Archive for the ‘history’ Category

Jefferson Stabbed in the Back: the Supreme Court’s Prayer Ruling

May 6, 2014

Jefferson’s beautiful Libertarian Republic has once again been stabbed in the back, and this time fatally. The blade entered through the wedge created by the overthrow of the necessity of Separation of Church and State, one of the key ingredients in Jefferson’s prescription for Human Liberty.

This overthrow was engineered by five Catholics, imposing their will on a nation that is predominantly Protestant, and which was created by Christian Radicals, mostly Protestant, fleeing the Church-State tyrannies that dominated and enslaved Europe for so long. It was overthrown by a court that does not have one Protestant or Atheist sitting on its bench, in a country which is overwhelmingly Protestant, though they are fractured into hundreds of different sects. And this is called representative justice.

But even the three Jews and one Catholic who did try to defend those Protestants who agree with Jefferson that a Church-State connection is one of the first steps toward tyranny, — even they put up a feeble resistance, and did not touch on the real violations in this case which are Involuntary Servitude, and Theft of taxpayer’s monies.

Moreover, the Justices did not address the great divisiveness and factionalism which this heinous ruling will bring about, the hatred and aggression between members of local communities who never before really thought or cared that much about their neighbor’s views on organized religions.

During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Catholics burned Protestants alive for their religious views and writings. Protestants burned Catholics alive for their religious views and writings. Protestants burned other Protestants alive for their religious views and writings. Catholics burned other Catholics alive for their religious views and writings.

And then came the Libertarian American Revolution, led by Thomas Jefferson and Thom Paine. “Build up a Wall of Separation between Church and State”, wrote Wisechief Jefferson.

And tragically, yesterday, the emasculated Supreme Court overthrew that Wall of Separation that has made America a country where people of all religions, agnostics, and atheists, can trade and fulfill their commodity needs in a generally orderly fashion, without religous differences having any significant impact on their market behaviour.

And this heinous overthrow was backed by that disgrace in the White House who was put there with the backing of leading Liberal Democrats, like Alan Dershowitz and John Rothmann, and supposed Liberal defenders of Civil Rights like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ADL. They helped put this religous fanatic in the White House, and it will be everyone in America who is a true Jeffersonian Libertarian and truly religious, and who doesn’t want to have the Deity’s name in any way connected with such an immoral government, who will suffer.

Jefferson taught us that government is a necessary evil, but an evil nevertheless. Why then would you want to contaminate “That which is Sacred” by any contact with such an immoral government as the American Government has become? And it has become that way because it moved away from the Libertarian Principles which motivated Thomas Jefferson, and the Radicals of the American Revolution. Those principles lead to both Civil Liberties, and Free-Market Capitalism. The two are intimately entwined.

But the legal reason why any official prayer before a townhall meeting, or any public-government event, should be illegal is that it is both a form of involuntary servitude, and a form of theft.

Prayer before a government event, like a city council meeting, violates the Constitutional prohibition against Involuntary Servitude, by forcing an attendee at a townhall meeting to either wait through the prayer, or remove themselves from the hall. But the reason they came to the meeting was to conduct secular, government business. In that their time and energy has been wasted in the course of their carrying out their civic duties or necessities, they have been forced into involutary servitude. You should not have your time wasted, or be forced to leave a public hall, because of someone else’s religious practices. And this is the one of the real reasons why this ruling by the Supreme Court is wrong, immoral, and unConstitutional.

The other reason is the theft of those taxpayer’s monies who agree with Jefferson on separation of church and state. While the prayers are being said in the townhall, the lights are running, the air conditioner may be going, the electricity is being used — and all, not in the service of legitimate government functions, but to further the religious propaganda of one of our major organized religions. These lights and power all cost money, and the fact that that tax money is being mulcted out of the Jeffersonian Citizens to pay for this violation of Separation of Church and State is actually Theft of Money, which in Libertarian Doctrine is a very serious, heinous crime.

In short, these prayer-pushers at public meetings are Slave Owners and Thieves, breeding factionalism and division among the American Public.

And the five disgraceful “Justices”, who voted for this vile overthrow of the Separation of Church and State, need to be impeached.

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

 

Advertisements

Murray Rothbard Endorses Norman Mailer: When Left Meets Right

April 30, 2014

Silverwolf had taken a vow of silence, until the silence of the voters will have silenced his nascent candidacy in the upcoming primaries.

But the network of interstices that link various thinkers sent us on a refresher quest of the key political, economic and issue positions of two of our favorite philosophers; they were thinkers, and very perceptive.

First, we rewatched Norman Mailer’s 77 min documentary, “Oh My America”. Really good. Chocked full of insights, like most of Mailer’s non-fiction writing. And deep insights, like Sartre, one after another until your exhausted from the mental pleasure. Mailer gives a lot of very valid observations of the times, which no one born after 1977 can ever really grasp, just like those born in the 1940s and 50s can’t existentially grasp what it was really like to live in the 1920s and 30s. In ancient times, men didn’t change very much from one generation to another. Now, it’s a completely different culture every 20 or 30 years.

At the same time, we began to reread Professor Murray Rothbard’s “For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto”. Like the Communist Manifesto, it lays down, in simple detail, the basic Libertarian principles, and the moral basis of many Libertarian viewpoints. It is a book that will really make you think, and even if you don’t agree with Libertarianism, you will know what it means after reading this work.

In the midst of all this, we began to rummage around for that book we knew we had on Norman Mailer’s campaign for the Mayoralty of New York City, but rummage though we might, we couldn’t find it. So we hurried to the internet and searched for Mailer’s 1977 campaign. There were several articles, but none that talked in great detail about the campaign and its strategy.

However, in one written by John Buffalo Mailer, his son, he mentions Murray Rothbard. And suddenly we thought, what would Rothbard have thought about this campaign? Did he have any contact with it?

With baited mind we googled Mailer and Rothbard, and there it was. An article written by Murray Rothbard, not only praising Mailer’s run, calling him the Libertarian alternative, but, for the first time ever in “Libertarian Forum”, formally endorsing anyone for public office. This was truly a marriage of Left and Right, and it was very heartening to hear this supposed Rightwing Fanatic endorsing a staunch Leftist.

Norman Mailer defined himself as a “Left Conservative”. He once said his views on birth control were to the Right of the Catholic Church. He contrasted the two types of Republican or Rightwing Conservatives as the “Principle Conservatives” and the “Flag Conservatives” Robert Taft would have fallen into the first class; just about every major Republican politician in the last 40 years has fallen into the latter class McCain, Palin, Boehner, Gingrich, Bachmann, McConnell, Christie, Perry (ha!ha!),
Schwartznegger, Guliani, the Bushes, the list goes on and on.

Mailer and Rothbard were a thousand miles above these people, although they obviously didn’t agree on many issues. It’s interesting too that while many are assaulting “Seccession” as a Rightwing nut issue (and personally, we think a Federal America would be stronger than 50 independent states, or having some secceed. Who’d want to exchange their currency and pay a bank 5% for the privilege every time you crossed a state line? And what about Federal Enforcement of Civil Rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights?), Norman Mailer was advocating in his campaign, not only that New York City should succeed from New York State and become the 51st State, but also that all the neighborhoods that make up New York should have their own autonomy, elections, run their own schools, etc. A devolution of power to local control.

Mailer quips in his documentary that the sad thing was that, up until a week before the election, he actually thought he was going to win, along with his co-campaigner and candidate, Jimmy Breslin, the newspaper journalist, who was running along with Mailer, for the head of the city council. Mailer ended up with 4% of the vote.

If you want to read Murray Rothbards paean of praise for Mailer’s candidacy, here it is:http://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/murray-n-rothbard/mailer-for-mayor/.

The Left and Right contra Fascismus.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Judge Ted Sleeps With Two Japanese War Criminals: Matsui and Tojo

March 23, 2014

Judge Ted was reminiscing with Silverwolf about the time he slept with two Japanese War Criminals.

It was in Osaka, and Judge Ted was recuperating from jungle-rot of the feet in a large hospital ward, in the center of which was a cage that housed the  condemned Japanese War Criminals, Matsui and Tojo.

Judge Ted went up to them and tried to engage them in conversation. Matsui was quite willing. “He was very intelligent”, the Judge relates, “and spoke perfect English. He was also in great physical shape, and he could do more push-ups at 70 than I could do at 19. He seemed like a nice guy.”

But what about the fact that his troops murdered an estimated 300,000 Chinese civilians in the Rape of Nanking? Silverwolf queries.

“Well, he was far behind the troops. He couldn’t do anything about it. And they’d called him out of retirement to serve again, which he didn’t want to do, but didn’t have much choice.”

Yeh, sure. These War Criminals are never responsible for the mass murder of women and children, many burned alive or buried alive, or the mass rapes. Given the estimated 10 million Chinese civilians who were murdered by Japanese troops, it’s laughable to believe that this was some random act of cruelty perpetrated by rogue elements, and that the Generals knew nothing about it, or couldn’t control it, or were morally aghast at it. No, they wanted it and ordered it.

Matsui also told Judge Ted, “You know, if they don’t hurry up and hang me, I’ll soon be dead anyway.” Matsui was 70.

And what about Tojo? asks Silverwolf.

“Oh, he was scared! He wouldn’t look at any of us, just down at the ground. Some of the guys would dangle there dog-tags in front of him, taunting him, and reminding him that he was going to be hung. They also criticised me for talking to Matsui, but, I don’t know, I kinda liked the guy.”

Well, Judge Ted is a forgiving guy, unless you’re a Republican.

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Libertarians Crush The Democrats in Florida Special Election

March 17, 2014

Few political pundits recall that it was Dionysius of Halicarnassus who said that “history is philosophy teaching by example”. Certainly few Democratic pundits remembered that adage, so they were surprised by their very significant defeat in the Florida Special Election for the House last week. Had they realized the hatred of American Individualists for a constant barrage and assault on their personal energies in order to fulfill unConstitutional demands inflicted on them by the State, they might have anticipated the results. But they were obviously fooling themselves.

The Democrats lost, not because of the Republicans, but because of the Libertarian vote for Lucas Overby, which came in at 4.8%. This was two and two-thirds as much as the difference between the Democrats and Republicans, and unusually high for a Libertarian candidate, who normally garner 1-2% of the vote, though there have been a few cases where they topped 5%. This shows that the work of Libertarian writers and thinkers, along with the campaign ideas of Ron Paul, and combined with the obvious incompetence of the Democrats in everything they touch, has brought a lot of people to see the necessity of voting Libertarian. Additionally, we’d guess that a lot of younger voters, who voted for Obama, now realized they voted for a propagandized Image who has burdened them with trillions of new dollars of debt, imposed a healthcare mandate on them that will take most of their spare cash for years to come if they have any kind of decent income, and made it even harder for poor youths to get any kind of work through jacking up the minimum wage law. We’d bet a lot of these former Obama voters just didn’t turn up, or moved over to the true Classical Liberalism of the Libertarians. Obama’s enforcement of the pot laws, in the face of so many states legalizing it, or semi-legalizing it, shows the Youth better than anything else what an old reactionary fogey is the President.

