Archive for the ‘environmentalism’ Category

The Nigel Farage-Nick Clegg Debate No. 2 on the EU: Deutschland Uber England

April 4, 2014

The second of the Farage-Clegg debates, this one sponsored by the BBC, was concluded less than a day ago, and the blood has been mopped up.

This second debate replayed many of the elements of the first, but the post debate polling, which had given the first debate to Farage 58%-36%, gave him this one also, but at 69%-28%.

While both these politicians seemed like scumbags in their own particular ways, Silverwolf would have to concur with the polls, not only in Farage’s debating execution, but also in a general sympathy with many of Farage’s views, while at the same time differing with him on several points in which Silverwolf agreed with Clegg.

We think this debate is quite prescient in illustrating what is going to happen in Western politics, and we think this will follow similar patterns in many societies. Thus, these two debates were quite significant precursers of future political trends.

Nick Clegg sounded very much like the Democrats in America, losing ground, and desperately trying to talk themselves out of a hole, while using inaccurate, legalistic language. Like Clinton’s legal deposition, and Obama’s “If you like your insurance, you can keep it”, Clegg’s assertion than only 7% of British legislation originated in Brussels as per a House of Commons report, was an legalistic lie. Farage then quoted from the same report as saying that an estimated 50% of all British legislation originated in Brussels, and then Clegg had to amend his lie by saying that 7% of all “primary” legislation originated there — that shows what an obfuscating liar Clegg is, and the usual worthless scumbag politician. He also went down the line, hitting all the correct issue buttons and catchphrases which the scientific brainwashing propagandists have told him win votes. It was sickening to see him mouth the same phrases, over and over, the same arguments over and over, and it’s no wonder that he lost. He is the Tony Blair clone, and dares to call himself a Liberal, when all he wants is more power for the mega-corporations, and having Englishmen slave for these foreign-owned companies, while anything the workers accumulate in what Clegg had the audacity to call “hard cash” is inflated away at whim by the Western central banks whenever the corporations call them on the carpet. Inflation keeps people slaving away all over the world; it is one of the chief tools of the collectivists for making sure that people never get out of their poverty, or economic rut.

Clegg had the audacity to say that it was all about “jobs, jobs, jobs,”, but the true aim of the free-market capitalist would be a society in which there was vast leisure, and people didn’t have to do these mind-deadening jobs, 40 hours a week. In a truly Capitalist society, with the Individual always placed above the Corporation, most people would be affluent, and would usually only work when they had the inclination. And they would have that inclination, not only for the remunerative rewards, but also because they enjoyed doing the work.

Such a truly Capitalist society would actually be the fulfillment of the oft quoted goal of the Communists: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. This is exactly what would quickly result in a few generations at most in a truly free-market Capitalist society, with a Jeffersonian-Bill of Rights, and a Republic or Parliamentary Democracy with democratic elections to choose the representatives, and a rigorous separation of Church and State. Such a radically free society, the epitome of Classical Liberalism, or Libertarianism as it is now called, would bring about, paradoxically, a society very close to the Communist’s ideal, and would result in a vast increase in human happiness, as well as a vast decrease in mankind’s misery.

Another very weak point for Clegg was Farage’s production of a Clegg flyer from 2008 saying that he was then in favor of a referendum, but now he was against it, and that original promise had never been fulfilled. Clegg tried to make a case why a Democratic Referendum being put to the British voters was a bad idea right now. (And here he pulled the “our economy is so fragile and just recovering and this would be dangerous” argument while earlier he’d been touting all the wonderful economic benefits that EU membership has brought Britain. Man, do these goons readily think the public is that stupid, that they can’t see the lying words, and the absurd arguments, like a bad lawyer trying to defend a weak case?)

When it came to Farage’s weaknesses, it was his arguments against “involvement” in Syria, as if carpet bombing Assad’s government buildings would have involved British boots on the ground, and the little smile Farage gave when Clegg quoted Farage’s quote on Putin playing Syria masterfully, as if it were a game, showed that Farage is an immoralist too. And to say that Libya would be better under a Li’l Hitler like Moammar Ghadaffi, a Mass Murderer, a Mass Torturer, and a War Criminal (napalm in Chad), than it now is shows that Farage, like Clegg, is also an immoral scumbag. Nor was Silverwolf enamoured with Farage’s enthusiasm for fracking and nuclear energy, or his denial of global warming, which seems pretty self-evidently true from the erratic weather patterns and droughts, and increase in ferocity of typhoons and tornadoes. Global warming may not exist, but it would be prudent to act as if it did exist, rather than do irreversible harm by continuing to ignore it. But look at the lying and hypocritical Obama Administration. While Kerry is wailing about innaction on global warming, Democrat Senators Wyden and Merkley, as well as Liberal Democrat Peter DeFazio are all braying for a vast expansion in logging in the Oregon forests, what is left of them. Solar energy is obviously man’s ultimate solution, the problem of disposal of nuclear waste still not being satisfactorily solved, and sunlight being as abundant and free as air.

 Clegg, for his part was wrong on the Ukraine, where he echoes the Orwellian Newspeak of the West, ignoring the fact that this was a democratically-elected government overthrown by violent mobs which have installed two Nazi parties, Pravy Sektor and Svoboda, in power on the border of Russia. Farage took exactly the correct position on this issue, and said he could well understand why Putin has acted like he has, and why he feels threatened, given the recent words of NATO leaders and Ukraine’s Nazi government.

Clegg’s argument that Britain has more clout being in the EU than it has out was one of his weakest arguments, along with his opposition to a democratic referendum on the issue.  An opposition he shares with PM Cameron of the Conservatives, and MP Milliband, head of the Labour Party,  — all of whom oppose giving the British electorate a democratic chance to state their views via a referendum. Perhaps that was Clegg’s feeblest argument of the whole debate. (And it is interesting that Milliband has asked that Farage be banned from the TV debates in the upcoming elections. Those Leftists love censorship, despite their claims of loving free speech and democracy.)

Clegg made a big show of saying, yes, the British should and, he promised, would vote by referendum on any changes in EU laws, but then Farage pointed out that new laws and regulations are made almost weekly, and that the British haven’t voted by referendum on in EU in over 40 years. This made Clegg’s promise seem very hollow indeed.

Clegg also made a royal lie when he claimed that Farage had said that 400-plus million EU workers would flood Britain, while Farage had clearly said that they could, he never said they would. He merely said that, under current EU rules, they would be able to. This is the type of cheap shot that destroys a politician’s credibility.

There were two more sickening and subtle lies these politicians put forth in there delivery: one for each of them.

Clegg has this collectivist way of saying “we” and “us” when he refers to the wealth of the whole country, but when a stock-owner of a foreign corporation takes a dividend out of British industry, how does that benefit the charwoman? These collectivist’s “we”s and “us”es are used by American and British politicians to refer to the entire society, but the only reality you have of America or Britain is the everyday experiences you live through, the specific people you meet and interact with, and your relationship with them, and the place you live in and the surroundings. These are “you”, not some fictious “we” when the politician says “we are stronger for being in the EU” or similar lying generalities. That generality is not a reality, but the purchasing power of the charwoman’s hourly wage is, to her. She could care less about Britain’s balance of trade, or getting rid of roaming charges for the bourgeoisie tourists who go to Europe, when she can barely afford bus fare to and from work. When politicians say “we” and “us” in refering to the economy, run from them.

Farage’s big lie was on the function of government, which he put as some vague increasing of opportunities. Pure pablum, and way off base. You’d think that a British politician would know better, but things must have gone way down in Old Blighty since the days of Cromwell and the Glorious Revolution. Libertarians know that government has one fundamental function: the defence of property rights, which includes your body, and the defence of the Jeffersonian Bill of Rights and your inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, which in earlier documents was termed “property”. (Jefferson had the insight to see that the only real use of property was the pursuit of happiness, and that varied with each individual.) Moreover, the Libertarian has one core axiom to measure any political proposal: the non-aggression axiom which states that no man or group of men may aggress against the property rights of any individual.

Incidentally, it is interesting to speculate that, while England fought a ferocious war for survival against the German Nazis of WW II, they could now be legally invaded by tens of millions of Germans, and not be able to say a word agin it. So much for British Sovereignty. Deutschland Uber England may be the slogan of the future if Clegg gets his druthers.

We’d guess these debates will go a long way to strengthen Farage’s political position, and the positions of politicians who parrot his views. These views are on the rise, and as he correctly pointed out, the failures of Euro-collectivism are leading to more and more extremism from Nazis and other, economically-starved masses. Jeffersonian free-markets lead to true Liberalism; Clegg’s brand of “Liberalism”, which is its opposite in reality, leads to political extremism and Fascism. You can see it in Greece, in Hungary, and in Ukraine. Western governments, like Obama’s and Cameron’s, and their collaborating “opposition” parties, are losing ground with the public, who now get to hear clearly stated real opposition.

While both Clegg and Farage are propagandists and liars, it is clear from the debate results poll in whom the public places more credence.

Hooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

America’s Major Political Party: The B. F. P.

February 23, 2014

America has one main political party into which fall 97% of the people: the B. F. P. or, as it is better known, the Bipartisan Fascist Party. This party compromises virtually all of the Democrats and Republicans in this country, and though there are many so-called Independents, in the final results the radically different parties — the Libertarians and the Socialist Workers Party for example — generally get only a smattering of votes, perhaps 1-3%. The Lemmings flock to the other two Fascist Parties, both big organs of big government-corporate collaboration in the looting of the Individual, be he worker, small businessman, artisan, or small investor. All are fodder for the giant corporate and government interests that suck, for example, $685 Billion under the Democrat Obama out of the hands of private Capitalists and into the coffers of the military-industrial complex, and pay the average Federal Government employee an annual salary of over $100,000. Some defense surely is needed against countries like Canada, that club baby-seals to death in front of their mothers and skin them alive, or Mexico with its sadistic public bull-baitings and murders. Surely such Miscreant Nations do necessitate some kind of military defense against them, but why are American taxpayers forced to pay for the military defense of rich Socialist countries like Germany and Japan, while property taxpayers in America are constantly asked for more money for police because the government is failing in its Jeffersonian responsibilities to defend property rights, which include your own body (i.e. in Libertarian Theory, an assault on your physical person is considered a property rights violation since your body is part of your property)? Imagine if just a fraction of the more than $100 billion we spend every 365 days defending Europe, were given to counties across America to provide real defense against common crimes. That should be the function of the “Defense Department”, not running hundreds of military bases all over the globe, in secure places like Germany and Japan. Let those bloodsucking Fascists pay for their own defense instead of constantly sucking off the American Taxpayer. The Bipartisan Fascists force you to pay for the defense of these dolphin-butchering, whale-slaughtering Racists, and you, the public, go along with it. What a nation of passive wimps America has become.

At the same time, the B.F.P. is bringing environmental havoc all over the globe, and the chaos is finally hitting those areas of Eastern America and Great Britain that for long have ignored the constant deforestation that is occuring in Liberal Democrat States like Oregon and Washington in America, as well as the South, and the other regions of the Earth that are usually raped for their trees. The BBC today had a real-time map of the massive deforestation that has gone on under the Liberal Democrats,since 2000, not only in America, but in Latin America, Australia, Canada, and Sweden. A Dead Planet will be the legacy of Liberal Democrats like Barack Obama, John Kitzhaber, Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, and Peter DeFazio, collaborators in the destruction of the Earth, and the stooges of the big timber corporations. These Collaborators have sold America so deeply into debt-slavery with their massive governmental schemes, militaristic budgets, easily-exploited welfare programs, and corporate subsidies and give-aways, that they now maintain, as was predictable long ago, that we must rape the forests and sell them to China to pay our debts.

Notice how the debts they created, unConsitutionally and Democratically,  suddenly became “our” debts. This is the inevitable result of Democracy or a Democratic Republic without a Jeffersonian Constitution and Bill of Rights. And the War on Drugs, and earlier Prohibition, as well as Individual Fascists like the transvestite J Edgar Hoover, destroyed the Bill of Rights long ago. President Obama’s proposed “Indefinite Detention without Trial” is just characteristic of this fact. Obviously, Democratic elections are a necessity, but majority rule without a Bill of Rights protecting every Individual and his property will quickly lead to Fascism. In America, that establishment of entrenched Fascism has only taken the 84 years since Hoover really kicked in the Governmental-Corporate Alliance, which was  greatly augmented by his twin, FDR. Both were corporate Fascists, though history is written as if they were exact opposites. There is little difference between Hoover Dam and Obamacare at root.

So now the Liberals like Tony Blair, and Julia Gillard, and Barack Obama, have wrecked the Environment so badly that their countries and citizens are having to pay huge prices and go through living hells just to survive. They ignored the Environmental Movement, and that movement itself has been obviously a failure since it has failed to stop the Destruction of the Planet. The Environmentalists have aligned themselves with the Liberal Democrats who are destroying the Earth, and they are afraid to criticize them. Even the Environmentalists are going along with the destruction of the Earth, not only by not criticizing and vigorously defending those Liberal Democrats, but by taking no vigorous actions that would bring them down, like mass demonstrations at State capitals, boycotts such as the Founding Fathers used against England, and impeachment of leading Democrats for failing to protect the Environment. They’d rather pussyfoot around while the Earth, the Trees, and the Animals —- and finally Mankind, — are destroyed. They don’t have the guts to attack the Democrat Forest Rapists and the Motherearth Frackers.

So that is how it is in America: One Big Fascist Party, and a few believers in Jeffersonian Libertarianism or Marx’s Workers Paradise.

The Bipartisan Fascist Party is destroying the Earth, and you are letting them.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Congressman Peter DeFazio Helps Kill Thousands in the Phillipines

November 16, 2013

Liberal Democrat Congressman Peter DeFazio’s support for logging, and his current O&C Bill, which would drastically increase logging in the National Forest, show the rotten hypocrisy of the Democratic Party, and their brutal and callous disregard for the implications of their actions around the globe.

We know that trees are carbon banks, which take up free CO2 in the atmosphere, and lodge it within their bosoms until they die and decay, when it is gradually re-released. We have also seen major Democratic figures like former V.P. Al Gore speak out forcefully for some kind of control of global warming, which is increasing the ferocity of typhoons, and making world weather much more volatile and destructive. Yet, when it comes to the money over the environment, so-called “Liberal” Peter DeFazio is willing to continue to destroy the Oregon Forests, selling the wood to Red China, in order to partially offset our horrendous trade deficits, and to continue to expose Oregon residents to toxic pesticides like atrazine, which is banned in the European Union.

But when we see the devastation that has taken place in the Phillipines, as tens of thousands of women and children are killed in a typhoon, we can see the real impact of this immoral politician in Washington and his fellow pro-logging Democrats like Senators Wyden and Merkley, and Governor Kitzhaber,, as they all continues to push for environmental destruction, and disregard the incredible misery they and their fellow Tree Butchers are bringing about in the world, as they pursue their desire for money.

Peter Defazio, with his $150k annual Congressional salary, and his fat pension which he will enjoy in his retirement home in New Zealand, will not have to suffer the way the people of the Phillipines are suffering because of his actions, and the actions of loggers around the world. He will not have to leave his island home in the South Pacific and “relocate”, as his immoral pro-logging agenda continues to raise sea levels, and destroy the drinking water and living spaces of the South Pacific Islanders. His actions show he doesn’t give a rat’s ass about them.

In Silverwolf’s opinion, Congressman DeFazio didn’t kill tens of thousands of Filipino children in the typhoon — he murdered them. He knows very well what chaos and misery his actions are causing around the world, but he persists with them.

But we’re sure he’s sleeping very comfortably in his bed tonight, as a typhoon of suffering engulfs the women and children of the Phillipines.

These are the men you elect to office.

Hoooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

They’re Libertarians and They Don’t Know It: The Freedom from Pesticides Bill of Rights

October 1, 2013

In a remote rural county of Oregon, a radical proposition is being placed before the voters that Silverwolf thinks is very significant for radical Individualist Libertarianism, not only because it attacks the Corporate Poisoners, who, in collusion with the Democrats, are slowly poisoning not only the beautiful lands in Oregon, but the local residents as well, but also because the Initiative would place the Rights of Individuals above the fictitious “Rights” of Corporations. These Corporate mass poisonings of the Public, through aerial spraying of dangerous pesticides adjacent to residential properties and lands, in order to swell the corporate coffers of the pesticide Industry, are the fruits of what anti-Fascist Historian  Dave Emory has called the Borman Underground Reich Capital Network, which is basically the wealth looted by the Nazis during WWII translated into corporate power throughout the world. The poisoning of Oregonians with Bayer pesticides is not very different, morally speaking, from the mass poisoning of Jews by Bayer during World War II, except in scale, only now the Democrats are defending the Nazis, instead of attacking them (though, of course, Roosevelt wouldn’t bomb the rail lines leading to the concentration camps, or even the camps themselves). The disgusting Democratic Governor of Oregon, John Kitzhaber, fully backs these attacks on the health of Oregon’s citizens and children, and the attacks on the value of their properties when pesticide residues drift onto their land. And this Shower calls himself not only a Governor but also an M.D.

The group opposing the Fascists and their Democrat Collaborators is the Freedom From Pesticides Alliance at freedomfrompesticidesalliance.org, which is based in Josephine County, Oregon. The actual initiative they are placing on the ballot can be read at their website.

Residential Property Owners must betake themselves to the defense of the environmental integrity of their demesnes, or this will become a rotten realm, fit for no man to live in henceforth. The Democrats and Republicans are destroying the Earth, as are the leaders of virtually every other country, from Valerie Puta, the Russian Whore, in her Siberia, to the Indonesian Tree Butchers of Borneo, to the Nazis with Suntans down under, murdering their kangaroos and deforesting the continent while they push boatloads of women and children back to sea, to the Japanese, Singaporean, and Malaysian investors, who make their money by destroying the rainforests of Asia.

And added to the massive spraying of toxic pesticides adjacent to the properties of Individual Free-Market Capitalists, is a proposed increase in logging and spraying by the Democrat, Congressman Peter DeFazio, which comes in the face of what the other day the UN called a 95% certain chance that global warming is taking place due to Human activity. Trees are Carbon Banks. The Democrats, including Obama and DeFazio, tell us that we have global warming and urgently need a carbon tax, but at the same time DeFazio introduces a Bill that increases logging on so-called “public lands” though they are administered by the BLM as a lucrative boondoggle for themselves and their Fascist, timber-corporation bedfellows. BLM collaboration pays the lucrative salaries, benefit packages, and pensions of the BLM bureaucrats.

So even though living trees are known to be wonderful carbon banks, DeFazio tells us we must cut more trees, as at the same time he tells us we should pay a carbon tax for the sake of the Planet and the coming generations. At the same time, he permits the use of atrazine in America, around children, when it has been banned in the EU since 2003, a ban he critically called for in the 1980s, but now is mum on. What a hypocritical Shower is Liberal Democrat Congressman Peter DeFazio!

(For an exhaustive examination of the pesticides which the Democratic Corporate Fascists are permitting to be sprayed on Americans, you can refer to preciousdirt.org, which is an excellent site for such information.)

It is only Libertarians, who want to defend their Inalienable Natural Right to the Quiet Enjoyment of their Property, and Environmentalists, who rarely seem to understand Free-Market economics, and who seem to have an animus against Capitalism, despite all the benefits it has brought to man’s basic standard of living, but who also share the Libertarians desire to have their properties free from invasion by toxic poisons — it is only these two groups who seem motivated enough to challenge the gradual Corporate Nazification of America, conducted by the mainstream Democrats and Republicans.

Silverwolf has written in the past of how these two philosophies, Libertarianism and Environmentalism, must come together and merge if we are ever to have a free world of free people in an unpolluted environ. A radical, Individual Jeffersonian Libertarianism, as seen in the original Bill of Rights and Constitution, is ultimately based on the defense of Individual Property Rights (and Professor Rothbard has clearly explained how all Rights, including Civil Rights, are ultimately forms of Property Rights, including the Right to own your own body),  Environmentalism, a loving of the Earth and Nature, and a wanting to preserve them as pristinely as possible, is also a type of Property Rights Defense Movement, although here the aim is the survival and health of the Human Race and all Life on Earth. 

Through the legal weapon of the Freedom from Pesticide Bill of Rights, the voters of Josephine County will have a chance to prohibit the use of pesticides by corporate or government entities on all lands within the county except private residential lands. Though they have been accused of being on the side of corporations by the Left, Libertarians like  Professor Murray Rothbard have  repeatedly said that no one has the right to pollute the air you breathe or the water you drink. And, of course, one of the main Libertarian concepts, along the with Non-aggression Axiom, is the idea of freedom from invasion, whether of ones body by pesticide poisoning, rape, assault, or the Draft, or of ones property, like ones land.

As to the Crimes of Child Poisoning and Well Poisoning, — the Governmental Authority at the Federal and State levels has the responsibility and the authority to stop aggressions against Individuals like child poisonings, but that authority this day has become an abuse against Individual Property Rights to the very pitch of wickedness. The Crimes of Well Poisoning and Child Poisoning are so heinous that they may well warrant Capital Punishment, though that might sound extreme. and we have always strongly opposed the Death Penalty on Principle. But we’d settle for Life on Gruel at dull labor, which is what many Law-abiding Americans end up with, or even having the bottom fall out of their corporate stock portfolios, which in America is an even more feared form of Capital Punishment. (“Go ahead and execute me, but Please don’t ruin my stock portfolio!” cried the Corporate CEO at his trial.) Certainly such Crimes deserve at least 20 years in jail.

Governor Kitzhaber and Congressman DeFazio are Corporate Fascists who need to be impeached. These Showers are typical of the bulk of Democratic Politicians, just as deadly to children as the Corporate Republicans. It is a long way to the day when Silverwolf’s dream of having all buildings subterranean is realized, with the surface of the earth looking like one huge contiguous park or forest (and any necessary buildings above ground designed in the Gothic style of Oxford and Cambridge), but the first step to even having an Earth populated by Humans, Animals and Trees may be contained within this Bill.

It seems to us that in using the “Rights” argument to fight the Corporate Nazis, the Environmentalists, at least in this case, are finally on the “Rights” track, though we think the idea of “Community Rights” is an incorrect one which the Corporations can easily slap down. This is because a “Community” is a Collectivist Entity, just like a Corporation. Both are Notional Concepts, mere intellectual phantoms, and not a real Individual Human Being like you, with Inalienable Rights protected by Jefferson’s beautiful Bill of Rights. If a “Community”, which is a Collective, can have Rights, it will be argued, then why not a Corporation, which is also a Collective in our view, although without the coercion of being forced to stay in that Collective (i.e. a worker can walk off the job and quit; an investor can sell his stock).

Moreover, the “community rights” issue is actually a false attempt to enlarge the Jeffersonian concept of Natural Rights. Natural Rights were only inherent in Individual Human Beings, we’d guess in Jefferson’s mind, because at the time environmental pollution and deforestation in America probably never entered into men’s consciousness.  Back then, someone might decry the cutting of a particular grove or area that they loved, but the environmental degradation the upcoming generations are currently facing has gone way beyond that.

However, in establishing a “community rights” concept in Law, the Environmentalists are establishing, or rather re-inforcing, a dangerous anti-Jeffersonian concept — the concept of collective Rights. This phoney and false concept is the very reason Corporations have been able to establish and maintain such a massive violation of the Bill of Rights against Individual Citizens, as well as enabling whole groups to shift their tax burthen to other, less powerful groups and Individuals, both vile forms of cozenage. For example, married people and people with children getting huge tax deductions in the form of exemption credits which single people don’t qualify for (although if we continue to have the immoral income tax, then people with children under 17 should continue to get a tax deduction for up to two children). This massive injustice has gone on for decades, and is soon to be expanded with the legalization of Gay marriage. Such inequalities are corrupt and immoral, but you’ll never hear the Democratic politicians using their bully pulpit to denounce them, and call for their immediate abolition. On the contrary, they applaud it.

So, the establishment of “community rights” is a dangerous, collectivist phantom, that does not exist. However, since most of America passively accepts these collectivist injustices, such as corporate tax breaks and privileges, and marriage tax breaks, then going for “community rights” fits in nicely with the deception. If it helps halt attacks on Individual Free-Marketeer’s bodies and lands, then it is worth trying.

Another problem with the concept of “community rights” is: who defines the “community”? Is it a specific geographic area, and who gets the power to decide where the boundaries are? Now, in this case of Josephine County, the boundaries of the “community” are the borders of the county, so the concept is limited, at least to that extent  in this case. But  what about the members of the community who want the spraying and clearcut logging to continue? What about the people who hate trees, want to kill off Nature, and are so misanthropic that they want to see an end to the Human Being.  Aren’t the Necrophiles entitled to community rights also, since they are part of the community, and it could not be defined as a community without them?

Obviously, the idea of “community” can be extended outwardly indefinitely unto the utmost inhabited regions of the Earth. In actuality, the only “community” on the planet is Human Beings; it includes everybody. But we obviously don’t have control of what happens in “communities” in Siberia or North Korea. And in the short run, we think it imperative for Jeffersonian Classical Liberalism, that America continue to exist as a separate country, since it has the most Libertarian Constitution in the world, and by merging America into a “world community” at the present time, that Constitution would be quickly overthrown by the 80% of the world that is still Totalitarian.

No, the Environmentalists need to stick to one simple point: defending Individual Rights, (and ultimately those are all Individual Property Rights). That’s all Jefferson bit off, and it’s plenty. Don’t complicate it by saying that “ecosystems” or “natural communities” have Rights, because most of the American public, and certainly the legal scholars, won’t buy that. Animals don’t even have rights in America; they can be butchered and eaten by their owners, or butchered and have their corpses sold, to be pleached and plaited with human spittle; they can be slowly tortured to death in useless experiments at universities. What a vile end to a joyous life that began as a chick or a calf or a goat kid or a lamb or a baby salmon!

So if animals don’t have rights in America, and trees don’t have rights, you’re not going to convince a judge or the voting public that “ecosystems or natural communities” have rights, although “natural communities” does include in its concept both the ecosystem and the people living in it, so it might have rights because it involves Individual Humans by definition. But it still fails on the grounds of instilling rights in things other than Humans, which we don’t think will wash with the courts or the public.

However, this is picking tiny flaws in what is otherwise a seemingly well-wrought piece of legislation. One very important point this Bill does address, and it is a point Silverwolf has put forth many times in his posts, is that Individuals must be put above Corporations in the eyes of the Law. Our Jeffersonian Constitution speaks only of Individual Rights; it says nothing about Corporate Rights, and so, in our Laws, Libertarians must fight solely for Individual Rights, for the idea of “Corporate Rights” is an oxymoron and a lie. Collectives don’t have Rights; Individuals do.

So kudos on the Environmental Revolutionaries who crafted this wonderful, though slightly flawed bill. This Libertarian howl of Freedom is for you, and for the necessary coming day when we shall see the marriage of Jeffersonian Classical Liberalism or Libertarianism with the Environmentalists, who are Libertarian Defenders of the Earth and Private Property Rights, but don’t know it yet.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Ron Paul Self-Taints: Hanging Out with the Racists

September 27, 2013

Ron Paul’s recent speaking engagement at a fundraiser for a Holocaust-denying, renegade Catholic priest, who has been thrown out of the Church by the Vatican, combined with his nearly simultaneous interview of the anti-Semite, Julian Assange, on Paul’s web channel, have seriously damaged his credibility in this observer’s eyes, and makes us wonder if our long support of Ron Paul and his principles was mis-directed.

On the Principles for which he has argued, and they are the Jeffersonian Principles of Good Governance, the Natural Rights Liberty of the Individual, and the Free-Market, we have little disagreement.  After reading of the allegations against Ron Paul, many times seemingly blown up and repeated over and over by the liberal-left Democratic media without quoting the actual abuses, and given the economic value to the vested interests that benefit from all the abuses in America that Ron Paul has argued against over and over, — given these two factors, we thought. during his two campaigns, that Ron Paul was being unfairly smeared by the Democratic Left, But these old allegations. in combination with Ron Paul’s recent hobnobbing with two notorious Holocaust-denying Jew-haters, make us believe that they could well be true. Ron Paul may mostly espouse the truth in his speeches, but these recent associations with Racists have tainted him irreparably in our view, and we’re pretty sure they will go on to taint his son when he runs for the Presidency, because if Rand Paul gains political momentum, then his father’s recent associations with Nazi ideologues will be brought up again and again, ruining his chances by association, and then the nation would be cursed with another Democratic Administration for at least four years. One might see 90% of a block of the largest minorities  in America voting in lock-step against Rand Paul, instead of voting for whomever the Democrats push up there as their next dummy, simply because of his father’s hobnobbing with pretty vicious Racists.

Evidently what outed Assange’s racism was an article in Private Eye magazine by the editor, Ian Hilsop, which pointed out the long association between Julian Assange and the Holocaust-denier and notorious anti-Semite, Israel Shamir ( so labelled by both the leftwing British daily, the Guardian, and also the NY Times). According to Hilsop, when Assange read the article, he called Hilsop, and accused him and two other editors of being part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him, although Hilsop isn’t Jewish, and the other two editors had Gentile mothers. Likewise Assange accused the producer of a BBC report critical of Wikileaks and Assange as having a “Zionist” wife, although the editor said that the charge was proposterous, pointed out that neither he nor his wife were even Jewish, and that she had never had any association with Zionism. Given the BBC’s own anti-Semitism in censoring listener responses critical of Arabs, but permitting blatantly anti-Semitic comments from Muslims, as well as the Guardian’s hypercritical attitude towards Israel, it is obvious that Assange has begun to revert to labelling anyone who points out his rotten associations with Racists, as being either part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him or a “Zionist”, the behaviour of a typical denuded Nazi.

Assange’s cyberparty, the Wikileaks Party, which campaigned in the recent Australian elections, and which Assange said in the Ron Paul interview was gaining 25-28% in pre-election polls. apparently crashed and burned when it turned on its proposed alliance with the environmentalist Green Party, and endorsed neo-Fascist parties like the Shooter’s Party, which wants to be able to go into any Australian National Park and murder defenseless animals at will, and the Australia First party, a foreigner-hating bunch of  White foreigners who stole Australia from the Aborigines. Evidently, that awoke the Australian Greens to the real meaning of the Wikileaks Party, and the Party melted down, receiving 0.62% of the vote, after Assange’s above prediction on TV of polling 25-28%. Quite a melt down.

Tragically, these are the type of folks that Ron Paul gives speeches for, and has on his TV show. It might be that Ron Paul is willing to talk to anyone, no matter if they are a racist or not, but personally we wonder how any true Libertarian could hold racist views, since Libertarians regard all men as being equally endowed with certain unalienable Rights, and a racist would have to view some men as being unequally endowed, or not having free-will at all because of their  genetic heritage.  Personally, we think a Racist differs little from a Communist or Socialist who would rob a man of the fruits of his labor, and one should have no contact with either. Both are haters, one of a race, the other of an entire economic class, and one contaminates oneself if one hangs out with either of them, although non-racist Socialists and Libertarians could work together politically on Civil Rights issues, like the Right to Privacy, or opposition to Corporate subsidies, or opposing a peacetime draft or “national service”, or protecting Nature to preserve Capitalism and Life on Earth. Both Racists and Communists would employ terror or violence, and whip up animus against their chosen targets; a Libertarian never, except for an animus against war, injustice, and environmental rape.

Nor should one conclude that all Ron Paul supporters or admirers of Julian Assange are necessarily or even mostly Fascists or Nazis. On the contrary, we’d say that the vast majority of Ron Paul’s rank-and-file supporters are rabidly anti-Fascist, which is why they admire him and what he has said in his campaigns so much. Likewise, many Julian Assange admirers have no idea of his connections with the foaming-at-the-mouth Jew-hater, Israel Shamir (a pseudonym). What they see is someone speaking out against the massive invasions of Privacy conducted by so many world governments, and the subjugation of the Individual around the globe. One might classify them generally as anarcho-utopians, which is pretty far from Hitlerism or Russian Stalinism.

We believe the principles of the Free-Market, of Individual Liberty, and the defense of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are the best prophylactics against the Nazi disease, a disease of Collectivism in combination with Racism. Jeffersonian Libertarianism virtually precludes the establishment of such a Nazi state or system. In fact, if Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi as some have alleged, then it is ironic that his campaigning has done more to establish a broad anti-Nazi, anti-Totalitarian mentality in the American Electorate than perhaps any other modern-day American politician, and possibly, if his motives are really to establish a Nazi State as some allege, he is so stupid as to actually have initiated widespread attitudes against Nazism and Authoritarianism in the American Public.

Ron Paul should consider that the fees he earned at the Fatima “Peace” Conference, and his friendly interview with Julian Assange on his station, may mean in the long run that Senator Ted Cruz becomes President of the United States, instead of Senator Rand Paul. As Martin Bright, a British Labour Party political analyst, explained so well, “If you choose to tolerate or defend a nasty antisemite, it is only a matter of time before people begin to wonder if you are a nasty antisemite yourself.”  And as wise Ben Franklin observed, “He who lies down with dogs, shall rise up with fleas.”

Why are you scratching your head, Dr. Paul?

Hoooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Oregon’s Fascist Immunization Bill SB 132 Passes

June 22, 2013

Oregon’s Fascist Democratic Governor, John Kitzhaber, has stated he will sign the Fascistic SB132 Bill which requires that parents who wish to opt out of the mandatory school vaccination program will now have to not merely sign a statement that they object because of religious or systems beliefs, but also get a signed statement from a physician attesting to that fact, or else present a certificate stating that they have watched an “educational” online video on the vaccinations, euphamistically called immunizations.

This vile infringement of the Bill of Rights, which in effect requires involuntary servitude for parents in the form of going to a physician (and paying for it, of course), or being forced to sit through a video that will undoubtedly tout the “benefits” of vaccination and then present a certificate to that effect, is being foisted on Oregon parents and their non-voting children by the Fascists Democrats in the Oregon Senate who voted en bloc 16-13 against the Repulicans to send it to the House and thence to the Governor. The Fascist Kitzhaber has said he will sign this heinous and anti-Libertarian piece of state coercion.

This is just another typical example of the Fascisti that represents the Democratic Party in the Oregon Legislature and Governor’s Mansion. These Immoral Fascists say nothing about the pesticides that are routinely used around Oregon schools, to which the unvoting children are forced to submit themselves, nor the vast amounts of pesticides, including atrazine which is banned in the EU, that the Timber Industry sprays all over Oregon, poisoning children and adults, while the Governor and State Legislators do nothing about it.

This bill passed the Senate 16-13, with every Democrat voting for it, and every Republican voting against it, save one who was absent.

Several press sources have stated that the national average for non-compliance with vaccine requirements in public schools is 1.2%, while in Oregon the rate is 6.4%. In Ashland Oregon, a Liberal Democratic stronghold with an Oregon State University campus, the rate of non-compliance is reported to be 25%. It’s interesting to note that in this highly-educated, Left-leaning Liberal city, the non-compliance rate is four times the statewide average. Quite a contradiction to the Fascist Democrat Governor’s position. It well shows what an arrogant Fascist is Governor John Kitzhaber, who is also an M.D.

The solution to this criminal violation of the Bill of Rights is to vote the Democratic Fascists out of office, vote in Libertarians who respect the Jeffersonian Bill of Rights which outlaws involuntary servitude, and to close the public schools, which are merely tools of the Fascists designed to brainwash and condition small children. Parents should seek alternative modes of education for their children, like home schooling.

Oregon’s Democratic Governor John Kitzhaber and the Oregon Democrats in the Legislature —- 100% pure unadulterated Fascists.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Enviro-Libertarianism: A New Necessary Political Outlook

December 7, 2012

It seems to Silverwolf that what the world and the West and especially America really needs is a new political movement which he would call “Enviro-Libertarianism”, a combination of the Libertarian maxim that 1) no person or group of persons may aggress against the Property Rights of any other person (including their own body which Libertarianism also regards as a Property Right) and 2) the principle that, as Ron Paul has said, no one has the right to pollute the air you breathe or the water you drink.

Silverwolf thinks that without bringing together the twin outlooks of a Jeffersonian-minarchist, radically free-market, Capitalism, and the environmental safeguards that would protect Individuals and their property, and indeed the whole planet and its animals, against the gross environmental pollution of the earth that has gone on for decades and is now accelerating beyond the Fail-Safe point, — yea, without this critical synthesis, there will be an envionmental chaos that will wipe out the human species. Only a merging of the Libertarian Philosophy of respect for the Individual and the sacredness of his Rights, magnificently codified by Wisechief Jefferson in the Bill of Rights, and the sane responsibility of the Environmental movement, that loves the earth and its animals trees and wants to preserve this miraculous paradise for future humans instead of raping it to benefit those corporations and their stockholders in bed with big government all over the world — only this merger will save both the planet, Capitalism, and Jeffersonian Republicanism.

Murray Rothbard pointed out that when private interests own resources like copper or timber in a truly free-market, they have to ration their annual harvest if they want their business enterprise to be self-sustaining, say for a hundred years, but when government controls huge swathes of resource-rich land and is in bed with major corporations, like the timber industry, and sells those resources to the corporations at below market prices, it encourages those industries they do business with to take as much as they can in as short a time as they can without regard to further sustainability. And so we have gross clearcuts all over the West with so-called Liberal Democrats like Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) calling for even bigger forest rapes or “thinnings”, with the “lumber” going to totalitarian Communist China. The Northwest Forests of America are being decimated by so-called Liberal Democrats like Peter DeFazio, Senators Jeff Merkley and Ron Wyden, and Governor John Kitzhaber, who have increased the cutting of the Forests in the past years under Democrat Obama, and who stand by and permit the dumping of thousands of pounds of toxic herbicides and pesticides on the forests in populated areas full of children. And think of all the innocent critters, birds and lil rascal varmints whose playgrounds and bliss have been wiped out by the collusion of DeFazio, Merkley, Wyden, Obama and Kitzhaber with the timber industry against the sacred Earth. They are destroying your Earth instead of defending it.

And this decimation of the forests is going on at exactly the same time that they and their fellow Democrats bleat their call for a carbon-tax that will come out of the pockets of the little guy, not the big logging interests.

Now tell me, Congressman DeFazio, if it is so important to institute a carbon-tax because the world is so close to the brink of destruction from global warming, then why is is alright to cut even one single tree if, as we have been told countless times, trees are carbon banks that store excess carbon-dioxide as they grow, only releasing it when they die and decay. The glaring contradiction and hypocrisy of these Forest Rapists is very clear.

Gee, Congressman DeFazio, if our environment is that fragile now that we need to be taxed, then why not call for an immediate logging moratorium on Federal lands, say for 30 years? Why is a tax crucial, but destroying even more carbon banks in the form of trees is not crucial? If global warming is real, that logging moratorium might make the whole difference in the planet and its inhabitants surviving. If global warming is not real, and the earth re-cools, and with 30 years of unmolested growth rebuilding some of the desecrated areas of the Forest, then perhaps commercial logging on private lands could be resumed if there were still any demand by then for wood as a construction material.

These fracking Congressional Democrats, in collusion with their blood brothers, the fracking Republicans, are destroying this miraculous planet and its miraculous life with their eternal bleat of “jobs” while they pick up their $150 grand-a-year for moving their lips and showering, these People’s Representatives who make 3.75 times approximately what the Average Adjusted Gross Income is for all Americans. Some “Evermans”, huh, these Senators and Congressmen and Presidents and Governors. Only Congressman Ron Paul had the integrity to pledge that he would only accept the Average AGI as his Presidential salary, in a wonderful gesture that illustrated the point that the President is not above the People but serves at the Will of the People. No more Emperor Nixons, thank you.

Sadly, the Green parties throughout the world seem to always side with the Left, or Liberal Democrat regimes and administrations, not realizing that Socialism and Central Planning is disastrous for a society and will always lead to poverty, as one sees in so many of Obama’s and Cardinal Geithner’s various financial and medical insurance schemes. In Australia the Greens side with that sadist and racist, Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of a country that stole its land from the Aborigines, and now won’t let in a few Tamils fleeing the horrendous human rights record of Sri Lanka, Muslim asylum seekers from Burma, and others fleeing Iran and Iraq, into a vast land the size of America which could easily absorb a few thousand more refugees. In America, the border cities are stuffed with so-called “illegal immigrants” by the hundreds of thousands and millions, but things don’t fall apart and go along pretty smoothly. Haven’t heard of any armed uprisings in L.A. by a “Mexican Liberation Front Army”, have you?. But fragile Australia can’t house a few thousand extremely brave immigrants, or let them go about on conditional release within the community, and instead keeps them in virtual prison camps offshore, living in horrendous conditions (tents in the rain that leak) as was recently reported on Radio Australia. Prime Minister Julia Gillard is a disgrace to Australia, a disgrace to the Libertarian tradition of British Liberalism which was one of the bright spots of the British Commonwealth, at least in theory, and, finally, a disgrace to the Human Race. Western Liberal Governments should step up and criticise this Harridan most harshly. Shame on Australia for its disgraceful and cruel treatment of these brave Human Beings

But I run before my horse to market.

The Green Parties, unfortunately, in Europe, in Australia, and in America invariably side with the Left. And, unfortunately, the Libertarian Party has failed to distinguish between what we would call “Corporate Libertarianism” which attempts to equate the Rights of Corporations with those of Individuals, and “Individual Libertarianism” which was the original concept of Jefferson and was most recently championed by Professor Murray Rothbard when he founded the modern Libertarian Party. Rothbard’s later severe break with the Koch Brothers perfectly illustrates the clear dichotomy between these two views, Individual Libertarianism vs Corporate Libertarianism. Whereas our Constitution speaks of “Individual Rights”, it makes no mention of Corporations whatsoever. Corporations were a cunning, but necessary, later invention, but in today’s political climate it is absolutely essential to distinguish between the Rights of Corporations and the Rights of Individuals, and it is the Rights of Individuals which must be put on top.

The Democrats and Republicans have reversed this natural order, putting the Corporation above the Individual, and this perversion of Jefferson’s intent in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights must be re-reversed.

Indeed, we’d put it to you that “Corporate Libertarianism” is not Libertarianism at all, but actually its opposite if you look at how it works in America and abroad. It’s a form of the old Mercantilism of the British Kings who would give the plum monopolies to their friends, relatives, and fawning minions.

So, the point is that Environmentalism must be linked with the Individual Libertarianism that seemed to animate Rothbard, and not with the Corporate Libertarianism which is the main braying call of the mainstream Republicans. Ron Paul represented such an Individual Rothbardian Libertarianism in our view.

Today’s news of a huge fall of one-third in the sperm count and quality in French males  in the past 30 years is a confirmation of the continuing domination of the corporations as they pollute the Earth and its People, and that sperm count fall in France, of course, mainly took place under the enlightened “progressive Left-wing’ French government in Europe, that stronghold of the Greens. We can see how well the Greens are protecting the Environment and the Earth and its People.

The only thing that will save the World now is a radical Environmentalism, that treats environmental polluters the way you’d treat rapists, married to a radically free-market Libertarianism, that takes the defense of the Individual’s Property Rights, including his body, as the only legitimate function of government.

Without this marriage the world is doomed.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf