Archive for January, 2008

Lord Bertrand Russell and the Racist

January 24, 2008

One of Silverwolf’s favorite Bertrand Russell incidents deals with the time the Lord was on a walking tour of Britain. At one point, a car pulled over and the driver, a pleasant enough seeming chap, offered Russell a lift, which he accepted.

As they drove along, the topic somehow came to that of racial prejudice, and they both heartily agreed that racial prejudice was a very wicked thing indeed. The conversation drifted to other topics, and somehow came onto the Serbs, and at the mention of their name, the driver reared up and snorted “All Serbs are vile!”

Now Russell points this out as a typical example of people holding hypocritical and contradictory opinions. How many people have we known who eschew race prejudice, or really are not very prejudiced, but have an antipathy towards one particular group as if every single person in that group were bad to the core, but towards all other groups they profess a broadminded toleration. It would be funny if it didn’t get so many people killed.

Silverwolf has always felt that one of the proofs that racism is false and that there really aren’t different races is that there is more psychological similarity between people of different races and the same sex, then there is between men and women of the same race. And this is also assuming you accept a general constellation of psychological factors that tend to occur fairly regularly in men and women, and which defines a lot of their differences. Well, a Black Man in rural tribal Africa will have more in common psychologically with the White Man in Scandinavia than he will have with his wife or the girls of his tribe. And the same will be true with his wife, she will have more in common with the psychological constellation of the blond Monmartre housekeeper or concierge than she will have with her husband or the chief of the tribe. To Silverwolf this is one sure refutation of racism and racist theory, for if races truly existed there would be more similarity psychologically between the male and female of the same race, that the same sex members of two different races. That is Silverwolf’s original opinion.

On top of which — lets face it, White Folks are just inferior, as science has shown. The kneecap of the Black African is of superior design to the White European, which is probably why Whites died out in Central Africa — they were the slowest runners, and couldn’t outrun the sabretooth tigers, so they got eaten first. Whites are also so dim-witted that they permitted Reagan and Thatcher to phase out CFCs over about 8 years, so that millions of extra White Folk ended up with skin cancer, when it could have been done in a year, though at great cost to industry and its stock owners. That shows the inferior intelligence of the White Man to the Black Man, who was smart enough to impart pigment to his skin long ago, before there was a rush for sunscreen by Whitey.

So let’s not quibble about who is apparently more or less intelligent. Science and empiricism would so far seem to indicate the darker complected humans to be of superior intelligence. But of course, this is also all nonsense.

Silverwolf believes that everyone comes out as an individual, and he has observed the very bright and the very dull in every ethnic race, culture and both sexes. These mass stereotypes are for the puerile.

However, Silverwolf has sometimes wondered if there might be culturally conditioned tendencies that would cause people of certain cultures to use their brains in certain highly-developed and skilled ways that might have an actual effect on the human cerebral cortex if continued for, say, 30 generations, over the course of a thousand years.

Say, for example, one culture prized above all else physical prowess, form and athletic performance — like the ancient Greeks. What would a human brain be like if most “successful” Greeks spent 8 hours in the gym working out every day, followed by various health procedures, massages, teas, etc, imparted a very strong puritan moral imperative in their young that physical prowess and development were the only real, worthy social virtues — like money to the capitalist, or sharing to the socialist — and were urged to mate with (and it was a grand honor for the girls) the finest and most gymnastically talented young maidens the society could harvest for the enjoyment of its most successful –what would such a brain be like after 1000 years of constantly moving with a uni-directional, passionate drive towards Swedish-calisthenics perfection?

Something similar to this occurred with the Hindu Yogis, who literally spent years sitting around becoming aware of the inner mechanisms of their body’s functions, and maintaining the instrument of their organism while being fully conscious from moment to moment of everything that was going on around them. What would such a brain be like after 1000 years of such  physical care, awareness, and constant alertness?

And what of a musical culture? Say the highest form, the greatest good, was the song, the tune, the eternal narcotic that so easily focuses the mind effortlessly on the immediate moment if one really loves a song. No one has to force you to enjoy, or listen closely, to a song you really love. It just happens naturally.

Now say a tribe in Central Africa developed an incredibly complex drumming culture, and the chief and most honored citizens were the top drummers. These drummers would have their choice of the most musically talented and attractive drummer girls, and so, over the course of a thousand years, the brains might develop in a different way than in the previous examples cited heretofore.

Finally, let’s take a mercatilist society with a very strong sense of family and property — say China before the Marxists, or the Japanese rice traders, the great grandfathers of technical analysis. Let’s imagine a mercantilist brain, constantly engaged in the pursuit of profit, weighing possibilities, and in essence accepting the implicit judgement that more is better. Of course, this more was for the entire family and clan, so one could be self-seeking and still feel one was being selfless and responsible for ones closest relatives, which one was. Under the extremely precarious circumstances that people lived in , in the old days of China, you could not blame people for seeking a semblance of security in a mercatilist system. Indeed, it is the only one that insures  some order, because it follows the natural inclinations of man, the desire for profit and value fulfillment (Rothbard’s insight).

So what all this is drawing towards is this: might there be tendencies in certain ethnic groups that have passionately pursued certain value systems over the course of centuries that may have developed their brains in certain ways that differ from other groups: the musicians, the mercantilists, the physical culturists, the literary cult, the drama and thespian cults, the hyper-legalists: all these specialized ways to using the brain seem, it seems to Silverwolf, to admit perhaps of the possibility that after a thousand years, certain cultures may have developed their brains in certain ways that are far beyond other cultures.

Of course, that will be cured by the intermarriage of our age, when the brain accepts the higher intelligences of the two mixed races, rather than degenerating as the racial purists wrongly posit. The alley dog has the strongest resistance and the greatest native intelligence; the thoroughbred (inbred), is skittish, dainty, and dim-witted.

Moreover, the horrible homogenization of the world, where everyone is wearing these horrible American clothes, makes the cultural isolation Silverwolf idealizes a thing of pre-1960. He is dreaming again.

The refutation of any racist implication in any possible validity of his theory of brain specialization is this: Silverwolf maintains that any human brain would be capable of these specialized developments if it were raised in those cultures. The fact that Anyman’s Brain could develop these specialized skill is the other proof that racism and racist theory is a lie.

Silverwolf will howl to the truth of that.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

John Rothmann: Hypocrite on Racism

January 21, 2008

Silverwolf was fairly sickened the other evening to hear Democrat talk-show host, John Rothmann, refer to Ron Paul as an “anti-Semite” in spite of Dr. Paul’s renunciations as to his having written any of the controversial material that occurred in the newsletters carrying his name. As Silverwolf has discussed previously, he reviewed the passages on David Duke and Zundel in the newsletters and could not call them “anti-Semitic”. In light of Dr. Paul’s long association with Murray Rothbard, Aaron Russo, Walter Block, Bert Blumert, and his admiration for Ludwig Mises, Frederick Hayek, Ayn Rand, Nathaniel Branden, Dr. Martin Luther King, and Rosa Parks, and in light of the fact that Austin, TX NAACP leader, Nelson Lender, who has known Dr. Paul for 20 years, stated that in his opinion Dr. Paul is not a racist, it is interesting to ponder Rothmann’s character assassination. To call someone a racist when they are not is a serious crime, the crime of character assassination. People ought to be absolutely sure when they throw around such charges.

Now our previous blog dealt with the hypocrisy of those who call Dr. Paul a racist, but then warmly support Barack Obama. Silverwolf pointed out that Obama belongs to a church which gave its Man of the Year Award to the racist Jew-baiter, Louis Farrakhan, a fitting successor to the war-criminal Jules Streicher. He has also embraced the Jew-hater Al Sharpton. Now, this does not necessarily mean that Obama is an anti-Semite; but it does mean that he is willing to entertain warm relations with those who try to incite violence and hatred against Jews.

A few minutes after Rothmann charged that Dr. Paul was an anti-Semite, a woman caller phoned in and pointed out the very points that Silverwolf has pointedly made regarding Obama’s long association with these racist miscreants — and what was Rothmann’s response? A hurried defense of Obama, stating over and over that he has supported Israel as a Senator, etc. and completely sloughing off and ignoring the fact that he belongs to a church (and a church that pointedly defines itself as a Black church — one wonders what the reaction would be if Dr. Paul belonged to a church that defined itself as a “White” church) that has given its highest award to a rabid racist. When the woman reiterated the fact that this congregation had given it’s highest award to a racist, Rothmann countered that his Rabbi had recently been charged with some form of sexual misconduct, but that did not necessarily reflect the views of the congregation on sexual harassment. But this, of course, is a completely specious parallel, and won’t wash,  and someone as erudite in the art and subtleties of forensics as John Rothmann knows it. The whole congregation endorsing racism by giving its highest award to a racist is not the same thing morally as the sexual pecadilloes of the Rabbi, which reflects only on his own character, and will be rectified once he is replaced.

As  Mr. J Krishnamurti said, when you’re making propaganda, it’s a lie.

 That woman caller called Rothmann on his inconsistency, but he finally calmed her down enough to where she “hoped” Obama was not a racist. Modern American compromise.

Now, Silverwolf is not calling Obama a racist. But he is saying that he is willing to hang out with and embrace rabid Jew-haters like Sharpton, something that John Rothmann doesn’t seem to mind one iota, while Dr. Paul, who almost certainly didn’t write the scat that contaminates his newsletters, not only speaks, but also acts, against the racist drug-legislation that has enabled Bill Clinton, Hilary Clinton, and Barack Obama to jail and ruin the lives of so many Black Folks, folks who will be pardoned and released on day one if Dr. Paul is elected president.

And Rothmann’s final out, in any conversation where perceptive callers point out the putrid politics of the Democratic frontrunners, is to ask them about the Supreme Court and a woman’s right to choose, and what will happen if “any” Republican wins. I wonder that Rothmann never seems to care about the rights of the terminally ill to choose to end their pain by using heroin, something the Democratic drug-warriors have denied to the terminally ill for years, so that probably millions of Americans have died in excruciating agony because a Fascist caitiff like Bill Clinton didn’t have the guts once in his eight years in office to fight for the rights of the dying. And let’s not forget that $400-a- haircut Edwards, the “man of the people” with his 31 million dollars, is so morally bankrupt that he even opposes the medical use of cannabis, according to NORML. What moral trashbins these “people” are.

And those who have listened to Dr. Paul know that if that “Republican” is elected, not only will the racist drug-laws be chucked out in a day, and the millions of Black, White and Hispanic prisoners be freed, but the terminally ill, now rotting in pain and agony in the hospices of America will have new hope that their pain will be assuaged. Thank you, Ron Paul, for caring about society’s true underdogs.

And as for John Rothmann, the Hypocrite of Racism, he is truly “a shanda fur der Goyim” — a disgrace in front of the Gentiles.

Silverwolf will howl to that.

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. — Silverwolf