda, in power on the border of Russia. Farage took exactly the correct position on this issue, and said he could well understand why Putin has acted like he has, and why he feels threatened, given the recent words of NATO leaders and Ukraine’s Nazi government.

Clegg’s argument that Britain has more clout being in the EU than it has out was one of his weakest arguments, along with his opposition to a democratic referendum on the issue.  An opposition he shares with PM Cameron of the Conservatives, and MP Milliband, head of the Labour Party,  — all of whom oppose giving the British electorate a democratic chance to state their views via a referendum. Perhaps that was Clegg’s feeblest argument of the whole debate. (And it is interesting that Milliband has asked that Farage be banned from the TV debates in the upcoming elections. Those Leftists love censorship, despite their claims of loving free speech and democracy.)

Clegg made a big show of saying, yes, the British should and, he promised, would vote by referendum on any changes in EU laws, but then Farage pointed out that new laws and regulations are made almost weekly, and that the British haven’t voted by referendum on in EU in over 40 years. This made Clegg’s promise seem very hollow indeed.

Clegg also made a royal lie when he claimed that Farage had said that 400-plus million EU workers would flood Britain, while Farage had clearly said that they could, he never said they would. He merely said that, under current EU rules, they would be able to. This is the type of cheap shot that destroys a politician’s credibility.

There were two more sickening and subtle lies these politicians put forth in there delivery: one for each of them.

Clegg has this collectivist way of saying “we” and “us” when he refers to the wealth of the whole country, but when a stock-owner of a foreign corporation takes a dividend out of British industry, how does that benefit the charwoman? These collectivist’s “we”s and “us”es are used by American and British politicians to refer to the entire society, but the only reality you have of America or Britain is the everyday experiences you live through, the specific people you meet and interact with, and your relationship with them, and the place you live in and the surroundings. These are “you”, not some fictious “we” when the politician says “we are stronger for being in the EU” or similar lying generalities. That generality is not a reality, but the purchasing power of the charwoman’s hourly wage is, to her. She could care less about Britain’s balance of trade, or getting rid of roaming charges for the bourgeoisie tourists who go to Europe, when she can barely afford bus fare to and from work. When politicians say “we” and “us” in refering to the economy, run from them.

Farage’s big lie was on the function of government, which he put as some vague increasing of opportunities. Pure pablum, and way off base. You’d think that a British politician would know better, but things must have gone way down in Old Blighty since the days of Cromwell and the Glorious Revolution. Libertarians know that government has one fundamental function: the defence of property rights, which includes your body, and the defence of the Jeffersonian Bill of Rights and your inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, which in earlier documents was termed “property”. (Jefferson had the insight to see that the only real use of property was the pursuit of happiness, and that varied with each individual.) Moreover, the Libertarian has one core axiom to measure any political proposal: the non-aggression axiom which states that no man or group of men may aggress against the property rights of any individual.

Incidentally, it is interesting to speculate that, while England fought a ferocious war for survival against the German Nazis of WW II, they could now be legally invaded by tens of millions of Germans, and not be able to say a word agin it. So much for British Sovereignty. Deutschland Uber England may be the slogan of the future if Clegg gets his druthers.

We’d guess these debates will go a long way to strengthen Farage’s political position, and the positions of politicians who parrot his views. These views are on the rise, and as he correctly pointed out, the failures of Euro-collectivism are leading to more and more extremism from Nazis and other, economically-starved masses. Jeffersonian free-markets lead to true Liberalism; Clegg’s brand of “Liberalism”, which is its opposite in reality, leads to political extremism and Fascism. You can see it in Greece, in Hungary, and in Ukraine. Western governments, like Obama’s and Cameron’s, and their collaborating “opposition” parties, are losing ground with the public, who now get to hear clearly stated real opposition.

While both Clegg and Farage are propagandists and liars, it is clear from the debate results poll in whom the public places more credence.

Hooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Judge Ted Sleeps With Two Japanese War Criminals: Matsui and Tojo

March 23, 2014

Judge Ted was reminiscing with Silverwolf about the time he slept with two Japanese War Criminals.

It was in Osaka, and Judge Ted was recuperating from jungle-rot of the feet in a large hospital ward, in the center of which was a cage that housed the  condemned Japanese War Criminals, Matsui and Tojo.

Judge Ted went up to them and tried to engage them in conversation. Matsui was quite willing. “He was very intelligent”, the Judge relates, “and spoke perfect English. He was also in great physical shape, and he could do more push-ups at 70 than I could do at 19. He seemed like a nice guy.”

But what about the fact that his troops murdered an estimated 300,000 Chinese civilians in the Rape of Nanking? Silverwolf queries.

“Well, he was far behind the troops. He couldn’t do anything about it. And they’d called him out of retirement to serve again, which he didn’t want to do, but didn’t have much choice.”

Yeh, sure. These War Criminals are never responsible for the mass murder of women and children, many burned alive or buried alive, or the mass rapes. Given the estimated 10 million Chinese civilians who were murdered by Japanese troops, it’s laughable to believe that this was some random act of cruelty perpetrated by rogue elements, and that the Generals knew nothing about it, or couldn’t control it, or were morally aghast at it. No, they wanted it and ordered it.

Matsui also told Judge Ted, “You know, if they don’t hurry up and hang me, I’ll soon be dead anyway.” Matsui was 70.

And what about Tojo? asks Silverwolf.

“Oh, he was scared! He wouldn’t look at any of us, just down at the ground. Some of the guys would dangle there dog-tags in front of him, taunting him, and reminding him that he was going to be hung. They also criticised me for talking to Matsui, but, I don’t know, I kinda liked the guy.”

Well, Judge Ted is a forgiving guy, unless you’re a Republican.

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Libertarians Crush The Democrats in Florida Special Election

March 17, 2014

Few political pundits recall that it was Dionysius of Halicarnassus who said that “history is philosophy teaching by example”. Certainly few Democratic pundits remembered that adage, so they were surprised by their very significant defeat in the Florida Special Election for the House last week. Had they realized the hatred of American Individualists for a constant barrage and assault on their personal energies in order to fulfill unConstitutional demands inflicted on them by the State, they might have anticipated the results. But they were obviously fooling themselves.

The Democrats lost, not because of the Republicans, but because of the Libertarian vote for Lucas Overby, which came in at 4.8%. This was two and two-thirds as much as the difference between the Democrats and Republicans, and unusually high for a Libertarian candidate, who normally garner 1-2% of the vote, though there have been a few cases where they topped 5%. This shows that the work of Libertarian writers and thinkers, along with the campaign ideas of Ron Paul, and combined with the obvious incompetence of the Democrats in everything they touch, has brought a lot of people to see the necessity of voting Libertarian. Additionally, we’d guess that a lot of younger voters, who voted for Obama, now realized they voted for a propagandized Image who has burdened them with trillions of new dollars of debt, imposed a healthcare mandate on them that will take most of their spare cash for years to come if they have any kind of decent income, and made it even harder for poor youths to get any kind of work through jacking up the minimum wage law. We’d bet a lot of these former Obama voters just didn’t turn up, or moved over to the true Classical Liberalism of the Libertarians. Obama’s enforcement of the pot laws, in the face of so many states legalizing it, or semi-legalizing it, shows the Youth better than anything else what an old reactionary fogey is the President.

And even the Republicans were scared. The Libertarian Frankenstein which Ron Paul sowed together and revivified has stormed out of the castle and is terrorizing the political landscape all over America, and the Republican’s even had to have Senator Rand Paul call in his support for candidate Jolly, the very son of the man who energized that Frankenstein. Both the Republicans and the Democratic peasants were out with their flaming flambeaus, looking for the giant who might topple them. The fact that the Libertarian got 266% of the difference between the Republican winner and the Democratic loser must scare the hell out of both parties, and you can bet they’ll start to incorporate some of Libertarian rhetoric in their speeches, since they are both parties of conforming lemmings, with political dogmas and image-making based on false, un-Jeffersonian, ideologies.

It was also clear they were scared from the fact that the media made little or no mention of the unusually high Libertarian vote, not wanting to call attention to the fact, which attention might serve to make it “cool” to vote Libertarian.

Libertarian Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson got roughly 1% of the vote in 2012. A Libertarian gets almost 5% in a bellweather House election in 2014. It shows you what 17 months of big State Socialism does to people’s psyches.

This is just the beginning.

Hoooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwww! — Silverwolf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 64 other followers