And even the Republicans were scared. The Libertarian Frankenstein which Ron Paul sowed together and revivified has stormed out of the castle and is terrorizing the political landscape all over America, and the Republican’s even had to have Senator Rand Paul call in his support for candidate Jolly, the very son of the man who energized that Frankenstein. Both the Republicans and the Democratic peasants were out with their flaming flambeaus, looking for the giant who might topple them. The fact that the Libertarian got 266% of the difference between the Republican winner and the Democratic loser must scare the hell out of both parties, and you can bet they’ll start to incorporate some of Libertarian rhetoric in their speeches, since they are both parties of conforming lemmings, with political dogmas and image-making based on false, un-Jeffersonian, ideologies.

It was also clear they were scared from the fact that the media made little or no mention of the unusually high Libertarian vote, not wanting to call attention to the fact, which attention might serve to make it “cool” to vote Libertarian.

Libertarian Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson got roughly 1% of the vote in 2012. A Libertarian gets almost 5% in a bellweather House election in 2014. It shows you what 17 months of big State Socialism does to people’s psyches.

This is just the beginning.

Hoooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

If the Ukraine Were Mexico: A Parallelogram Situation Fantasy

March 9, 2014

Silverwolf has just read the BBC headline that a Professor had said that, yes, the invasion or incursion into Crimea by probably Russian troops was a violation of International Law. Duh, of course it is.

But so is overthrowing a democratically elected government by force with mobs murdering police, and then tolerating Nazis in five of the cabinet positions in the new, overthrown government. Liberal Democrats would condemn to High Hell any Nazi or KKK elements that showed up at a Tea Party or Libertarian or Ron Paul rally and patrolled the crowd with baseball bats and Swastika armbands, but here is Barack Obama and Diplomat Nuland funelling over $5 billion dollars to a government that is largely Nazi and which tolerates many Nazi groups. Ron Paul was criticized by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an enabler of Fascism; I wonder what they would call President Obama’s actions in installing Nazis in a government overthrown by violent Anarchists and Nazis who would have been mowed down in America if they had got anywhere near the White House, and Silverwolf wouldn’t have had much sympathy for them, because that is not the way you change government. You do it through elections, or through non-violent Gandhian methods like the Boycott or the General Strike or the picket line or the sit-in, as long as you don’t block the fire exits. But when you storm buildings, and burn police to death, and beat police armed only with shields… well, for America to legitimize that with its support is a great tragedy. And for jolly Old England too, the birthplace of Libertarianism and Free-Market (along with Holland), or at least as Free-Market as it was possible to be in those mercantilist days, when the Monarchy was the equivalent of the Congress, Presidency, Supreme Court and Federal Reserve combined into one half-senile (from inbreeding) megalomaniac.

So Putin’s incursion into a region that would be almost certainly pro-Russian in a Democratic election is called a violation of international law, as it probably technically is, but Obama’s backing of violent Nazis who overthrow a Democratic election is honky-dorey, huh? That’s your “liberal Democrat” Obama.

Obama is a lunatic, and he is bringing us to the brink of a world war, for no valid reasons. Elections were coming up soon in Ukraine. If Yanuko had been tried for his crimes, that would have been an orderly, legalistic and just way of handling the situation. But violently overthrowing him, and then blaming Putin for putting his troops in when a Nazi has just been installed as Defense Minister, and another as Chief Prosecutor, is just insane. What is going on in that brain of Obama’s? Any half-drunk bar room philosopher could have predicted this one. Of course Putin wasn’t going to sit around and do nothing when, as Professor Steven Cohen of NYU and Princeton so aptly put it, you’ve moved the Berlin Wall from Germany to the edge of Russia. And the NATO threat to give missiles to the new Nazi Government? How did our great statesman President think Russia was going to react to that one after the history of World War II? That heckler who heckled Obama about when was World War III going to start really hit the nail on the head.  The President tried to laugh it off, rather hollowly we thought, but that heckler was more realistic than our Chief Executive. The President, this so-called Liberal who supports Nazi thugs in government, has rekindled the Cold War in a few short days with his stupidity. Add ‘im to Aretha’s Chain of Fools.

Silverwolf, as you know, loathes Vlad Putin for his equivalent of a war crime in aiding Syria, Iran, and Libya under the War Criminal Ghaddafi, as well as his murder of a defenseless whale, worth much more than his miserable carcass, but he’d never watched Putin in detail, except for a few minutes of his recent press conference. So he went back and watched the entire hour-long conference, and was fascinated.

There are several striking things about Putin. First, he looks like he doesn’t have a wrinkle on his face. Make up? Or a guy who sleeps soundly at night. Secondly, he talks very fluently, like a lawyer. No Ron Paul-esque flounderings around like a beached seal, filled with “you knows” for Putin; he had very few pauses. And he seemed to know exactly what he wanted to say. Silverwolf nyet knows Rooskee, so he didn’t know precisely what he was saying, but he sounded calm, and not very vicious. Also, he seemed to be giving quite depthful analyses and reasons for what he was doing, building the case that a democratically-elected President, who had been violently overthrown, had requested that he intervene in his country. That sounds pretty International-Law-ish to Silverwolf. If President Obama were overthrown in an invasion by Cuba, or overthrown by violent mobs funded by Cuba, and he fled to Canada and asked the Canadian Prime Minister to intervene to protect the lives of Americans from Cuban mobs, wouldn’t that be justified? So Putin’s incursion into Crimea might be technically a violation of International Law, but Crimea was artifically annexed to Ukraine by Krushchev (Nikita S. — and please don’t forget the “S” so you don’t confuse him with another Nikita Krushchev), so why is the world suddenly so eager to acknowledge the validity of that action by the Soviet dictator of that day on this issue?

But what was most striking about what he was saying was that most of it was interesting. How many politicians could you listen to who could give you an interesting and depthful analysis of a current critical situation that sounded like a deep-thinking university professor? Putin was interesting; Obama is boring.

Some of his dodges, though, were a bit ridiculous. He claimed that no Russian troops had entered Crimea, and those armed men were all pro-Russian people’s militias. You know, you can buy those uniforms in an army surplus store, he argued. But he said it in way that showed he obviously didn’t believe it himself.

The other thing about Putin is his appearance. He has such a characteristically Russian face, if there is such a thing, you could see why they picked him for the KGB. And he has such a weird look in his eye when he looks straight at the camera, and appears to be ever-so-slightly cross-eyed, that it gives him the appearance of intense, almost fanatical, concentration. Finally, his face is extremely animated as he talks, the eyebrows going up and down, the cheeks scrunching. At one moment, a reporter’s musical cellphone goes off, and Putin looks a little exasperated, but is courteous and waits till the woman leaves the room with a comment like “pretty music”, but you could see that the King of the Russian Empire wasn’t too pleased about a stupid reporter interrupting his press conference. Silverwolf can’t blame him.

So Silverwolf hates to say it, but he almost liked Putin, or at least, was quite impressed with his intelligence, and the depth of his thinking. He can see why Russians could like him, and he certainly isn’t letting the flies grow on him when Nazis are coming to power right on his borders; Nazis armed with nuclear missiles and backed by Germany. Putin really kneed the hypocrisy of the West in the groin with his incisive comments, especially after all the garbage one has heard being drummed out in the U.S. press and the BBC. And Silverwolf is damn glad those ethnic Russians and Tartars in the Crimea will have Russian soldiers around to protect them from the Nazi gangs roaming around Kiev, now being given legitimacy by the Obama Administration by calling them the Provisional Government.

Now, let’s imagine a parallelogram fantasy.

What if… in North Mexico a movement arises calling itself L’Azteca Action, which claims that Gringos, Americanos, Protestants, and Capitalists run the entire economy of the region, grinding the poor Mexicans into the dirt, and that they should be expelled and their property confiscated, and that the People want a pure Mexican Mexico. They advocate making Spanish the only legal language. Then there are several assaults on Protestants by gangs of Catholics resulting in hospitalizations, and a general hostility is whipped up against American retirees who are “bleeding the land and El Pueblo Mexicano.” Capitalism is denounced, and murderers of American civilians during the Revolution, like Pancho Villa with his raids in New Mexico, are glorified. Villa is called a great hero, a Mexican Patriot, and his crimes are overlooked. Gangs of thugs armed with baseball bats and dressed in T-shirts bearing pictures of Villa, and the symbol of Villa’s militia which had carried out atrocities against women and children during the Revolution, patrol the streets as “security”, and the chief of police of the entire region as well as the chief prosecutor are L’Azteca Action party members.

Then it turns out that Russia has funnelled over $5 billion to L’Azteca to stir up trouble in the region, and suddenly tens of thousands of terrified American retirees, Protestants, and businessmen are fleeing to the border and stampeding into America. There is extensive media footage of American ex-pats kissing American soil upon arrival at the U.S. Border at Calexico and Naco. When L’Azteca gangs begin to overrun government buildings in areas where democratic local elections had protected the Rights of Americans, Protestants, and Capitalists, and a Party member, who has called these three groups “scum”, heads the Security Ministry, then President Obama decides to send American Troops into those border regions where Americans, Protestants, non-Mexicans, Capitalists, etc. form 70%-plus majorities, to protect American Citizens, and there are welcoming crowds lining the roads, waving American flags. In response to the American “invasion” of Mexico, Russian President Putin warns America that it is violating International Law and there will be a heavy price to pay. The rhetoric and name-calling escalates on both sides. Defiant, the American President maintains his troops in Northern Mexico, and brings in even more troops to protect other non-Fascist regions. Putin, claiming the moral high ground, and talking about morality and principle, offers to supply L’Azteca Action with nuclear weapons, according to a NATO-like treaty the Russians have with Mexico to come to its aid if its sovereignty was ever threatened, and in order to “protect the Mexican People and show that infringements of International Law have their costs.” And, inevitably, when L’Azteca Action, supported by all the Latin American nations, gets its missiles, it immediately demands the return of the lands stolen by America during the Mexican-American War which the Great Libertarian Henry David Thoreau went to jail resisting. That includes California, Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada. Just give us that, and there will be Peace, cries L’Azteca Action, and massive, violent mobs all across Northern Mexico, whipped up by State media propaganda, demonstrate in support. War Against the Capitalists, Gringos, English-speakers, and any Mexican against our Holy Cause! Liberate Nevada! Free California. New Mexico for the Mexicans!

And soon the missiles start flying.

Putin’s incursion is illegal, and so was Yanuko’s overthrow. But the practical effect of Obama’s actions is to throw Russia into a huge insecurity. After all, this could well mean NATO missiles in the hands of a Nazi Regime right on Russia’s borders; a Regime, backed by Germany, which had fought with Nazi Germany against Russia, and murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians, while glorifying mass murderers of Poles and Jews like Stefan Bandera and Chmelnitsky. Of course this was going to make Russia paranoid, and make all the ethnic Russians, and what was left of the Jews and Poles in Ukraine after the decimations of World War II, very insecure. Any idiot could have figured that out, but Obama couldn’t. This action shows that he is not fit to be President, and out of touch with reality. This is a very dangerous miscalculation by the President, and shows his lack of true Statesmanship.

Put yourself in the Russian’s place, America. Would you want a fanatical, bloodthirsty Pancho Villa to have nuclear weapons on your border, pointing at you? That is what Russians must be feeling right now. The Bipartisan Fascists, led by President Obama, have set the Cold War and World Progress back about a quarter-century with their and his stupid, puerile, and very dangerous actions. What a great tragedy for the world, and for America. And what a blundering fool is the President of the United States.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Obama Backs The Ukrainian Nazis: At Your Throat or At Your Feet

March 7, 2014

There’s an old saying about Nazis that Barack Obama seems to have forgotten or never heard: Nazis, they’re either at your throat or at your feet. By backing the new Nazi so-called “Government” of the Svoboda Party and the Right Sektor in Kiev, President Obama has committed one of the greatest political mistakes of this century so far, and it is truly disgusting, but not surprising, to see the sickening hypocrisy of Obama, John Kerry, and Ms. Rodham as they carry out this destabalization of Russia’s border region by bringing to power, and endorsing, a regime with racist values so sickening, that they are fit for the KKK. In America, anyone who exhibits the slightest racism is condemned by the Democrats as some unspeakable horror, but here they are staunchly supporting a bunch of Jew-hating, and Russian-hating racists.

The following excellent article by Prof. Mark Chussodovsky not only lists the proofs for the assertion that this is a Nazi regime, but also proves it with photos. Here is the Racist Tanybuk giving the Nazi salute, and here is a beaming Nuland standing smiling with the Nazi racist Scum. Obama has legitimized Fascism, and here is the proof.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-u-s-has-installed-a-neo-nazi-government-in-ukraine/5371554

The BBC too finally did a report on the Nazi elements in Svoboda and Right Sektor, interviewing the head of a militia that is tied to the Svoboda party. He blamed Ukraines problems on the economic control of the economy by “Russians, Jews, and Poles”. So we can see what is coming. These racist divisionists, who breed discord and hate in society, now control the Defense Ministry and five top cabinet posts in the regime, and you can be sure they will follow the same plan as the Nazis did in Germany when they took over. Anyone wanting to know in detail how this was done should read the vital work, “The Nazi Seizure of Power” by William Sheridan Allen, published by Franklin Webb, inc., 1973. In this work, Allen describes how the Nazis took over a medium-sized German town, mainly by getting all the Socialists, Social Democrats, and anyone who opposed them fired. Part of the reason they took over too was the namby-pamby whimpish resistance of the Socialists and Social Democrats in comparison to the fanaticism of the Nazis. The Ukrainian Nationalist Nazis plan to eliminate many government positions in the name of saving money and purging corrupt officials, but you can be sure that the axe will fall on ethnic Russian, Jews, Poles, and Communists. The Nazis will control the cops; they will be the cops, and they ain’t going to stop there. These Nazis want violence, and anyone who thinks they will not exhibit their violence once they’re in power should watch the BBC report on them.

The following informative posts by anti-Fascist Historian Dave Emory, in addition to those of his we mentioned in our previous post, also round out the picture of the Nazi stink in Kiev that the Western media is ignoring. The Confederate Stars and Bars is now disgustingly displayed in Kiev Square, and Peace Street has been renamed after the mass murder’s Nazi batallion. Thanks, Obama. You’ve stabbed the Nazi’s 40 million victims in the back, and condoned and encouraged the modern Skinhead movement, while managing to re-inflame the long-embered Cold War.

http://spitfirelist.com/news/confederate-flags-in-kiev-and-peace-street-renamed-for-the-einsatzgruppe-nachtigall/

http://spitfirelist.com/news/ounb-heirs-hold-prominent-ministerial-posts-in-ukraine/

As you know from previous posts, Silverwolf is no lover of Vladimir Putin, but in this case, we think he is right. The deposed democratically-elected President has been overthrown by mobs of anarchists; he carried over 70% of the vote in Crimea and close to that in the East according to the BBC map of how Ukraine voted, and here are a bunch of racist Nazis threatening Russians, Jews, and Poles. They murder six cops in the demonstrations. They rename a street after the batallion that fought with the Germans and carried out mass murder of Poles and Jews, they daub Nazi slogans on a statue of Lenin, and wear the armbands of the OUN/B Ukrainian Nationalists who fought with Hitler, but Obama and the West and the Western Media are completely silent, showing how deeply corrupt is the Democratic Party, the West in general, and the Western news media.

Silverwolf watched Putin addressing the press, and it was the first time he’d ever watched him during an interview. One noticed the animation of his visage as he went through an entire series of facial movements, while he sounded like he was talking rather calmly. He pointed out the hypocrisy of the Americans, and explained that a democratically-elected President who had been violently deposed had asked for his intervention, that there were close cultural, ethnic, and economic ties to the Russian population in Ukraine, and he intended to go in and protect those people if they were threatened or killed.

President Obama seems to have no inkling whatsoever of the psychological impact  in Russia of having 20 million of their people murdered in Hitler’s war, and the rage that must be welling up in people who have heard from their grandparents and parents what the Germans, with the aid of their Ukrainian OUN/B allies, did during World War II. Obama seems to have huge lapses of judgement that make him a real liability as President. We always thought that a man who could attend for twenty years a congregation that gave its man of the year award to the racist and Jew-baiter, Louis Farrakhan, must be either very callous, very dull, or a crypto-anti-Semite. Maybe he’s all three?

Obama has managed to rekindle the Cold War in order to destabilize a democratically-elected regime. If Yanukovich was corrupt, and he sure was, he should have been tried and jailed, as would have happened in an orderly, democratic or republican society with a Bill of Rights. But he was overthrown by a mob led by racist Nazis, and Vladimir Putin is not going to sit around with his finger up his ear and let the Nazis destabilize his Western borders. And by the way, if Obama is such a lover of Democracy, why does he object to Crimea holding a referendum on whether to join Russia or not? We’re told the Crimea is an “autonomous region” within Ukraine, so if they are truly autonomous, why should they not vote democratically on their future? If Obama truly believed in Democracy, he would endorse this referendum. But he’s as wooden and robotic as George Dubbyah; just another immoral politican.

Unfortunately, it’s just a matter of time we think before the Nazi stink starts rising from Kiev and its environs. At your throat or at your feet is no empty observation.

Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Hilary Clinton have revived the Nazi State, to their great shame, and the misery of all the non-Nazis in the Ukraine. They will regret it, and be damned and reviled when the final history of Fascism and Nazism is written.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Obama Backs Ukrainian Fascists While Putin Gets One Right

March 2, 2014

You have to wonder at the stupidity of Barack Obama, as he threatens Russia by backing the remnants of the OUN/B Ukrainian Nazis who fought with Hitler in WWII and carried out the genocide of the Ukrainian Jews. The virulent Jew-hatred of these new Nazis is evident by their many public statements, some pronounced in the Parliament. Anti-Fascist Historian Dave Emory has done a capital job at documenting the links between the old OUN/B Nazis and the modern “protest” movement in the Ukraine, and the posts listed below provide that documentation.

One wonders how the U.S. Federal Marshals and SWAT teams would have reacted if racist mobs stormed and burned Federal Government buildings, burned alive and murdered Federal Marshals and National Guardsmen, and tried to stage a coup in one of the Fifty U.S. States. Say too that it came out that the overthrowers of our U.S. democratically-elected government were receiving funds from the Soviet Union, as the Ukrainian movement has received funds from the U.S. A.I.D. program, and that a top advisor to the Russian President had been intercepted in a phone conversation saying whom they thought should be installed in power after that State’s government had been overthrown. One wonders how the American Public would have reacted if the news got out that Russia, or Saudi Arabia, or Japan were backing the anarchists with money, and had had secret cables intercepted telling whom they wanted put into power after the overthrow of the government. Obama can dish it out, but you wonder how he would take that.

You should watch some of the footage of these anarchists setting policemen on fire, and beating them with wooden clubs, setting up catapaults to launch Molotov Cocktails, metal projectiles, and paving stones into the police lines, and spraying the police with who-knows-what. How would such treatment be tolerated by, say, the L.A.P.D. that beat Rodney King?

Certainly the government these people were trying to overthrow was a corrupt regime, as is Russia itself, and unfortunately as are most countries around the world, almost 240 years after Thomas Jefferson’s Glorious Revolution, as Glorious in its way as Oliver Cromwell’s, which put a stop to absolute tyrannical Monarchy, that accursed institution. (However, England now wears it well, and even Lord Bertrand Russell supported the Monarchy, on the grounds that it was a sort of Fourth Estate, that could express its opinion if it didn’t approve of the way government was running England, and carry a lot of weight with the public. In other words, the modern Monarchy was a further check on absolute power by any one branch of government.) And it looked like the government used snipers to deliberately murder demonstrators who were not immediately threatening any police. But after the burning, beatings, and murder of other police officers, it’s little wonder they resorted to murderous force. After all, this is Ukraine and Russia, not Mayberry with Andy Griffith and Don Knotts as cops. Russia lost 20 million because of Hitler and his Ukrainian allies. They haven’t forgotten that fact like Obama has.

However, it’s obvious that the Democrat Obama is backing a bunch of Racists that would be right at home in the Ol’ Mississippi and Alabam of the pre-1960s; Racists and xenophobes whose neo-Nazi philosophy would fit right in with the KKK. This is well documented in Historian Emory’s latest posts on spitfirelist.com, http://spitfirelist.com/. the first two giving historical documentation of the Nazi roots and xenophobia of the protest movement, and the last the most recent post as we write, and as the BBC reports the Ukrainian Army on alert. This information is critical in seeing the situation in its true light, and not as just a Libertarian Free Speech movement going up against Clark Kerr at U.C. Berkeley, or the police riot of the Democrat Criminal, Mayor Richard Daley, and his Chicago police, clubbing Vietnam War Protesters, while War Criminal Democrat Hubert Humphrey spoke to the Democratic Convention. Here are Emory’s documentary posts on the Neo-Nazis that Obama is supporting with U.S. Taxpayer’s dollars: http://spitfirelist.com/news/the-ideology-and-electoral-gravitas-of-swoboda-ukrainian-heirs-to-the-ounb/,http://spitfirelist.com/news/more-on-ounb-influence-on-the-ukrainian-political-opposition/, http://spitfirelist.com/news/ukraine-update-pierre-omidyar-glenn-greenwalds-financial-angel-helped-finance-coup-swedish-neo-nazi-milieu-of-carl-lundstrom-assisting-ounb-heirs/,

And you thought they were Libertarian Saints.

If these Nazis are allowed to overthrow and establish their own racist government by force, it will be the first time in the Western World since the days of the Segregationist South that a far-Right Nazi power has held sway over an entire country or huge region. There was no law in the old South, but Robert Kennedy busted that all apart. This is a return to that Old South, and Obama is so limited in vision, that he can’t see that incredibly significant fact. It is a return to the Dark Age of Segregation, of Racism, and its ultimate crime against Libertarianism, Slavery.

What a nerve Obama has to threaten Russia. Russia may be a cesspool of corruption, of police torture with impunity, of anti-Libertarian laws against Gays, of xenophobia and anti-Semitism, and Putin is a War Criminal without doubt for his actions in Syria and transfering weapons to the Hezballah terrorist Racists via Iran, but on this issue he is right to flex the Russian military as a deterrent to the Ukrainian Nazis, and it’s pretty obvious that in Eastern Ukraine and the Crimea, the people overwhelmingly want to keep their ties with Russia. Maybe they can see how miserable life in the  racist EU is, and they like the perks of aligning with Russia. Living under Putin would be much better than living under Hitler, or one of his Bandera proxies.

So Obama and Nuland can plot regime change with their favorite Nazis and threaten Russia, and Obama can talk of “peaceful engagement with the opposition”, much as Neville Chamberlain did, with the result of 40 million murdered, while at the same time that Fascist-lover Hypocrite in the White House can maintain his embargo of Cuba, because of its ties with Russia. What a double standard, and what an illustration of the President’s lack of brains. He may be the clever lawyer, but he has no wisdom, or seemingly no awareness of the political impact of his actions and words.

And now he backs Nazi Racists. What a shower.

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Kenneth Bae or Bomb-Bay

February 9, 2014

The news that kidnapped American Kenneth Bae has been returned from hospital to a labor-camp in North Korea is merely further evidence of the callous sadism of this group of gangsters known as the Government of North Korea. And the namby-pamby response of President Obama and Ms. Rodham is merely further evidence of their impotence as world leaders.

President Obama should give an ultimatum to the North Korean Government Criminals: either free Kenneth Bae within 24 hours, or have your Government buildings in Pyongyang carpet-bombed by drones and or planes. This gang of criminals has kidnapped and is working to death an American Citizen, and if his Life means so little to the Administration that they are not prepared to undertake military action against the Regime that would cost no American lives but only the lives of the guilty North Korean Government Criminals who have kidnapped Kenneth Bae, then it is an indication of how little the Individual means to the current Administration as compared to what He meant to Jefferson and Madison.

President Obama should stop messing around, and take this opportunity to inflict a blow on Fascism that would redound throughout the annals of History. He should bomb the hell out of those Totalitarian Fascist Murderers.

It should be Kenneth Bae or bomb-bay.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

A Century of Butchery: A German Deserter’s War Experience

December 11, 2013

In a few weeks, we will mark a century of butchery as bad as man has ever known, made more sinister by great leaps in technological knowledge. The “Art” of War — figuring out new ways to kill Human Beings — has developed to a pitch that human effort in battle is miniscule compared to the effort of machines and automated weaponry.

But this century of butchery, we should not forget, began in 1914 with the start of World War I, and few youths of today may be intimately connected with the horrendous reality that existed in Europe, just 36,525 days back from January 1, 2014.

To grasp that terrible reality, there are few texts better than “A German Deserter’s War Experience” by Anonymous, the record of a German soldier who was in near-constant battle for several years, and who fought at the Marne and Verdun. If you want to know the true reality of war, the immense senseless suffering, then it behooves you to read this work.

In it you can see the utter callousness of the generals and the general staff, and the officers, towards the common soldier. Anonymous was a sapper, an engineering soldier who put up wire, laid mines, floated pontoons across rivers, etc., but he also fought with the Infantry. He describes what hand-to-hand combat does to people, the ferocious bayonet fights, and the callous indifference to corpses quickly acquired. He describes laying a field of explosives, then inducing the French Infantry to attack across it, and then detonating it, so that 200-300 Frenchmen were blown in an instant into body parts which rained down, and hung in the trees. He describes the German officer who blew up a bridge crammed with both French Cavalry and German foot soldiers desperately trying to retreat across the bridge. He notes how not one officer in his regiment was a casualty, while few draftees remained alive in his original batallion. He points out that the soldiers had to sleep on the damp ground, with only a thin cloak, while the officers had sleeping bags and woolen blankets. He notes the almost universal disillustionment and regret at having volunteered by both youths and old men, who had been brainwashed into sacrificing their lives for the “Fatherland”.

Contrarywise, he notes, after having been moved from a very violent to a very quiet part of the front, the lack of confrontation between both sides and the wish to keep it on those terms by both French and German soldiers. They even fraternised at night, exchanging gifts, and shaking hands when they parted. In one instance, the only nearby well was located in the middle of a no-man’s land, but both the French and the Germans went out and used it, and waited patiently while those ahead filled their canisters, saluting when they parted.

Anonymous finally has enough of the war, and plans an escape which will have the reader on the edge of his seat. We’ll leave that bit untold.

Perhaps the only flaw in the book is the last paragraph of the work, which throws out a specifically political (and in our view incorrect) viewpoint. But having gone through what this fellow went through, you might think the same way.

“A German Deserter’s War Experience”, which can be read at archive.org, reminds us of the utter callousness and horror of war, and war waged merely to satisfy the aristocracies, military elites, and munitions-makers of Europe. It portraits a reality that must never be forgotten.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

A Forgotten British Libertarian: William Bailward on Welfare

November 25, 2013

The more things change, the more they stay the same.That certainly is a dictum to keep in mind as we see the beginnings of the unraveling of the welfare State under our current government

But the horrendous mess the Democrats and Republicans have created in America is no surprise, given the history of welfare in the English-speaking world since Queen Elizabeth I.

In reading William Bailward’s book of essays on what Americans would call welfare, one was struck by how similar the situations and the mentality of Bailward’s day were, circa 1905-1912, with those of present day America.

Bailward’s “The Slippery Slope and Other Papers on Social Subjects” gives a clear picture of the problems that confronted British welfare from 1601 until Bailward’s day, and those problems are indistinguishable from those we now find in America, with 47 million on food stamps, the dollar buying a quarter of what it did in 2000, and 51% of the population receiving a check from the government every month — the exact percentage by which Obama was re-elected. Bailward had obviously not only thought about government welfare a great deal, but he also served as Chairman of a Board of Guardians, which was the body of people who would hear welfare cases directly from the applicants, and then make a dispensation. Bailward must have heard thousands of applicants in his career, which also included election to the British Parliament, and serving on a Board in one of the poorer sections of London. He knew welfare, both in theory and practice, and the insights in his essays should be carefully pondered by both Libertarians and members of the Bipartisan Party who want to raise the standard of living in America.

Bailward traces the history of British welfare back to the days of Elizabeth I, who, in 1601, instituted the Poor Law, which basically said that everyone who was “impotent” (i.e. unable to work or support themselves) should receive aid, while those who were able-bodied should be found work. Sounds a lot like modern America, don’t it.

The results of this were disastrous. For centuries England struggled with terrible poverty amongst its masses, and for many decades virtually everyone in the countryside was on a parish dole. The care of the “impotent” came to be the main function of the Poor Law, and the bit about finding work for the able-bodied was generally ignored. “Pauperism”, a concept Bailward talks much of, was rampant, and a multitude of British thinkers and artists, from John Locke to Lord Byron, wrote out their own schemes for raising the appalling standard of living

This sorry state continued until 1834, when the poor law was revised, and the equal eligibility of the impotent and the able-bodied was changed to make the working man eligible first for aid. This led to a large drop in the number of paupers.

There are several concepts that Bailward discusses which most American Libertarians probably overlook when considering welfare.

Firstly, there was the divergence between “indoor” and “outdoor” relief. Indoor meant the workhouse or poorhouse, where the recipients had to live in the institution to receive aid. Once “outdoor” aid got popular — aid which one could go and pick up and then go home — the number of paupers greatly increased.

Secondly, Bailward makes the very important distinction between “poverty” and “pauperism”. Poor people, or people living in poverty, who worked, lived frugally, and though poor managed to support themselves, are distinguished from “paupers”, who lacked any ambition to get off the dole, often drifted around, spending the days chatting or lounging on the parish lawns, and generally made a career out of cadging money, food, or clothing from various charities or government bodies. “Pauperism” sounds a lot like many of America’s homeless, although their ranks have been greatly swelled since the Bank Bailout Bill under Bush which Obama and most Democrats and Republicans voted for, and which has inflated the cost of necessities three or four times for Americans (and foreigners). Many of the homeless under Obama do not have pauperistic attitudes, but were overwhelmed by his and the Fed’s Inflation.

Bailward is a great believer in private charities giving aid, instead of Boards of Guardians dispensing goverment tax monies. And as in America, the tax rates did nothing but continuously go up in his day.

As Bailward was writing these essays, England was in the process of shifting away from the Poor Law and its 1834 Revision, into a system where each type of welfare had its own branch. For example, they began an old age pension scheme which gave everyone over 70 a pension. Then they had a school feeding program. And then various other programs were introducted. Bailward laments that the various bureaucracies that handled each new type of welfare had no coordination with each other, so that many people were receiving multiple benefits under multiple programs, and there was no central statistical bureaucracy that could keep track of it all. With the coming of the computer, that problem should theoretically be gone.

All in all, William Bailward’s “The Slippery Slope” is a work which all Libertarians should peruse, especially those interested in welfarism. Its discussions will broaden your understanding.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf