Archive for August, 2012

Aspects of the Meaning of Meaning

August 20, 2012

Two men meet on a desert trail. One is a Trobriand Islander; the other a Roumanian. They wish to barter water for cash with each other, but neither can make himself intelligible to his interlocutor. In this case, the meaning of words and sounds cannot be established without several months or years of intense study. Thus, there is no transaction, and a certain thirsty death for one of the pair, while the other misses a commercial profit he needed to pay off his hernia surgery. Does the lack of meaning of their words mean that an unnecessary tragedy has occurred, and does that tragedy in itself give the situation meaning?

(Here, it should be added, for documentary reasons, that, in the aforementioned case, the Trobriand Islander had been kidnapped as a baby by a troupe of roving Roumanian musicians, which had been touring the South Seas, and he’d been raised in the suburbs of Bucharest, so that he spoke only pure Roumanian, while the Roumanian had emigrated to the Trobriand Islands at the age of 21, and there been almost struck by a bolt of lighting which, landing but a few feet from him, had caused such an electrical shock to his system, that his entire previous life, including his years in Roumania and his encyclopedic knowledge of the Roumanian language and its syntax, were completely wiped out from his memory, so that he was left with only the ability to speak the lip of the Trobriand Islanders. Please never assume!)

Then there is the case of two men who speak the same language and are discussing some vitally important philosophical or personal problem. They exchange many words, which they both understand, and finally arrive at some insight which clarifies the philosophical issue or solves the personal problem in a great psychological catharsis for one or both of the interlocutors. Words have made things pellucidly clear, and the two men feel happy, whereas when they began the dialogue, one or both were in a state of mental turmoil. In this case, meaning between two brains has been established, with positive outcome, unlike the first case.

But standing back from these two men, what does the situation of two men communicating or communing in a philosophical dialogue mean when looked at as an objective act on the earth? Standing back from that dialogue, perhaps observing the whole scene with the eye of Nature which does not understand these men’s language, one can ask, “What is the meaning of that event?” Obviously, from the standpoint of Nature, that event of two men babbling to each other and understanding their words to their philosophical and psychological benefit has just as little meaning as the first case where the two men did not understand each other and suffered tragedy.

And on a larger scale, what would be the meaning of creating an Earth that functioned beautifully, with no violence at all and a pristine environment, all achieved after centuries and millenia of travail and sorrow? Would it have any extraneous meaning to anything if, only a day after achieving this state of global nirvana, the Earth were swallowed in a black hole, and all existence as we know it on this planet were to be sucked away in an instant? What would be the meaning of all that Human effort at reform, destroyed instantaneously by a laughingly meaningless Cosmos?

Y’all understand my meaning?

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Advertisements

The Olympics Travesty: The World’s Great Escape

August 10, 2012

Once again the Socialists and Nationalists of the world are providing bourgeois entertainment for their masses, as those who preach the brotherhood of man breed competition both nationalist and individual. Only 2,197 miles away, women and children are having their throats cut, being buried under concrete rubble, and being gunned down by snipers as they search for food and water. But the world seems to be far more interested in the “agony” of the athletes, in their puerile competitions, rather than the agony of the children being slaughtered. Such is the morality of the Social Democrats of Euroland, and the Socialist regimes around the world, which is virtually all of them. All they seek is entertainment and the corn dole: bread and circus.

And, to exacerbate the crime, the Individual Capitalist taxpayer is looted of the fruits of his labor to subsidize this mass entertainment, and the government-run radio stations in England, America, Australia, and Canada, can get away with wasting their taxpayer’s money on providing this pablum of non-essential news just because the vaste majority of the populace lap it up like cats licking radiator coolant. This crime against Capitalists and Capitalism, this vast dissipation of life energy that could be put to survivalist use, or merely conserved for future utility, — all this energy is dissipated and wasted in the name of providing mass entertainment.

The same hypocritical politicians who preach brotherly love, equality, and internationalism, are right up front there talking out of the other side of their mouths about the spirit of the Olympics, the greatness of cutthroat-competitive sports, and why didn’t our great country win more of these stupid tokens. Anything to divert the masses from the misery which Government brings on the Individual, especially the young.

Just as in ancient Rome, the modern Citizens of Rome — the Bourgeoisie in North America, Europe and Australia — are once again enjoying their Bread and Circus, while all around in their surrounding Empires, slaves work in mines, tow the galleys of the taxman’s exploitation, and starve in the face of the continuing central bank’s inflation.

Escape, Mankind, into your dream life of useless sports entertainment for a few hours, for when it’s over, you’ll be faced with the same brutal, ugly, vivisectionist world.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf