Archive for the ‘law’ Category

Uzis for French Jews: The Libertarian Solution

July 22, 2014

We warned long ago that Euro-Socialism would lead to racism, and racism where there is gun control leads to racist riots like the Jew-hater Riots in Paris we’ve just read about in the news. The Islamo-Nazi Jew-haters are free to riot in Paris, burning Jewish-owned shops and a synagogue, while the police refuse to gun them down, and the Jews are denied the inalienable Natural Right to defend themselves with guns. Do you think this would have happened if Jews were free to own Uzis in France?

Under Libertarian Law, you have the Right to defend yourself if any man or group of men assault your person or property. If France had followed Libertarian Law, there would have been dozens less racists infesting France after this riot than before.

The French Government, which has failed to protect Jews and has denied them the right to gun down those trying to murder them, should immediately issue an order that all Jews in France be permitted to own automatic and semi-automatic weapons like Uzis, and the Israeli Government should ship them there.

This is the final solution to Racist Nazi Property-Rights Criminals. The Libertarian Solution.

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

Advertisements

Jefferson Stabbed in the Back: the Supreme Court’s Prayer Ruling

May 6, 2014

Jefferson’s beautiful Libertarian Republic has once again been stabbed in the back, and this time fatally. The blade entered through the wedge created by the overthrow of the necessity of Separation of Church and State, one of the key ingredients in Jefferson’s prescription for Human Liberty.

This overthrow was engineered by five Catholics, imposing their will on a nation that is predominantly Protestant, and which was created by Christian Radicals, mostly Protestant, fleeing the Church-State tyrannies that dominated and enslaved Europe for so long. It was overthrown by a court that does not have one Protestant or Atheist sitting on its bench, in a country which is overwhelmingly Protestant, though they are fractured into hundreds of different sects. And this is called representative justice.

But even the three Jews and one Catholic who did try to defend those Protestants who agree with Jefferson that a Church-State connection is one of the first steps toward tyranny, — even they put up a feeble resistance, and did not touch on the real violations in this case which are Involuntary Servitude, and Theft of taxpayer’s monies.

Moreover, the Justices did not address the great divisiveness and factionalism which this heinous ruling will bring about, the hatred and aggression between members of local communities who never before really thought or cared that much about their neighbor’s views on organized religions.

During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Catholics burned Protestants alive for their religious views and writings. Protestants burned Catholics alive for their religious views and writings. Protestants burned other Protestants alive for their religious views and writings. Catholics burned other Catholics alive for their religious views and writings.

And then came the Libertarian American Revolution, led by Thomas Jefferson and Thom Paine. “Build up a Wall of Separation between Church and State”, wrote Wisechief Jefferson.

And tragically, yesterday, the emasculated Supreme Court overthrew that Wall of Separation that has made America a country where people of all religions, agnostics, and atheists, can trade and fulfill their commodity needs in a generally orderly fashion, without religous differences having any significant impact on their market behaviour.

And this heinous overthrow was backed by that disgrace in the White House who was put there with the backing of leading Liberal Democrats, like Alan Dershowitz and John Rothmann, and supposed Liberal defenders of Civil Rights like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ADL. They helped put this religous fanatic in the White House, and it will be everyone in America who is a true Jeffersonian Libertarian and truly religious, and who doesn’t want to have the Deity’s name in any way connected with such an immoral government, who will suffer.

Jefferson taught us that government is a necessary evil, but an evil nevertheless. Why then would you want to contaminate “That which is Sacred” by any contact with such an immoral government as the American Government has become? And it has become that way because it moved away from the Libertarian Principles which motivated Thomas Jefferson, and the Radicals of the American Revolution. Those principles lead to both Civil Liberties, and Free-Market Capitalism. The two are intimately entwined.

But the legal reason why any official prayer before a townhall meeting, or any public-government event, should be illegal is that it is both a form of involuntary servitude, and a form of theft.

Prayer before a government event, like a city council meeting, violates the Constitutional prohibition against Involuntary Servitude, by forcing an attendee at a townhall meeting to either wait through the prayer, or remove themselves from the hall. But the reason they came to the meeting was to conduct secular, government business. In that their time and energy has been wasted in the course of their carrying out their civic duties or necessities, they have been forced into involutary servitude. You should not have your time wasted, or be forced to leave a public hall, because of someone else’s religious practices. And this is the one of the real reasons why this ruling by the Supreme Court is wrong, immoral, and unConstitutional.

The other reason is the theft of those taxpayer’s monies who agree with Jefferson on separation of church and state. While the prayers are being said in the townhall, the lights are running, the air conditioner may be going, the electricity is being used — and all, not in the service of legitimate government functions, but to further the religious propaganda of one of our major organized religions. These lights and power all cost money, and the fact that that tax money is being mulcted out of the Jeffersonian Citizens to pay for this violation of Separation of Church and State is actually Theft of Money, which in Libertarian Doctrine is a very serious, heinous crime.

In short, these prayer-pushers at public meetings are Slave Owners and Thieves, breeding factionalism and division among the American Public.

And the five disgraceful “Justices”, who voted for this vile overthrow of the Separation of Church and State, need to be impeached.

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

 

Arizona’s SB 1062: Here Come the Racists

February 25, 2014

Arizona’s SB 1062 is an unlawful, and probably unConstitutional, Racist attempt to overthrow the laws of the United States, which forbid discriminating in business based on race, color, creed, etc. and now so-called sexual orientation.

Now, Silverwolf discussed in detail in his blog, “Is It Constitutional in America to Discriminate in a Business?: An Internal Debate”, https://lobobreed.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/is-it-legal-in-america-to-discriminate-in-a-business-an-internal-debate/, whether it was Consitutional and/or legal to discriminate in business, and he went through an entire series of arguments and counter=arguments with himself, finally arriving at the conclusion that it was indeed illegal. Why?

It is illegal simply because businesses advertise their products priced in U.S. dollars, that is, Federal Reserve Notes. Now, it says on those notes that they are legal tender for all debts, public and private, and thus, if someone operates a business, and offers a good or service priced in U.S. dollars, then they must accept your legal tender note, since the government has promised you already that such a note is legal tender for any private debt, which is the price of the goods or service. Thus, the seller would be forced to accept these notes if he has offered goods or services to the public, either by being open for business, placing his prices in his windows or attached to the items in the store, or advertising them in the media. They are publicly offered debts, and in a real sense, that person has offered a contract to all comers that he will trade his good or service for their Federal Reserve Notes. To refuse to serve them would be to Violate a Contract, which is a Crime in both theoretical Libertarian doctrine and actual U.S. Law. This would be true even if the note was an old Silver or Gold Certificate note, backed by precious metal. (However, if the person paid in Silver or Gold Coinage, then they might well be able to discriminate, but that is another legal discussion, and here we are dealing solely with Federal Reserve Notes. But we’re certain, given the “dedication” and religous purity of these people who don’t want to do business with Gays, that if they were running a Restaurant that served $300 dinners, and a Gay wanted to purchase a dinner and pay his bill in $20 Gold pieces or Silver Dollars, that they would steadfastly refuse them service — that’s how religiously dedicated and pure they are.And we’re sure that if they suddenly needed emergency medical assistance and were rushed to a doctor, and the doctor was a Muslim, and refused on religious grounds to treat, or even touch, the sinful flesh of any non-Muslim, that they would understand, and respect his Religious Liberties, and die quickly.)

Now the so-called Conservative Group that is advocating this anti-Capitalist Law, the Center for Arizona Policy, states “SB 1062 seeks to ensure that state laws that violate the religious liberties of private persons cannot be enforced simply because the government is not technically a party to the case.”

But that “the government is not technically a party to the case” is precisely a big whopping Lie, as we have illustrated above. The Federal goverment is a party to the case, because it says on the Federal Reserve Note that the Federal government says this is a legal tender note that can be used to service any private debt anywhere in America, regardless of in what State, and the seller of the goods or service is refusing to accept what the Federal government has ordered him to accept if he is going to price his goods and services in U.S. Dollars. So the government is right in the midst of the trade, and is thus very clearly a party to the case. The contract they promised to the bearer was violated by the seller, and thus the seller must be punished under Law.

Now, if the seller could price his goods or services in, say, Swiss Francs or conch shells or ounces of tea, then perhaps the seller might be able to legally discriminate in his business, but this again is a different political theory question, and alternate currencies are viewed with askance by the U.S. Treasury and the government, although in a Libertarian Free-Market Society we should be able to price or purchase items in whatever currencies we, the buyer and seller, can agree on. If we think the Zimbabwean Shilling is sounder than the U.S. Dollar, then we should, in a Libertarian Society, be able to conduct our Free Market in whatever currency we choose. That would be a truly Free Market, and will come in the Future. But, here and now in America, if you price something in U.S. Dollars, and publicly advertise it, the buyer should be able to settle the debt in U.S. Dollars, whomever they are, and the government must guarantee that reality.

And finally, if your religous liberties make it impossible for you to conduct your business in America in Federal Reserve Notes, as under current law, then you’re always free to not start a business that will violate those liberties, and your always free to seek your living in some other manner, or starve to death. (Oh, we forgot, there are food stamps even for Racists, paid for by some poor Black working stiff.)

This Bill is nothing but a Communist-Racist attempt to instill that Ol’ Southern Segregation in the midst of Arizona.The Governor of Arizona should lob a big lunger of Libertarian Free Market Spit on this unAmerican Bill, and veto it.

If the Governor signs the Bill, all Free Market non-Racist Americans should use that grand old Irish Free-Market weapon: the Boycott, and Boycott Arizona. Don’t go there, and don’t buy their products.

If the Governor signs the Bill, then, as they used to say in the ghetto, “Boycott, Baby, Boycott!”

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

A Forgotten British Libertarian: William Bailward on Welfare

November 25, 2013

The more things change, the more they stay the same.That certainly is a dictum to keep in mind as we see the beginnings of the unraveling of the welfare State under our current government

But the horrendous mess the Democrats and Republicans have created in America is no surprise, given the history of welfare in the English-speaking world since Queen Elizabeth I.

In reading William Bailward’s book of essays on what Americans would call welfare, one was struck by how similar the situations and the mentality of Bailward’s day were, circa 1905-1912, with those of present day America.

Bailward’s “The Slippery Slope and Other Papers on Social Subjects” gives a clear picture of the problems that confronted British welfare from 1601 until Bailward’s day, and those problems are indistinguishable from those we now find in America, with 47 million on food stamps, the dollar buying a quarter of what it did in 2000, and 51% of the population receiving a check from the government every month — the exact percentage by which Obama was re-elected. Bailward had obviously not only thought about government welfare a great deal, but he also served as Chairman of a Board of Guardians, which was the body of people who would hear welfare cases directly from the applicants, and then make a dispensation. Bailward must have heard thousands of applicants in his career, which also included election to the British Parliament, and serving on a Board in one of the poorer sections of London. He knew welfare, both in theory and practice, and the insights in his essays should be carefully pondered by both Libertarians and members of the Bipartisan Party who want to raise the standard of living in America.

Bailward traces the history of British welfare back to the days of Elizabeth I, who, in 1601, instituted the Poor Law, which basically said that everyone who was “impotent” (i.e. unable to work or support themselves) should receive aid, while those who were able-bodied should be found work. Sounds a lot like modern America, don’t it.

The results of this were disastrous. For centuries England struggled with terrible poverty amongst its masses, and for many decades virtually everyone in the countryside was on a parish dole. The care of the “impotent” came to be the main function of the Poor Law, and the bit about finding work for the able-bodied was generally ignored. “Pauperism”, a concept Bailward talks much of, was rampant, and a multitude of British thinkers and artists, from John Locke to Lord Byron, wrote out their own schemes for raising the appalling standard of living

This sorry state continued until 1834, when the poor law was revised, and the equal eligibility of the impotent and the able-bodied was changed to make the working man eligible first for aid. This led to a large drop in the number of paupers.

There are several concepts that Bailward discusses which most American Libertarians probably overlook when considering welfare.

Firstly, there was the divergence between “indoor” and “outdoor” relief. Indoor meant the workhouse or poorhouse, where the recipients had to live in the institution to receive aid. Once “outdoor” aid got popular — aid which one could go and pick up and then go home — the number of paupers greatly increased.

Secondly, Bailward makes the very important distinction between “poverty” and “pauperism”. Poor people, or people living in poverty, who worked, lived frugally, and though poor managed to support themselves, are distinguished from “paupers”, who lacked any ambition to get off the dole, often drifted around, spending the days chatting or lounging on the parish lawns, and generally made a career out of cadging money, food, or clothing from various charities or government bodies. “Pauperism” sounds a lot like many of America’s homeless, although their ranks have been greatly swelled since the Bank Bailout Bill under Bush which Obama and most Democrats and Republicans voted for, and which has inflated the cost of necessities three or four times for Americans (and foreigners). Many of the homeless under Obama do not have pauperistic attitudes, but were overwhelmed by his and the Fed’s Inflation.

Bailward is a great believer in private charities giving aid, instead of Boards of Guardians dispensing goverment tax monies. And as in America, the tax rates did nothing but continuously go up in his day.

As Bailward was writing these essays, England was in the process of shifting away from the Poor Law and its 1834 Revision, into a system where each type of welfare had its own branch. For example, they began an old age pension scheme which gave everyone over 70 a pension. Then they had a school feeding program. And then various other programs were introducted. Bailward laments that the various bureaucracies that handled each new type of welfare had no coordination with each other, so that many people were receiving multiple benefits under multiple programs, and there was no central statistical bureaucracy that could keep track of it all. With the coming of the computer, that problem should theoretically be gone.

All in all, William Bailward’s “The Slippery Slope” is a work which all Libertarians should peruse, especially those interested in welfarism. Its discussions will broaden your understanding.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Mussolini’s Triumph: Obamacare, America Goes Fascist

October 17, 2013

Benito Mussolini must be smiling in the ash pile, 68 years after his death,  as the United States of America goes Fascist, forcing its citizens to buy insurance from private corporations.

Mussolini summed up Fascism in these words, “Il Fascismo e il Corporatismo”, Fascism is Corporatism, and today, October 17, 2013, with the failure of the Senate to stop the implimentation of Obamacare, Fascism has been firmly established in America.

No longer will a citizen be allowed to just exist on his own, violating nobody’s property rights, and not demanding that anybody else’s property rights should be violated for his benefit. The Constitution acknowledged the Human Being’s “inalienable” Right to his Life and Liberty, and to be left alone in privacy, but now Obama and his Democrats have finally overthrown those Rights, and turned all Americans into the slaves of the corporations — either that or live in poverty and let someone else slog all day to pay for your insurance, a kind of forced corruption of the Individual by the Government — or else pay the fine/tax, which of course forces you to dedicate your life and liberty to getting the money to pay the fine, a form of involuntary servitude. Clearly this is not only grossly Immoral, but also Unconstitutional, and no matter what the supreme court says, 5 to 4, it is clear to any logically thinking American that it is Unconstitutional.

It has taken 237 years for the overthrow of the Jeffersonian Constitution by the Corporate Fascists. Jefferson said that government, though a necessary evil, was essentially an evil because of the massive power it placed in the hands of individuals in the government, and that only the chains of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights could hold it down.

It took the Totalitarians 237 years to overthrow the Constitution of Indiviidual Liberty. Today they are laughing, and Jefferson is crying.

And on the ash pile, Mussolini is smiling.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Fresh Thoughts on Libertarianism

October 5, 2013

Certain ideas about Libertarianism have coalesced in Silverwolf’s mind, and the cats have threatened to go on strike if he doesn’t disclose them to the Public. (Labor Union Coercion!)

First off, Libertarianism is a vast, vast field or ocean, that is just being entered upon. It’s a long way to the other side, before one is debouched into Paradise. So this means that all thinking about the political Philosophy of Libertarianism is in the stage of infancy. It is as if “Democracy” had just come on the scene and was five years old, and every Greek was throwing in his two drachmas as to what it meant and how to define it.

So “Libertarianism” is just beginning, and since it is such a powerful philosophy — this Philosophy of Classical Liberalism — it will have many courtiers claiming that their brand is “His” brand above.

In Silverwolf’s brand of Libertarianism, four ingredients are necessary.

First, Individual Libertarianism must always be put above Corporate so-called Libertarianism, although Libertarianism should not entertain any unnecessary hostility towards Corporations, as long as they obey the Libertarian Non-Aggression Axiom. A share in a Corporation which has value on the open market should be treated just as any other form of private property, although while an individual income tax would be anathema to the Rights delineated in Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence, a Corporate Income Tax would not necessarily also be, because it taxes a Collective notional Institution, not an Individual.

So first, the Individual’s Rights must always be placed above the so-called rights of a coroporation.

Second, Libertarianism must fight to shore up and defend Jefferson’s “Wall of Separation” between Church and State. Church-State linkages throughout history have been disastrous both for the people and for Free-Market Capitalism, with the exception of the military hardware suppliers. We only have to look today at “religious” regimes throughout the world to see the most despicable forms of tyranny and torture being perpetrated, and to realize that little has changed since the Spanish Inquisition if Organized Religion once gets its bloody paws on the reins of government. Just as Free-Market Capitalist Libertarians call for separation of Business and State, so must they call for and maintain separation of Church and State, and a very strict separation at that.

Finally, while Libertarians believe that unconstitutional governmental laws should be overthrown in a day — laws like the individual income tax, or being forced into a government-run pension or medical-care scheme, or a “national service” involuntary servitude requirement, or the jailing of Americans by the hundreds of thousands for cannabis possession, or forcing Hindus, at the tax collector’s gunpoint, to fork over the fruits of their labor to pay for USDA beef inspections — we know that, given the public’s socialistic, big-government, brainwashing, it will not be so.

Thus, although you’d like to overthrow tyrranical laws in a day, Libertarian’s should probably settle for a gradualist framework for their change, because the American public is essentially conservative, and a conservative is someone who likes moderation. Southern Slavery, one of the Great Human Rights Crimes of recorded history, should have been overthrown in a day, but it took decades to burn its rotten carcass. Thus Libertarians should probably offer five to ten-year phaseouts of government programs like Social Security and Unemployment Insurance or Obamacare, not because we don’t think their injustices should be eliminated immediately, but because such a call would not be accepted by the majority of voters, but a gradual phaseout would be. We also think that maintaining these programs for those Socialists who think they are the greatest thing since Marx would be OK, as long as all the costs and all the liabilities fell completely on the shoulders of the program’s participants.

For example, if the State of California ended its mandatory, forced participation of all workers in the Unemployment Insurance Program, but then maintained a program called “California Unemployment Security Program” in which all costs and liabilities were thrown onto the program’s participants, and not the general taxpayer or anyone working in California, then we wouldn’t really object, although such programs should certainly not be within the pale of government functions in the mind of a true Jeffersonian Libertarian.

However, it is obvious that such a “State” program would be “State” only in name, and that such a program would not differ at all from a private, free-market insurance fund. The Socialists and Patriots could feel they were contributing to “their” government, since they both are fond of saying that “the government is us”, and they could walk away with that glow lonely Socialists feel when they kid themselves that “we’re a village”. Yet, they never seem to pool their bank accounts.

Lastly, Libertarianism must be fiercely anti-racist in its outlook, because the racist looks at others with an image in his mind, a pre-judgement. Just as the Marxist defines Individuals by their class, and always attempts character assassination by class association instead of argument, so too will the racist define individuals according to whatever images his exposure to propaganda has inclined him. A racist can obviously utter words that reflect Truth and point out an injustice, while a non-racist or anti-racist can utter false propaganda (and all propaganda is a lie!) and keep mum about heinous injustices which they perpetrate (the Democrats, for example, jailing people for cannabis possession and keeping it illegal, or deforesting the National Forests to benefit major corporations while spreading toxic pesticides far and wide).

So a racist, like a Marxist, pre-judges people based on the most infantile and neanderthalic thinking, whereas a Libertarian sees all men as possessors of sacred Natural Rights, which make them the highest creation of Nature. A True Libertarian would have a positive, non-aggressive attitude towards all, except those who want to violently aggress against the property rights (which include the bodies) of their fellow citizens, or those who want to incite hatred or violence against whole economic classes, religious groups, races, or nationalities. Such Individuals are anti-Libertarian and anti-Capitalist, though they may mascarade as Libertarians, or friends of Natural Rights.

The essence of Capitalism is Liberty, the Freedom of two Individual Human Beings to engage in a trade of commodities voluntarily, in which both parties are happy with the results. Primitive tribesman did this in the jungle, but the modern day Socialists say that such actions are wicked.

So Libertarianism, at least Silverwolf’s brand, must include placing the Individual above the Collectivist Corporation, a fierce separation of Mosque and State, an anti-racist and anti-xenophobic ferocity, and a defense and championing of Liberty, as the essential ingredient of Free-Market Capitalism.

What’s your brand of Libertarianism?

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

They’re Libertarians and They Don’t Know It: The Freedom from Pesticides Bill of Rights

October 1, 2013

In a remote rural county of Oregon, a radical proposition is being placed before the voters that Silverwolf thinks is very significant for radical Individualist Libertarianism, not only because it attacks the Corporate Poisoners, who, in collusion with the Democrats, are slowly poisoning not only the beautiful lands in Oregon, but the local residents as well, but also because the Initiative would place the Rights of Individuals above the fictitious “Rights” of Corporations. These Corporate mass poisonings of the Public, through aerial spraying of dangerous pesticides adjacent to residential properties and lands, in order to swell the corporate coffers of the pesticide Industry, are the fruits of what anti-Fascist Historian  Dave Emory has called the Borman Underground Reich Capital Network, which is basically the wealth looted by the Nazis during WWII translated into corporate power throughout the world. The poisoning of Oregonians with Bayer pesticides is not very different, morally speaking, from the mass poisoning of Jews by Bayer during World War II, except in scale, only now the Democrats are defending the Nazis, instead of attacking them (though, of course, Roosevelt wouldn’t bomb the rail lines leading to the concentration camps, or even the camps themselves). The disgusting Democratic Governor of Oregon, John Kitzhaber, fully backs these attacks on the health of Oregon’s citizens and children, and the attacks on the value of their properties when pesticide residues drift onto their land. And this Shower calls himself not only a Governor but also an M.D.

The group opposing the Fascists and their Democrat Collaborators is the Freedom From Pesticides Alliance at freedomfrompesticidesalliance.org, which is based in Josephine County, Oregon. The actual initiative they are placing on the ballot can be read at their website.

Residential Property Owners must betake themselves to the defense of the environmental integrity of their demesnes, or this will become a rotten realm, fit for no man to live in henceforth. The Democrats and Republicans are destroying the Earth, as are the leaders of virtually every other country, from Valerie Puta, the Russian Whore, in her Siberia, to the Indonesian Tree Butchers of Borneo, to the Nazis with Suntans down under, murdering their kangaroos and deforesting the continent while they push boatloads of women and children back to sea, to the Japanese, Singaporean, and Malaysian investors, who make their money by destroying the rainforests of Asia.

And added to the massive spraying of toxic pesticides adjacent to the properties of Individual Free-Market Capitalists, is a proposed increase in logging and spraying by the Democrat, Congressman Peter DeFazio, which comes in the face of what the other day the UN called a 95% certain chance that global warming is taking place due to Human activity. Trees are Carbon Banks. The Democrats, including Obama and DeFazio, tell us that we have global warming and urgently need a carbon tax, but at the same time DeFazio introduces a Bill that increases logging on so-called “public lands” though they are administered by the BLM as a lucrative boondoggle for themselves and their Fascist, timber-corporation bedfellows. BLM collaboration pays the lucrative salaries, benefit packages, and pensions of the BLM bureaucrats.

So even though living trees are known to be wonderful carbon banks, DeFazio tells us we must cut more trees, as at the same time he tells us we should pay a carbon tax for the sake of the Planet and the coming generations. At the same time, he permits the use of atrazine in America, around children, when it has been banned in the EU since 2003, a ban he critically called for in the 1980s, but now is mum on. What a hypocritical Shower is Liberal Democrat Congressman Peter DeFazio!

(For an exhaustive examination of the pesticides which the Democratic Corporate Fascists are permitting to be sprayed on Americans, you can refer to preciousdirt.org, which is an excellent site for such information.)

It is only Libertarians, who want to defend their Inalienable Natural Right to the Quiet Enjoyment of their Property, and Environmentalists, who rarely seem to understand Free-Market economics, and who seem to have an animus against Capitalism, despite all the benefits it has brought to man’s basic standard of living, but who also share the Libertarians desire to have their properties free from invasion by toxic poisons — it is only these two groups who seem motivated enough to challenge the gradual Corporate Nazification of America, conducted by the mainstream Democrats and Republicans.

Silverwolf has written in the past of how these two philosophies, Libertarianism and Environmentalism, must come together and merge if we are ever to have a free world of free people in an unpolluted environ. A radical, Individual Jeffersonian Libertarianism, as seen in the original Bill of Rights and Constitution, is ultimately based on the defense of Individual Property Rights (and Professor Rothbard has clearly explained how all Rights, including Civil Rights, are ultimately forms of Property Rights, including the Right to own your own body),  Environmentalism, a loving of the Earth and Nature, and a wanting to preserve them as pristinely as possible, is also a type of Property Rights Defense Movement, although here the aim is the survival and health of the Human Race and all Life on Earth. 

Through the legal weapon of the Freedom from Pesticide Bill of Rights, the voters of Josephine County will have a chance to prohibit the use of pesticides by corporate or government entities on all lands within the county except private residential lands. Though they have been accused of being on the side of corporations by the Left, Libertarians like  Professor Murray Rothbard have  repeatedly said that no one has the right to pollute the air you breathe or the water you drink. And, of course, one of the main Libertarian concepts, along the with Non-aggression Axiom, is the idea of freedom from invasion, whether of ones body by pesticide poisoning, rape, assault, or the Draft, or of ones property, like ones land.

As to the Crimes of Child Poisoning and Well Poisoning, — the Governmental Authority at the Federal and State levels has the responsibility and the authority to stop aggressions against Individuals like child poisonings, but that authority this day has become an abuse against Individual Property Rights to the very pitch of wickedness. The Crimes of Well Poisoning and Child Poisoning are so heinous that they may well warrant Capital Punishment, though that might sound extreme. and we have always strongly opposed the Death Penalty on Principle. But we’d settle for Life on Gruel at dull labor, which is what many Law-abiding Americans end up with, or even having the bottom fall out of their corporate stock portfolios, which in America is an even more feared form of Capital Punishment. (“Go ahead and execute me, but Please don’t ruin my stock portfolio!” cried the Corporate CEO at his trial.) Certainly such Crimes deserve at least 20 years in jail.

Governor Kitzhaber and Congressman DeFazio are Corporate Fascists who need to be impeached. These Showers are typical of the bulk of Democratic Politicians, just as deadly to children as the Corporate Republicans. It is a long way to the day when Silverwolf’s dream of having all buildings subterranean is realized, with the surface of the earth looking like one huge contiguous park or forest (and any necessary buildings above ground designed in the Gothic style of Oxford and Cambridge), but the first step to even having an Earth populated by Humans, Animals and Trees may be contained within this Bill.

It seems to us that in using the “Rights” argument to fight the Corporate Nazis, the Environmentalists, at least in this case, are finally on the “Rights” track, though we think the idea of “Community Rights” is an incorrect one which the Corporations can easily slap down. This is because a “Community” is a Collectivist Entity, just like a Corporation. Both are Notional Concepts, mere intellectual phantoms, and not a real Individual Human Being like you, with Inalienable Rights protected by Jefferson’s beautiful Bill of Rights. If a “Community”, which is a Collective, can have Rights, it will be argued, then why not a Corporation, which is also a Collective in our view, although without the coercion of being forced to stay in that Collective (i.e. a worker can walk off the job and quit; an investor can sell his stock).

Moreover, the “community rights” issue is actually a false attempt to enlarge the Jeffersonian concept of Natural Rights. Natural Rights were only inherent in Individual Human Beings, we’d guess in Jefferson’s mind, because at the time environmental pollution and deforestation in America probably never entered into men’s consciousness.  Back then, someone might decry the cutting of a particular grove or area that they loved, but the environmental degradation the upcoming generations are currently facing has gone way beyond that.

However, in establishing a “community rights” concept in Law, the Environmentalists are establishing, or rather re-inforcing, a dangerous anti-Jeffersonian concept — the concept of collective Rights. This phoney and false concept is the very reason Corporations have been able to establish and maintain such a massive violation of the Bill of Rights against Individual Citizens, as well as enabling whole groups to shift their tax burthen to other, less powerful groups and Individuals, both vile forms of cozenage. For example, married people and people with children getting huge tax deductions in the form of exemption credits which single people don’t qualify for (although if we continue to have the immoral income tax, then people with children under 17 should continue to get a tax deduction for up to two children). This massive injustice has gone on for decades, and is soon to be expanded with the legalization of Gay marriage. Such inequalities are corrupt and immoral, but you’ll never hear the Democratic politicians using their bully pulpit to denounce them, and call for their immediate abolition. On the contrary, they applaud it.

So, the establishment of “community rights” is a dangerous, collectivist phantom, that does not exist. However, since most of America passively accepts these collectivist injustices, such as corporate tax breaks and privileges, and marriage tax breaks, then going for “community rights” fits in nicely with the deception. If it helps halt attacks on Individual Free-Marketeer’s bodies and lands, then it is worth trying.

Another problem with the concept of “community rights” is: who defines the “community”? Is it a specific geographic area, and who gets the power to decide where the boundaries are? Now, in this case of Josephine County, the boundaries of the “community” are the borders of the county, so the concept is limited, at least to that extent  in this case. But  what about the members of the community who want the spraying and clearcut logging to continue? What about the people who hate trees, want to kill off Nature, and are so misanthropic that they want to see an end to the Human Being.  Aren’t the Necrophiles entitled to community rights also, since they are part of the community, and it could not be defined as a community without them?

Obviously, the idea of “community” can be extended outwardly indefinitely unto the utmost inhabited regions of the Earth. In actuality, the only “community” on the planet is Human Beings; it includes everybody. But we obviously don’t have control of what happens in “communities” in Siberia or North Korea. And in the short run, we think it imperative for Jeffersonian Classical Liberalism, that America continue to exist as a separate country, since it has the most Libertarian Constitution in the world, and by merging America into a “world community” at the present time, that Constitution would be quickly overthrown by the 80% of the world that is still Totalitarian.

No, the Environmentalists need to stick to one simple point: defending Individual Rights, (and ultimately those are all Individual Property Rights). That’s all Jefferson bit off, and it’s plenty. Don’t complicate it by saying that “ecosystems” or “natural communities” have Rights, because most of the American public, and certainly the legal scholars, won’t buy that. Animals don’t even have rights in America; they can be butchered and eaten by their owners, or butchered and have their corpses sold, to be pleached and plaited with human spittle; they can be slowly tortured to death in useless experiments at universities. What a vile end to a joyous life that began as a chick or a calf or a goat kid or a lamb or a baby salmon!

So if animals don’t have rights in America, and trees don’t have rights, you’re not going to convince a judge or the voting public that “ecosystems or natural communities” have rights, although “natural communities” does include in its concept both the ecosystem and the people living in it, so it might have rights because it involves Individual Humans by definition. But it still fails on the grounds of instilling rights in things other than Humans, which we don’t think will wash with the courts or the public.

However, this is picking tiny flaws in what is otherwise a seemingly well-wrought piece of legislation. One very important point this Bill does address, and it is a point Silverwolf has put forth many times in his posts, is that Individuals must be put above Corporations in the eyes of the Law. Our Jeffersonian Constitution speaks only of Individual Rights; it says nothing about Corporate Rights, and so, in our Laws, Libertarians must fight solely for Individual Rights, for the idea of “Corporate Rights” is an oxymoron and a lie. Collectives don’t have Rights; Individuals do.

So kudos on the Environmental Revolutionaries who crafted this wonderful, though slightly flawed bill. This Libertarian howl of Freedom is for you, and for the necessary coming day when we shall see the marriage of Jeffersonian Classical Liberalism or Libertarianism with the Environmentalists, who are Libertarian Defenders of the Earth and Private Property Rights, but don’t know it yet.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

West Coast Democrats Crucify Black Youth: The Minimum Wage Law Nail

September 24, 2013

It looks like Democratic Governors Jerry Brown and John Kitzhaber have been taking turns smashing that final bolt into the right hand of Black Youth as they nail them down from any opportunity to earn some money, and crucify them with inaction at a time in their lives when they desperately need money, and the experience of handling it.

California’s raise of its minimum wage to $10/hr, and Oregon’s to $9.15/hr will crucify the Black Youth of both states, for, at such absurdly high wage levels, it is highly unlikely that many of them will be able to make enough profit for their employers that it becomes profitable to hire them. As usual, the well-fed, well-paid Democratic and Republican legislators who passed these heinous Bills will not mention the horrendous effects it will have on hundreds of thousands of lives in these two States. The Black Youth who will remain unemployed, though a job just came up that could have employed him at the old minimum wage rate but which can’t afford to employ him at the new one, and the White teenager who will also remain unemployed, or be laid off because his employer is now losing money on his labor, not making it, — both of these are the primary victims of the Democrat’s vile and successful attempt to disemploy them, so as to eliminate competition in the labor market and thus artificially boost the wages of union workers, who can live high on the misery of young Blacks.

What gives these millionaire and near-millionaire White Men the Right to ruin the lives of these young Black Men with their Fascistic minimum wage law, one of the key demands of the Communist manifesto? What gives these arrogant mountebank politicians the Right to keep a young Black Man unemployed for years in his youth, never gaining the skills he might have gained on a job if he had freely negotiated his wage with his employer on the Free-Market, as Free Men do, but who must submit himself to the Fascist whims of Rich White Men in the California and Oregon Legislatures, just as the Southern Slaves had to submit themselves to the whims of their Miscreant White Owners, Criminals all. And Rich White Men Politicians can include Blacks and Latinos, to their shame, as they vote to hold down those that share their cultural background and knowledge.

But the minimum wage law does not just crucify Black Youth disproportionally, it also cruelly victimizes two other groups in society: the small business man and the consumer on a fixed income, such as a government pension.

The small business man, better known as a Capitalist, is now forced to either make less profit, which will mean the end of his business if he was just scraping by before the minimum wage rise, or to put up the price of his goods to cover the wage cost increase, since it is generally estimated that labor costs constitute roughly 70% of the final cost of a product. This, in turn, causes more inflation in society, and inflation is what brings about social chaos and Fascism. The Democrats, so ignorant of economics, are bringing about the rise of the Nazis with their minimum wage increases.

The final group to be crucified by the Democrat’s minimum wage hike are the millions in these two States on fixed incomes, who can barely keep up with the tripleing and quadrupleing of the cost of their basic necessities that the Democrat’s inflation (with much help from the FED and Quisling-Republicans) has engineered in the last seven years. Now that the minimum wage has tragically hit $10, fresh accelerations in inflation will be forthcoming, and many elderly will die as they cut back on food and heat. But don’t expect the Democratic legislators and Governors to be charged with their murder, or to attend their funerals. Just like the lives of the Young Black Men which have been ruined by this law, just like the lives of the White teenagers that have been derailed by this law, just like the lives of the many Free-Market Capitalist small Businessmen who will have to shut their doors, or never open them in the first place, and just like the lives of the elderly Democratic pensioner, whose lifetime pension has just been significantly reduced in its purchasing power by inflation, — just like all these groups, the deaths of the elderly from self-neglect will not be reported in the press.  And just like these four groups that suffer such damage from this malevolent law, so too will this Fascistic, inflationary, Government intrusion into the Free Market for Labor hurt you, as you pay through the nose for every little service. These Miscreants have destroyed the value of the Dollar, and vomited on the ideas of Saving and Frugality.

California and Oregon Democrats —- you wanted inflation and unemployment and you’re going to get it. Enjoy your poverty, Fascists!

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

America’s Young Adults: Buried Alive in Boredom

September 21, 2013

Silverwolf feels a great sympathy for America’s youths and young adults, who are buried alive in boredom in a Socialist society that gives them very little Liberty, and offers them very little except years of drudgery. It is no wonder that youths turn to all kinds of absurd escapes from this condition, not realizing how they are being exploited by the elders, or even angry about it. They seem lost in the same world of cigarettes, beer, and idle chasing after “pleasure” that people were lost in in the 1920s or 1950s or the 1980s. Only now we have the added problems of mass obesity and a tattoo culture that views the body as an object, instead of a process of energy manifesting itself as Liberty.  American Youth reacts with conditioned responses to the problems created by the environment, the environment being other people and the government. Most of us have been dragooned into government schools at an early age, and the brainwashing starts with the robot-like Pledge of Allegiance, with its blasphemous overthrow of Separation of Church and State, — a Vile insult to Jefferson, Atheists, Agnostics, and Libertarian Believers who want to keep religion out of government, which means innoculating government against religious tyranny, something they could well do with in Iraq, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Gaza, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Burma.

In the five years Obama has been President, what has he done to educate America’s youth as far as diet goes? Why are 70-80% of the young adult women and men obese or grossly overweight? If Government Schools are so great, why have they not educated the youth in nutrition? Why do they dare serve junk food to youth, and then force you to pay for the medical bills those junk food diets will ultimately bring? Virtually all school districts in America receive some kind of federal aid. Why is not banning junk food from school cafeterias and vending machines a federal requirement to receive Federal Aid?

The reason, simply put, is because Obama is a corporate stooge, and he will not do anything that will hurt corporate profits, which will in turn hurt the stock market, which will in turn hurt his popularity with the middle class,  and since it is major corporations that manufacture the bulk of junk food, and since there are vast sums at stake in supply schools with junk food, instead of only natural foods with no additives or salt, nothing will change under Obama. This change could have been accomplished in a few days, but Obama is such a revolutionary, that he has not been able in five years to mumble the words, or issue another of his executive orders, banning junk foods at all government schools in America. Now that is real change, Democrat-style.

America has nothing to offer its youth, except blood, sweat, tears, tatoos, unemployment, drugs, and pornography,  thanks to the Damnable Minimum Wage Law, that Communist piece of obscenity and War on the Young, and the lousy Democrat and Republican politicians who support it.

Rise up, American Youth, vote out the Politicians who hold you down and violate your Human Right to Work and Contract, and vote in the Libertarians, who will liberate you from the economic tyranny of the Bipartisans and their Government Schools.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

The Libertarian Cure for a Vile,Violent World

August 24, 2013

Look what a mess the Politicians are making around the world, and no one is stopping it. Assad chemically gasses a thousand people — one supposes that the previous tens of thousands of murders by Assad weren’t enough for the castrated heads of the “international community” and the UN to carpet-bomb him. A few days before, hundreds of people are gunned down in Cairo, the same people who claimed to be non-violent while they torched 61 churches and murdered Coptic Christians in a Muslim Brotherhood Kristallnacht against the Christians in Egypt. A few days later, 36 prisoners are gassed to death in a van, while their comrades in philosophy shoot 24 soldiers in the back of the head in the Sinai.

The BBC reports on sadistic gulag prison conditions that occur routinely in Kazakhstan, while new reports coming out on North Korea refer to the horrendous prison conditions in the many gulags there. But Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama and David Cameron and Francois Hollande and Angela Merkel and Kevin Rudd do nothing about it, even though the North Korean Kim Gang and the top military leadership could have been and should have been carpet-bombed into oblivion years ago. Evidently Human Rights — the Natural Law Rights of the Libertarians or Classical Liberals — means very little to these Politicians. To them, it means collaborating with whole gangs of murderers and torturers who would get the death penalty in many states in America, and life in prison in Europe if they could be brought to justice. But because they call themselves Heads of State, the Western Politicians collaborate with them, and  thus themselves are guilty of complicity in murder, obviously.

And Hilary Clinton finally got her pro-Arab propaganda on American TV in the form of Al-Jazeera, the mouthpiece of the Muslim Brotherhood, and their violently anti-Semitic, anti-Christian hatred. Mrs. Clinton, you will recall, whitewashed the station on March 2nd, 2011, by extolling the quality of its “real news”. “Well, if our Beloved Hilary loves it, it must be OK”, clicks the robot-like brain of most Democrats, and anyone who attacks it will be considered a “reactionary Republican” or an alarmist. And ain’t it interesting that Al Gore, that supposed supporter of Israel, sold his broadcast license to an anti-Israeli, anti-Semitic. Monarchy-owned station. Careful Democrats, your Jimmy Carter scabs are starting to show through your well-taylored clothes. Now the American public will be subjected day and night to the pro-Arab, Jew-hating propaganda of the Emir of Qatar and his emirate, another bastion of the violation of Natural Human Rights. Just what the world needs, the return of the legitimacy of Monarchy, one of the most bestial forms of government ever thought up. Silverwolf will be sure he never ever watches Al-“Nazi”ra.

Meanwhile, over in South Africa, it’s been a year since 34 Black miners were gunned down by the Government’s police, but nobody has been prosecuted or brought to justice. This is an example of the corruption and injustice that Socialist Regimes always bring to their people, although when they were out of power they themselves cried for justice. The crimes of the Botha Regime are now being carried out with impunity by the ANC. See, Blacks and Whites are equal — equally depraved.

But turning to the “civilized” West, we find that in Australia, a country the size of America with less population than California, they don’t seem to have enough room for a few tens of thousands of refugees fleeing Fascist-like regimes in South and Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Under the sadistic policy of the Left-wing Labour Party and its shrew, Choleria Gizzard, and her replacement, Kevin “Bloody” Rudd, these incredibly harried and brave people, probably mostly seeking asylum because of the physical persecution of themselves or their communities, are to be detained and segregated in “detention camps” in Papua New Guinea, a place with a horrendous rape and unemployment problem, and will never be admitted to Aussie-Nirvana. Somehow these Middle Easterners and Tamils are supposed to “integrate” into a completely foreign culture to theirs, which cannot even employ all its own citizens, and which is incredibly violent. What a bunch of lice are the Aussie politicians, both Labour and so-called Liberal.

And in Italy, we see an old Nazi War Criminal, a mass murderer of young boys and old men, living a comfortable retired life in an apartment, free to come and go shopping, and supposedly under “house arrest” — this the decision of the Italian Government and Courts. The 335 murdered old men and young boys this man helped shoot in the back of the head have lain in their graves for 69 years, while Erich Priebke has enjoyed a comfortable life in Argentina and now Italy, and nothing is done about it. At the least, Priebke should be kept in chains in solitary, and forced to wash prison dishes all day long for his plate of gruel, until he dies. Is there not one person in Italy willing to bring justice to Erich Priebke, SS War Criminal?

And over in our own Paradise, in Mr. Moonbeam’s “cool” California, prisoners, who have been on hunger strike to protest the horrendous numbers of people being sadistically kept in solitary confinement for years, are going to be force-fed against their wills, a vile violation of Libertarian self-ownership of one’s body. Prisoners should never be force-fed in jails, although if a prisoner goes on hunger strike, the custodial authorities should then be let off the hook as far as their responsibility in keeping the prisoner healthy and alive. If a Prisoner chooses to fast himself to death, or to the point where he passes out, he should be allowed to do so, although once he is passed out, it is permissible to give him nourishment or other physical succor, since he is not objecting at all at that moment of unconsciousness. Just because they are imprisoned, prisoners do not lose their inalienable right to self-ownership, so well defined in Libertarian Doctrine. That right is merely circumcised in the circumference of its practice by the confinement of the cell. But within the Prisoner’s skin, he is still King, or even better, Jeffersonian Citizen of America. What a phoney, classic Politician is Governor Jerry Brown.

The only antidote to this horrendous violence we see in the world is a radical Libertarian Revolution in people’s political and philosophical thinking, first in the West, and then in some of the more repressive regimes that are nominally semi-Democratic but mostly Fascistic, like India and Malaysia, where there is little recourse against police brutality, and finally in the real outhouse regimes, like Kazakhstan, Zimbabwe, Syria and North Korea. China will undergo an internal Libertarian Revolution eventually, perhaps after they have been allowed to read the blogs of Silverwolf; after all, it is the home of Taoism, that Radically-Libertarian Religion or Philosophy.

Only such a Libertarian Revolution in consciousness and economic thinking, and a bringing to justice of all the perpetrators of anti-Libertarian Human Rights Crimes around the Globe, from the highest officials, politicians, and war criminals, to the lowest cop and prison guard, will rectify the mess on our Planet. We must put the planet in order by legitimizing the Anarchy of Freedom for the Individual, Liberty, but Liberty only up to the point where it begins to aggress against another Individual, should be the Universal Doctrine of all Mankind.

Currently, we have true Anarchy without any Individual Rights in this world, the world created by the Politicians and Governments. Let’s jail the Criminals and vote the Bums out!

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf