Archive for the ‘racism’ Category

Uzis for French Jews: The Libertarian Solution

July 22, 2014

We warned long ago that Euro-Socialism would lead to racism, and racism where there is gun control leads to racist riots like the Jew-hater Riots in Paris we’ve just read about in the news. The Islamo-Nazi Jew-haters are free to riot in Paris, burning Jewish-owned shops and a synagogue, while the police refuse to gun them down, and the Jews are denied the inalienable Natural Right to defend themselves with guns. Do you think this would have happened if Jews were free to own Uzis in France?

Under Libertarian Law, you have the Right to defend yourself if any man or group of men assault your person or property. If France had followed Libertarian Law, there would have been dozens less racists infesting France after this riot than before.

The French Government, which has failed to protect Jews and has denied them the right to gun down those trying to murder them, should immediately issue an order that all Jews in France be permitted to own automatic and semi-automatic weapons like Uzis, and the Israeli Government should ship them there.

This is the final solution to Racist Nazi Property-Rights Criminals. The Libertarian Solution.

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

Advertisements

If the Ukraine Were Mexico: A Parallelogram Situation Fantasy

March 9, 2014

Silverwolf has just read the BBC headline that a Professor had said that, yes, the invasion or incursion into Crimea by probably Russian troops was a violation of International Law. Duh, of course it is.

But so is overthrowing a democratically elected government by force with mobs murdering police, and then tolerating Nazis in five of the cabinet positions in the new, overthrown government. Liberal Democrats would condemn to High Hell any Nazi or KKK elements that showed up at a Tea Party or Libertarian or Ron Paul rally and patrolled the crowd with baseball bats and Swastika armbands, but here is Barack Obama and Diplomat Nuland funelling over $5 billion dollars to a government that is largely Nazi and which tolerates many Nazi groups. Ron Paul was criticized by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an enabler of Fascism; I wonder what they would call President Obama’s actions in installing Nazis in a government overthrown by violent Anarchists and Nazis who would have been mowed down in America if they had got anywhere near the White House, and Silverwolf wouldn’t have had much sympathy for them, because that is not the way you change government. You do it through elections, or through non-violent Gandhian methods like the Boycott or the General Strike or the picket line or the sit-in, as long as you don’t block the fire exits. But when you storm buildings, and burn police to death, and beat police armed only with shields… well, for America to legitimize that with its support is a great tragedy. And for jolly Old England too, the birthplace of Libertarianism and Free-Market (along with Holland), or at least as Free-Market as it was possible to be in those mercantilist days, when the Monarchy was the equivalent of the Congress, Presidency, Supreme Court and Federal Reserve combined into one half-senile (from inbreeding) megalomaniac.

So Putin’s incursion into a region that would be almost certainly pro-Russian in a Democratic election is called a violation of international law, as it probably technically is, but Obama’s backing of violent Nazis who overthrow a Democratic election is honky-dorey, huh? That’s your “liberal Democrat” Obama.

Obama is a lunatic, and he is bringing us to the brink of a world war, for no valid reasons. Elections were coming up soon in Ukraine. If Yanuko had been tried for his crimes, that would have been an orderly, legalistic and just way of handling the situation. But violently overthrowing him, and then blaming Putin for putting his troops in when a Nazi has just been installed as Defense Minister, and another as Chief Prosecutor, is just insane. What is going on in that brain of Obama’s? Any half-drunk bar room philosopher could have predicted this one. Of course Putin wasn’t going to sit around and do nothing when, as Professor Steven Cohen of NYU and Princeton so aptly put it, you’ve moved the Berlin Wall from Germany to the edge of Russia. And the NATO threat to give missiles to the new Nazi Government? How did our great statesman President think Russia was going to react to that one after the history of World War II? That heckler who heckled Obama about when was World War III going to start really hit the nail on the head.  The President tried to laugh it off, rather hollowly we thought, but that heckler was more realistic than our Chief Executive. The President, this so-called Liberal who supports Nazi thugs in government, has rekindled the Cold War in a few short days with his stupidity. Add ‘im to Aretha’s Chain of Fools.

Silverwolf, as you know, loathes Vlad Putin for his equivalent of a war crime in aiding Syria, Iran, and Libya under the War Criminal Ghaddafi, as well as his murder of a defenseless whale, worth much more than his miserable carcass, but he’d never watched Putin in detail, except for a few minutes of his recent press conference. So he went back and watched the entire hour-long conference, and was fascinated.

There are several striking things about Putin. First, he looks like he doesn’t have a wrinkle on his face. Make up? Or a guy who sleeps soundly at night. Secondly, he talks very fluently, like a lawyer. No Ron Paul-esque flounderings around like a beached seal, filled with “you knows” for Putin; he had very few pauses. And he seemed to know exactly what he wanted to say. Silverwolf nyet knows Rooskee, so he didn’t know precisely what he was saying, but he sounded calm, and not very vicious. Also, he seemed to be giving quite depthful analyses and reasons for what he was doing, building the case that a democratically-elected President, who had been violently overthrown, had requested that he intervene in his country. That sounds pretty International-Law-ish to Silverwolf. If President Obama were overthrown in an invasion by Cuba, or overthrown by violent mobs funded by Cuba, and he fled to Canada and asked the Canadian Prime Minister to intervene to protect the lives of Americans from Cuban mobs, wouldn’t that be justified? So Putin’s incursion into Crimea might be technically a violation of International Law, but Crimea was artifically annexed to Ukraine by Krushchev (Nikita S. — and please don’t forget the “S” so you don’t confuse him with another Nikita Krushchev), so why is the world suddenly so eager to acknowledge the validity of that action by the Soviet dictator of that day on this issue?

But what was most striking about what he was saying was that most of it was interesting. How many politicians could you listen to who could give you an interesting and depthful analysis of a current critical situation that sounded like a deep-thinking university professor? Putin was interesting; Obama is boring.

Some of his dodges, though, were a bit ridiculous. He claimed that no Russian troops had entered Crimea, and those armed men were all pro-Russian people’s militias. You know, you can buy those uniforms in an army surplus store, he argued. But he said it in way that showed he obviously didn’t believe it himself.

The other thing about Putin is his appearance. He has such a characteristically Russian face, if there is such a thing, you could see why they picked him for the KGB. And he has such a weird look in his eye when he looks straight at the camera, and appears to be ever-so-slightly cross-eyed, that it gives him the appearance of intense, almost fanatical, concentration. Finally, his face is extremely animated as he talks, the eyebrows going up and down, the cheeks scrunching. At one moment, a reporter’s musical cellphone goes off, and Putin looks a little exasperated, but is courteous and waits till the woman leaves the room with a comment like “pretty music”, but you could see that the King of the Russian Empire wasn’t too pleased about a stupid reporter interrupting his press conference. Silverwolf can’t blame him.

So Silverwolf hates to say it, but he almost liked Putin, or at least, was quite impressed with his intelligence, and the depth of his thinking. He can see why Russians could like him, and he certainly isn’t letting the flies grow on him when Nazis are coming to power right on his borders; Nazis armed with nuclear missiles and backed by Germany. Putin really kneed the hypocrisy of the West in the groin with his incisive comments, especially after all the garbage one has heard being drummed out in the U.S. press and the BBC. And Silverwolf is damn glad those ethnic Russians and Tartars in the Crimea will have Russian soldiers around to protect them from the Nazi gangs roaming around Kiev, now being given legitimacy by the Obama Administration by calling them the Provisional Government.

Now, let’s imagine a parallelogram fantasy.

What if… in North Mexico a movement arises calling itself L’Azteca Action, which claims that Gringos, Americanos, Protestants, and Capitalists run the entire economy of the region, grinding the poor Mexicans into the dirt, and that they should be expelled and their property confiscated, and that the People want a pure Mexican Mexico. They advocate making Spanish the only legal language. Then there are several assaults on Protestants by gangs of Catholics resulting in hospitalizations, and a general hostility is whipped up against American retirees who are “bleeding the land and El Pueblo Mexicano.” Capitalism is denounced, and murderers of American civilians during the Revolution, like Pancho Villa with his raids in New Mexico, are glorified. Villa is called a great hero, a Mexican Patriot, and his crimes are overlooked. Gangs of thugs armed with baseball bats and dressed in T-shirts bearing pictures of Villa, and the symbol of Villa’s militia which had carried out atrocities against women and children during the Revolution, patrol the streets as “security”, and the chief of police of the entire region as well as the chief prosecutor are L’Azteca Action party members.

Then it turns out that Russia has funnelled over $5 billion to L’Azteca to stir up trouble in the region, and suddenly tens of thousands of terrified American retirees, Protestants, and businessmen are fleeing to the border and stampeding into America. There is extensive media footage of American ex-pats kissing American soil upon arrival at the U.S. Border at Calexico and Naco. When L’Azteca gangs begin to overrun government buildings in areas where democratic local elections had protected the Rights of Americans, Protestants, and Capitalists, and a Party member, who has called these three groups “scum”, heads the Security Ministry, then President Obama decides to send American Troops into those border regions where Americans, Protestants, non-Mexicans, Capitalists, etc. form 70%-plus majorities, to protect American Citizens, and there are welcoming crowds lining the roads, waving American flags. In response to the American “invasion” of Mexico, Russian President Putin warns America that it is violating International Law and there will be a heavy price to pay. The rhetoric and name-calling escalates on both sides. Defiant, the American President maintains his troops in Northern Mexico, and brings in even more troops to protect other non-Fascist regions. Putin, claiming the moral high ground, and talking about morality and principle, offers to supply L’Azteca Action with nuclear weapons, according to a NATO-like treaty the Russians have with Mexico to come to its aid if its sovereignty was ever threatened, and in order to “protect the Mexican People and show that infringements of International Law have their costs.” And, inevitably, when L’Azteca Action, supported by all the Latin American nations, gets its missiles, it immediately demands the return of the lands stolen by America during the Mexican-American War which the Great Libertarian Henry David Thoreau went to jail resisting. That includes California, Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada. Just give us that, and there will be Peace, cries L’Azteca Action, and massive, violent mobs all across Northern Mexico, whipped up by State media propaganda, demonstrate in support. War Against the Capitalists, Gringos, English-speakers, and any Mexican against our Holy Cause! Liberate Nevada! Free California. New Mexico for the Mexicans!

And soon the missiles start flying.

Putin’s incursion is illegal, and so was Yanuko’s overthrow. But the practical effect of Obama’s actions is to throw Russia into a huge insecurity. After all, this could well mean NATO missiles in the hands of a Nazi Regime right on Russia’s borders; a Regime, backed by Germany, which had fought with Nazi Germany against Russia, and murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians, while glorifying mass murderers of Poles and Jews like Stefan Bandera and Chmelnitsky. Of course this was going to make Russia paranoid, and make all the ethnic Russians, and what was left of the Jews and Poles in Ukraine after the decimations of World War II, very insecure. Any idiot could have figured that out, but Obama couldn’t. This action shows that he is not fit to be President, and out of touch with reality. This is a very dangerous miscalculation by the President, and shows his lack of true Statesmanship.

Put yourself in the Russian’s place, America. Would you want a fanatical, bloodthirsty Pancho Villa to have nuclear weapons on your border, pointing at you? That is what Russians must be feeling right now. The Bipartisan Fascists, led by President Obama, have set the Cold War and World Progress back about a quarter-century with their and his stupid, puerile, and very dangerous actions. What a great tragedy for the world, and for America. And what a blundering fool is the President of the United States.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Obama Backs The Ukrainian Nazis: At Your Throat or At Your Feet

March 7, 2014

There’s an old saying about Nazis that Barack Obama seems to have forgotten or never heard: Nazis, they’re either at your throat or at your feet. By backing the new Nazi so-called “Government” of the Svoboda Party and the Right Sektor in Kiev, President Obama has committed one of the greatest political mistakes of this century so far, and it is truly disgusting, but not surprising, to see the sickening hypocrisy of Obama, John Kerry, and Ms. Rodham as they carry out this destabalization of Russia’s border region by bringing to power, and endorsing, a regime with racist values so sickening, that they are fit for the KKK. In America, anyone who exhibits the slightest racism is condemned by the Democrats as some unspeakable horror, but here they are staunchly supporting a bunch of Jew-hating, and Russian-hating racists.

The following excellent article by Prof. Mark Chussodovsky not only lists the proofs for the assertion that this is a Nazi regime, but also proves it with photos. Here is the Racist Tanybuk giving the Nazi salute, and here is a beaming Nuland standing smiling with the Nazi racist Scum. Obama has legitimized Fascism, and here is the proof.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-u-s-has-installed-a-neo-nazi-government-in-ukraine/5371554

The BBC too finally did a report on the Nazi elements in Svoboda and Right Sektor, interviewing the head of a militia that is tied to the Svoboda party. He blamed Ukraines problems on the economic control of the economy by “Russians, Jews, and Poles”. So we can see what is coming. These racist divisionists, who breed discord and hate in society, now control the Defense Ministry and five top cabinet posts in the regime, and you can be sure they will follow the same plan as the Nazis did in Germany when they took over. Anyone wanting to know in detail how this was done should read the vital work, “The Nazi Seizure of Power” by William Sheridan Allen, published by Franklin Webb, inc., 1973. In this work, Allen describes how the Nazis took over a medium-sized German town, mainly by getting all the Socialists, Social Democrats, and anyone who opposed them fired. Part of the reason they took over too was the namby-pamby whimpish resistance of the Socialists and Social Democrats in comparison to the fanaticism of the Nazis. The Ukrainian Nationalist Nazis plan to eliminate many government positions in the name of saving money and purging corrupt officials, but you can be sure that the axe will fall on ethnic Russian, Jews, Poles, and Communists. The Nazis will control the cops; they will be the cops, and they ain’t going to stop there. These Nazis want violence, and anyone who thinks they will not exhibit their violence once they’re in power should watch the BBC report on them.

The following informative posts by anti-Fascist Historian Dave Emory, in addition to those of his we mentioned in our previous post, also round out the picture of the Nazi stink in Kiev that the Western media is ignoring. The Confederate Stars and Bars is now disgustingly displayed in Kiev Square, and Peace Street has been renamed after the mass murder’s Nazi batallion. Thanks, Obama. You’ve stabbed the Nazi’s 40 million victims in the back, and condoned and encouraged the modern Skinhead movement, while managing to re-inflame the long-embered Cold War.

http://spitfirelist.com/news/confederate-flags-in-kiev-and-peace-street-renamed-for-the-einsatzgruppe-nachtigall/

http://spitfirelist.com/news/ounb-heirs-hold-prominent-ministerial-posts-in-ukraine/

As you know from previous posts, Silverwolf is no lover of Vladimir Putin, but in this case, we think he is right. The deposed democratically-elected President has been overthrown by mobs of anarchists; he carried over 70% of the vote in Crimea and close to that in the East according to the BBC map of how Ukraine voted, and here are a bunch of racist Nazis threatening Russians, Jews, and Poles. They murder six cops in the demonstrations. They rename a street after the batallion that fought with the Germans and carried out mass murder of Poles and Jews, they daub Nazi slogans on a statue of Lenin, and wear the armbands of the OUN/B Ukrainian Nationalists who fought with Hitler, but Obama and the West and the Western Media are completely silent, showing how deeply corrupt is the Democratic Party, the West in general, and the Western news media.

Silverwolf watched Putin addressing the press, and it was the first time he’d ever watched him during an interview. One noticed the animation of his visage as he went through an entire series of facial movements, while he sounded like he was talking rather calmly. He pointed out the hypocrisy of the Americans, and explained that a democratically-elected President who had been violently deposed had asked for his intervention, that there were close cultural, ethnic, and economic ties to the Russian population in Ukraine, and he intended to go in and protect those people if they were threatened or killed.

President Obama seems to have no inkling whatsoever of the psychological impact  in Russia of having 20 million of their people murdered in Hitler’s war, and the rage that must be welling up in people who have heard from their grandparents and parents what the Germans, with the aid of their Ukrainian OUN/B allies, did during World War II. Obama seems to have huge lapses of judgement that make him a real liability as President. We always thought that a man who could attend for twenty years a congregation that gave its man of the year award to the racist and Jew-baiter, Louis Farrakhan, must be either very callous, very dull, or a crypto-anti-Semite. Maybe he’s all three?

Obama has managed to rekindle the Cold War in order to destabilize a democratically-elected regime. If Yanukovich was corrupt, and he sure was, he should have been tried and jailed, as would have happened in an orderly, democratic or republican society with a Bill of Rights. But he was overthrown by a mob led by racist Nazis, and Vladimir Putin is not going to sit around with his finger up his ear and let the Nazis destabilize his Western borders. And by the way, if Obama is such a lover of Democracy, why does he object to Crimea holding a referendum on whether to join Russia or not? We’re told the Crimea is an “autonomous region” within Ukraine, so if they are truly autonomous, why should they not vote democratically on their future? If Obama truly believed in Democracy, he would endorse this referendum. But he’s as wooden and robotic as George Dubbyah; just another immoral politican.

Unfortunately, it’s just a matter of time we think before the Nazi stink starts rising from Kiev and its environs. At your throat or at your feet is no empty observation.

Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Hilary Clinton have revived the Nazi State, to their great shame, and the misery of all the non-Nazis in the Ukraine. They will regret it, and be damned and reviled when the final history of Fascism and Nazism is written.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Obama Backs Ukrainian Fascists While Putin Gets One Right

March 2, 2014

You have to wonder at the stupidity of Barack Obama, as he threatens Russia by backing the remnants of the OUN/B Ukrainian Nazis who fought with Hitler in WWII and carried out the genocide of the Ukrainian Jews. The virulent Jew-hatred of these new Nazis is evident by their many public statements, some pronounced in the Parliament. Anti-Fascist Historian Dave Emory has done a capital job at documenting the links between the old OUN/B Nazis and the modern “protest” movement in the Ukraine, and the posts listed below provide that documentation.

One wonders how the U.S. Federal Marshals and SWAT teams would have reacted if racist mobs stormed and burned Federal Government buildings, burned alive and murdered Federal Marshals and National Guardsmen, and tried to stage a coup in one of the Fifty U.S. States. Say too that it came out that the overthrowers of our U.S. democratically-elected government were receiving funds from the Soviet Union, as the Ukrainian movement has received funds from the U.S. A.I.D. program, and that a top advisor to the Russian President had been intercepted in a phone conversation saying whom they thought should be installed in power after that State’s government had been overthrown. One wonders how the American Public would have reacted if the news got out that Russia, or Saudi Arabia, or Japan were backing the anarchists with money, and had had secret cables intercepted telling whom they wanted put into power after the overthrow of the government. Obama can dish it out, but you wonder how he would take that.

You should watch some of the footage of these anarchists setting policemen on fire, and beating them with wooden clubs, setting up catapaults to launch Molotov Cocktails, metal projectiles, and paving stones into the police lines, and spraying the police with who-knows-what. How would such treatment be tolerated by, say, the L.A.P.D. that beat Rodney King?

Certainly the government these people were trying to overthrow was a corrupt regime, as is Russia itself, and unfortunately as are most countries around the world, almost 240 years after Thomas Jefferson’s Glorious Revolution, as Glorious in its way as Oliver Cromwell’s, which put a stop to absolute tyrannical Monarchy, that accursed institution. (However, England now wears it well, and even Lord Bertrand Russell supported the Monarchy, on the grounds that it was a sort of Fourth Estate, that could express its opinion if it didn’t approve of the way government was running England, and carry a lot of weight with the public. In other words, the modern Monarchy was a further check on absolute power by any one branch of government.) And it looked like the government used snipers to deliberately murder demonstrators who were not immediately threatening any police. But after the burning, beatings, and murder of other police officers, it’s little wonder they resorted to murderous force. After all, this is Ukraine and Russia, not Mayberry with Andy Griffith and Don Knotts as cops. Russia lost 20 million because of Hitler and his Ukrainian allies. They haven’t forgotten that fact like Obama has.

However, it’s obvious that the Democrat Obama is backing a bunch of Racists that would be right at home in the Ol’ Mississippi and Alabam of the pre-1960s; Racists and xenophobes whose neo-Nazi philosophy would fit right in with the KKK. This is well documented in Historian Emory’s latest posts on spitfirelist.com, http://spitfirelist.com/. the first two giving historical documentation of the Nazi roots and xenophobia of the protest movement, and the last the most recent post as we write, and as the BBC reports the Ukrainian Army on alert. This information is critical in seeing the situation in its true light, and not as just a Libertarian Free Speech movement going up against Clark Kerr at U.C. Berkeley, or the police riot of the Democrat Criminal, Mayor Richard Daley, and his Chicago police, clubbing Vietnam War Protesters, while War Criminal Democrat Hubert Humphrey spoke to the Democratic Convention. Here are Emory’s documentary posts on the Neo-Nazis that Obama is supporting with U.S. Taxpayer’s dollars: http://spitfirelist.com/news/the-ideology-and-electoral-gravitas-of-swoboda-ukrainian-heirs-to-the-ounb/,http://spitfirelist.com/news/more-on-ounb-influence-on-the-ukrainian-political-opposition/, http://spitfirelist.com/news/ukraine-update-pierre-omidyar-glenn-greenwalds-financial-angel-helped-finance-coup-swedish-neo-nazi-milieu-of-carl-lundstrom-assisting-ounb-heirs/,

And you thought they were Libertarian Saints.

If these Nazis are allowed to overthrow and establish their own racist government by force, it will be the first time in the Western World since the days of the Segregationist South that a far-Right Nazi power has held sway over an entire country or huge region. There was no law in the old South, but Robert Kennedy busted that all apart. This is a return to that Old South, and Obama is so limited in vision, that he can’t see that incredibly significant fact. It is a return to the Dark Age of Segregation, of Racism, and its ultimate crime against Libertarianism, Slavery.

What a nerve Obama has to threaten Russia. Russia may be a cesspool of corruption, of police torture with impunity, of anti-Libertarian laws against Gays, of xenophobia and anti-Semitism, and Putin is a War Criminal without doubt for his actions in Syria and transfering weapons to the Hezballah terrorist Racists via Iran, but on this issue he is right to flex the Russian military as a deterrent to the Ukrainian Nazis, and it’s pretty obvious that in Eastern Ukraine and the Crimea, the people overwhelmingly want to keep their ties with Russia. Maybe they can see how miserable life in the  racist EU is, and they like the perks of aligning with Russia. Living under Putin would be much better than living under Hitler, or one of his Bandera proxies.

So Obama and Nuland can plot regime change with their favorite Nazis and threaten Russia, and Obama can talk of “peaceful engagement with the opposition”, much as Neville Chamberlain did, with the result of 40 million murdered, while at the same time that Fascist-lover Hypocrite in the White House can maintain his embargo of Cuba, because of its ties with Russia. What a double standard, and what an illustration of the President’s lack of brains. He may be the clever lawyer, but he has no wisdom, or seemingly no awareness of the political impact of his actions and words.

And now he backs Nazi Racists. What a shower.

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Arizona’s SB 1062: Here Come the Racists

February 25, 2014

Arizona’s SB 1062 is an unlawful, and probably unConstitutional, Racist attempt to overthrow the laws of the United States, which forbid discriminating in business based on race, color, creed, etc. and now so-called sexual orientation.

Now, Silverwolf discussed in detail in his blog, “Is It Constitutional in America to Discriminate in a Business?: An Internal Debate”, https://lobobreed.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/is-it-legal-in-america-to-discriminate-in-a-business-an-internal-debate/, whether it was Consitutional and/or legal to discriminate in business, and he went through an entire series of arguments and counter=arguments with himself, finally arriving at the conclusion that it was indeed illegal. Why?

It is illegal simply because businesses advertise their products priced in U.S. dollars, that is, Federal Reserve Notes. Now, it says on those notes that they are legal tender for all debts, public and private, and thus, if someone operates a business, and offers a good or service priced in U.S. dollars, then they must accept your legal tender note, since the government has promised you already that such a note is legal tender for any private debt, which is the price of the goods or service. Thus, the seller would be forced to accept these notes if he has offered goods or services to the public, either by being open for business, placing his prices in his windows or attached to the items in the store, or advertising them in the media. They are publicly offered debts, and in a real sense, that person has offered a contract to all comers that he will trade his good or service for their Federal Reserve Notes. To refuse to serve them would be to Violate a Contract, which is a Crime in both theoretical Libertarian doctrine and actual U.S. Law. This would be true even if the note was an old Silver or Gold Certificate note, backed by precious metal. (However, if the person paid in Silver or Gold Coinage, then they might well be able to discriminate, but that is another legal discussion, and here we are dealing solely with Federal Reserve Notes. But we’re certain, given the “dedication” and religous purity of these people who don’t want to do business with Gays, that if they were running a Restaurant that served $300 dinners, and a Gay wanted to purchase a dinner and pay his bill in $20 Gold pieces or Silver Dollars, that they would steadfastly refuse them service — that’s how religiously dedicated and pure they are.And we’re sure that if they suddenly needed emergency medical assistance and were rushed to a doctor, and the doctor was a Muslim, and refused on religious grounds to treat, or even touch, the sinful flesh of any non-Muslim, that they would understand, and respect his Religious Liberties, and die quickly.)

Now the so-called Conservative Group that is advocating this anti-Capitalist Law, the Center for Arizona Policy, states “SB 1062 seeks to ensure that state laws that violate the religious liberties of private persons cannot be enforced simply because the government is not technically a party to the case.”

But that “the government is not technically a party to the case” is precisely a big whopping Lie, as we have illustrated above. The Federal goverment is a party to the case, because it says on the Federal Reserve Note that the Federal government says this is a legal tender note that can be used to service any private debt anywhere in America, regardless of in what State, and the seller of the goods or service is refusing to accept what the Federal government has ordered him to accept if he is going to price his goods and services in U.S. Dollars. So the government is right in the midst of the trade, and is thus very clearly a party to the case. The contract they promised to the bearer was violated by the seller, and thus the seller must be punished under Law.

Now, if the seller could price his goods or services in, say, Swiss Francs or conch shells or ounces of tea, then perhaps the seller might be able to legally discriminate in his business, but this again is a different political theory question, and alternate currencies are viewed with askance by the U.S. Treasury and the government, although in a Libertarian Free-Market Society we should be able to price or purchase items in whatever currencies we, the buyer and seller, can agree on. If we think the Zimbabwean Shilling is sounder than the U.S. Dollar, then we should, in a Libertarian Society, be able to conduct our Free Market in whatever currency we choose. That would be a truly Free Market, and will come in the Future. But, here and now in America, if you price something in U.S. Dollars, and publicly advertise it, the buyer should be able to settle the debt in U.S. Dollars, whomever they are, and the government must guarantee that reality.

And finally, if your religous liberties make it impossible for you to conduct your business in America in Federal Reserve Notes, as under current law, then you’re always free to not start a business that will violate those liberties, and your always free to seek your living in some other manner, or starve to death. (Oh, we forgot, there are food stamps even for Racists, paid for by some poor Black working stiff.)

This Bill is nothing but a Communist-Racist attempt to instill that Ol’ Southern Segregation in the midst of Arizona.The Governor of Arizona should lob a big lunger of Libertarian Free Market Spit on this unAmerican Bill, and veto it.

If the Governor signs the Bill, all Free Market non-Racist Americans should use that grand old Irish Free-Market weapon: the Boycott, and Boycott Arizona. Don’t go there, and don’t buy their products.

If the Governor signs the Bill, then, as they used to say in the ghetto, “Boycott, Baby, Boycott!”

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

Fresh Thoughts on Libertarianism

October 5, 2013

Certain ideas about Libertarianism have coalesced in Silverwolf’s mind, and the cats have threatened to go on strike if he doesn’t disclose them to the Public. (Labor Union Coercion!)

First off, Libertarianism is a vast, vast field or ocean, that is just being entered upon. It’s a long way to the other side, before one is debouched into Paradise. So this means that all thinking about the political Philosophy of Libertarianism is in the stage of infancy. It is as if “Democracy” had just come on the scene and was five years old, and every Greek was throwing in his two drachmas as to what it meant and how to define it.

So “Libertarianism” is just beginning, and since it is such a powerful philosophy — this Philosophy of Classical Liberalism — it will have many courtiers claiming that their brand is “His” brand above.

In Silverwolf’s brand of Libertarianism, four ingredients are necessary.

First, Individual Libertarianism must always be put above Corporate so-called Libertarianism, although Libertarianism should not entertain any unnecessary hostility towards Corporations, as long as they obey the Libertarian Non-Aggression Axiom. A share in a Corporation which has value on the open market should be treated just as any other form of private property, although while an individual income tax would be anathema to the Rights delineated in Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence, a Corporate Income Tax would not necessarily also be, because it taxes a Collective notional Institution, not an Individual.

So first, the Individual’s Rights must always be placed above the so-called rights of a coroporation.

Second, Libertarianism must fight to shore up and defend Jefferson’s “Wall of Separation” between Church and State. Church-State linkages throughout history have been disastrous both for the people and for Free-Market Capitalism, with the exception of the military hardware suppliers. We only have to look today at “religious” regimes throughout the world to see the most despicable forms of tyranny and torture being perpetrated, and to realize that little has changed since the Spanish Inquisition if Organized Religion once gets its bloody paws on the reins of government. Just as Free-Market Capitalist Libertarians call for separation of Business and State, so must they call for and maintain separation of Church and State, and a very strict separation at that.

Finally, while Libertarians believe that unconstitutional governmental laws should be overthrown in a day — laws like the individual income tax, or being forced into a government-run pension or medical-care scheme, or a “national service” involuntary servitude requirement, or the jailing of Americans by the hundreds of thousands for cannabis possession, or forcing Hindus, at the tax collector’s gunpoint, to fork over the fruits of their labor to pay for USDA beef inspections — we know that, given the public’s socialistic, big-government, brainwashing, it will not be so.

Thus, although you’d like to overthrow tyrranical laws in a day, Libertarian’s should probably settle for a gradualist framework for their change, because the American public is essentially conservative, and a conservative is someone who likes moderation. Southern Slavery, one of the Great Human Rights Crimes of recorded history, should have been overthrown in a day, but it took decades to burn its rotten carcass. Thus Libertarians should probably offer five to ten-year phaseouts of government programs like Social Security and Unemployment Insurance or Obamacare, not because we don’t think their injustices should be eliminated immediately, but because such a call would not be accepted by the majority of voters, but a gradual phaseout would be. We also think that maintaining these programs for those Socialists who think they are the greatest thing since Marx would be OK, as long as all the costs and all the liabilities fell completely on the shoulders of the program’s participants.

For example, if the State of California ended its mandatory, forced participation of all workers in the Unemployment Insurance Program, but then maintained a program called “California Unemployment Security Program” in which all costs and liabilities were thrown onto the program’s participants, and not the general taxpayer or anyone working in California, then we wouldn’t really object, although such programs should certainly not be within the pale of government functions in the mind of a true Jeffersonian Libertarian.

However, it is obvious that such a “State” program would be “State” only in name, and that such a program would not differ at all from a private, free-market insurance fund. The Socialists and Patriots could feel they were contributing to “their” government, since they both are fond of saying that “the government is us”, and they could walk away with that glow lonely Socialists feel when they kid themselves that “we’re a village”. Yet, they never seem to pool their bank accounts.

Lastly, Libertarianism must be fiercely anti-racist in its outlook, because the racist looks at others with an image in his mind, a pre-judgement. Just as the Marxist defines Individuals by their class, and always attempts character assassination by class association instead of argument, so too will the racist define individuals according to whatever images his exposure to propaganda has inclined him. A racist can obviously utter words that reflect Truth and point out an injustice, while a non-racist or anti-racist can utter false propaganda (and all propaganda is a lie!) and keep mum about heinous injustices which they perpetrate (the Democrats, for example, jailing people for cannabis possession and keeping it illegal, or deforesting the National Forests to benefit major corporations while spreading toxic pesticides far and wide).

So a racist, like a Marxist, pre-judges people based on the most infantile and neanderthalic thinking, whereas a Libertarian sees all men as possessors of sacred Natural Rights, which make them the highest creation of Nature. A True Libertarian would have a positive, non-aggressive attitude towards all, except those who want to violently aggress against the property rights (which include the bodies) of their fellow citizens, or those who want to incite hatred or violence against whole economic classes, religious groups, races, or nationalities. Such Individuals are anti-Libertarian and anti-Capitalist, though they may mascarade as Libertarians, or friends of Natural Rights.

The essence of Capitalism is Liberty, the Freedom of two Individual Human Beings to engage in a trade of commodities voluntarily, in which both parties are happy with the results. Primitive tribesman did this in the jungle, but the modern day Socialists say that such actions are wicked.

So Libertarianism, at least Silverwolf’s brand, must include placing the Individual above the Collectivist Corporation, a fierce separation of Mosque and State, an anti-racist and anti-xenophobic ferocity, and a defense and championing of Liberty, as the essential ingredient of Free-Market Capitalism.

What’s your brand of Libertarianism?

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Ron Paul Self-Taints: Hanging Out with the Racists

September 27, 2013

Ron Paul’s recent speaking engagement at a fundraiser for a Holocaust-denying, renegade Catholic priest, who has been thrown out of the Church by the Vatican, combined with his nearly simultaneous interview of the anti-Semite, Julian Assange, on Paul’s web channel, have seriously damaged his credibility in this observer’s eyes, and makes us wonder if our long support of Ron Paul and his principles was mis-directed.

On the Principles for which he has argued, and they are the Jeffersonian Principles of Good Governance, the Natural Rights Liberty of the Individual, and the Free-Market, we have little disagreement.  After reading of the allegations against Ron Paul, many times seemingly blown up and repeated over and over by the liberal-left Democratic media without quoting the actual abuses, and given the economic value to the vested interests that benefit from all the abuses in America that Ron Paul has argued against over and over, — given these two factors, we thought. during his two campaigns, that Ron Paul was being unfairly smeared by the Democratic Left, But these old allegations. in combination with Ron Paul’s recent hobnobbing with two notorious Holocaust-denying Jew-haters, make us believe that they could well be true. Ron Paul may mostly espouse the truth in his speeches, but these recent associations with Racists have tainted him irreparably in our view, and we’re pretty sure they will go on to taint his son when he runs for the Presidency, because if Rand Paul gains political momentum, then his father’s recent associations with Nazi ideologues will be brought up again and again, ruining his chances by association, and then the nation would be cursed with another Democratic Administration for at least four years. One might see 90% of a block of the largest minorities  in America voting in lock-step against Rand Paul, instead of voting for whomever the Democrats push up there as their next dummy, simply because of his father’s hobnobbing with pretty vicious Racists.

Evidently what outed Assange’s racism was an article in Private Eye magazine by the editor, Ian Hilsop, which pointed out the long association between Julian Assange and the Holocaust-denier and notorious anti-Semite, Israel Shamir ( so labelled by both the leftwing British daily, the Guardian, and also the NY Times). According to Hilsop, when Assange read the article, he called Hilsop, and accused him and two other editors of being part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him, although Hilsop isn’t Jewish, and the other two editors had Gentile mothers. Likewise Assange accused the producer of a BBC report critical of Wikileaks and Assange as having a “Zionist” wife, although the editor said that the charge was proposterous, pointed out that neither he nor his wife were even Jewish, and that she had never had any association with Zionism. Given the BBC’s own anti-Semitism in censoring listener responses critical of Arabs, but permitting blatantly anti-Semitic comments from Muslims, as well as the Guardian’s hypercritical attitude towards Israel, it is obvious that Assange has begun to revert to labelling anyone who points out his rotten associations with Racists, as being either part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him or a “Zionist”, the behaviour of a typical denuded Nazi.

Assange’s cyberparty, the Wikileaks Party, which campaigned in the recent Australian elections, and which Assange said in the Ron Paul interview was gaining 25-28% in pre-election polls. apparently crashed and burned when it turned on its proposed alliance with the environmentalist Green Party, and endorsed neo-Fascist parties like the Shooter’s Party, which wants to be able to go into any Australian National Park and murder defenseless animals at will, and the Australia First party, a foreigner-hating bunch of  White foreigners who stole Australia from the Aborigines. Evidently, that awoke the Australian Greens to the real meaning of the Wikileaks Party, and the Party melted down, receiving 0.62% of the vote, after Assange’s above prediction on TV of polling 25-28%. Quite a melt down.

Tragically, these are the type of folks that Ron Paul gives speeches for, and has on his TV show. It might be that Ron Paul is willing to talk to anyone, no matter if they are a racist or not, but personally we wonder how any true Libertarian could hold racist views, since Libertarians regard all men as being equally endowed with certain unalienable Rights, and a racist would have to view some men as being unequally endowed, or not having free-will at all because of their  genetic heritage.  Personally, we think a Racist differs little from a Communist or Socialist who would rob a man of the fruits of his labor, and one should have no contact with either. Both are haters, one of a race, the other of an entire economic class, and one contaminates oneself if one hangs out with either of them, although non-racist Socialists and Libertarians could work together politically on Civil Rights issues, like the Right to Privacy, or opposition to Corporate subsidies, or opposing a peacetime draft or “national service”, or protecting Nature to preserve Capitalism and Life on Earth. Both Racists and Communists would employ terror or violence, and whip up animus against their chosen targets; a Libertarian never, except for an animus against war, injustice, and environmental rape.

Nor should one conclude that all Ron Paul supporters or admirers of Julian Assange are necessarily or even mostly Fascists or Nazis. On the contrary, we’d say that the vast majority of Ron Paul’s rank-and-file supporters are rabidly anti-Fascist, which is why they admire him and what he has said in his campaigns so much. Likewise, many Julian Assange admirers have no idea of his connections with the foaming-at-the-mouth Jew-hater, Israel Shamir (a pseudonym). What they see is someone speaking out against the massive invasions of Privacy conducted by so many world governments, and the subjugation of the Individual around the globe. One might classify them generally as anarcho-utopians, which is pretty far from Hitlerism or Russian Stalinism.

We believe the principles of the Free-Market, of Individual Liberty, and the defense of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are the best prophylactics against the Nazi disease, a disease of Collectivism in combination with Racism. Jeffersonian Libertarianism virtually precludes the establishment of such a Nazi state or system. In fact, if Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi as some have alleged, then it is ironic that his campaigning has done more to establish a broad anti-Nazi, anti-Totalitarian mentality in the American Electorate than perhaps any other modern-day American politician, and possibly, if his motives are really to establish a Nazi State as some allege, he is so stupid as to actually have initiated widespread attitudes against Nazism and Authoritarianism in the American Public.

Ron Paul should consider that the fees he earned at the Fatima “Peace” Conference, and his friendly interview with Julian Assange on his station, may mean in the long run that Senator Ted Cruz becomes President of the United States, instead of Senator Rand Paul. As Martin Bright, a British Labour Party political analyst, explained so well, “If you choose to tolerate or defend a nasty antisemite, it is only a matter of time before people begin to wonder if you are a nasty antisemite yourself.”  And as wise Ben Franklin observed, “He who lies down with dogs, shall rise up with fleas.”

Why are you scratching your head, Dr. Paul?

Hoooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

West Coast Democrats Crucify Black Youth: The Minimum Wage Law Nail

September 24, 2013

It looks like Democratic Governors Jerry Brown and John Kitzhaber have been taking turns smashing that final bolt into the right hand of Black Youth as they nail them down from any opportunity to earn some money, and crucify them with inaction at a time in their lives when they desperately need money, and the experience of handling it.

California’s raise of its minimum wage to $10/hr, and Oregon’s to $9.15/hr will crucify the Black Youth of both states, for, at such absurdly high wage levels, it is highly unlikely that many of them will be able to make enough profit for their employers that it becomes profitable to hire them. As usual, the well-fed, well-paid Democratic and Republican legislators who passed these heinous Bills will not mention the horrendous effects it will have on hundreds of thousands of lives in these two States. The Black Youth who will remain unemployed, though a job just came up that could have employed him at the old minimum wage rate but which can’t afford to employ him at the new one, and the White teenager who will also remain unemployed, or be laid off because his employer is now losing money on his labor, not making it, — both of these are the primary victims of the Democrat’s vile and successful attempt to disemploy them, so as to eliminate competition in the labor market and thus artificially boost the wages of union workers, who can live high on the misery of young Blacks.

What gives these millionaire and near-millionaire White Men the Right to ruin the lives of these young Black Men with their Fascistic minimum wage law, one of the key demands of the Communist manifesto? What gives these arrogant mountebank politicians the Right to keep a young Black Man unemployed for years in his youth, never gaining the skills he might have gained on a job if he had freely negotiated his wage with his employer on the Free-Market, as Free Men do, but who must submit himself to the Fascist whims of Rich White Men in the California and Oregon Legislatures, just as the Southern Slaves had to submit themselves to the whims of their Miscreant White Owners, Criminals all. And Rich White Men Politicians can include Blacks and Latinos, to their shame, as they vote to hold down those that share their cultural background and knowledge.

But the minimum wage law does not just crucify Black Youth disproportionally, it also cruelly victimizes two other groups in society: the small business man and the consumer on a fixed income, such as a government pension.

The small business man, better known as a Capitalist, is now forced to either make less profit, which will mean the end of his business if he was just scraping by before the minimum wage rise, or to put up the price of his goods to cover the wage cost increase, since it is generally estimated that labor costs constitute roughly 70% of the final cost of a product. This, in turn, causes more inflation in society, and inflation is what brings about social chaos and Fascism. The Democrats, so ignorant of economics, are bringing about the rise of the Nazis with their minimum wage increases.

The final group to be crucified by the Democrat’s minimum wage hike are the millions in these two States on fixed incomes, who can barely keep up with the tripleing and quadrupleing of the cost of their basic necessities that the Democrat’s inflation (with much help from the FED and Quisling-Republicans) has engineered in the last seven years. Now that the minimum wage has tragically hit $10, fresh accelerations in inflation will be forthcoming, and many elderly will die as they cut back on food and heat. But don’t expect the Democratic legislators and Governors to be charged with their murder, or to attend their funerals. Just like the lives of the Young Black Men which have been ruined by this law, just like the lives of the White teenagers that have been derailed by this law, just like the lives of the many Free-Market Capitalist small Businessmen who will have to shut their doors, or never open them in the first place, and just like the lives of the elderly Democratic pensioner, whose lifetime pension has just been significantly reduced in its purchasing power by inflation, — just like all these groups, the deaths of the elderly from self-neglect will not be reported in the press.  And just like these four groups that suffer such damage from this malevolent law, so too will this Fascistic, inflationary, Government intrusion into the Free Market for Labor hurt you, as you pay through the nose for every little service. These Miscreants have destroyed the value of the Dollar, and vomited on the ideas of Saving and Frugality.

California and Oregon Democrats —- you wanted inflation and unemployment and you’re going to get it. Enjoy your poverty, Fascists!

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Is it Constitutional in America to Discriminate in a Business? An Internal Debate

August 5, 2013

Silverwolf cleared the decks of his internal Parliament, and presented to the tabula rasa MP’s the following question: Should it be legal and is it constitutional to discriminate, on whatever basis one wishes, in one’s business in America? For example, should it be legal for an American Citizen, of Turkish cultural background and ethnicity, to refuse to sell to American-Armenians, or not let them in his store, which is open otherwise to the general public?

Obviously, this was one of the key questions and objections in the Civil Rights Act of 1963, Few doubted that picketing in protest outside of a business was a legitimate exercise of Free Speech Rights as long as the thoroughfare was kept open to the flow of pedestrians, but was it legal to enter the premises and then sit-in, in effect crippling the owners ability to do business?

This was the question that tormented Silverwolf through the long, stormy, frigid nights of the winter of ’11. Tossing and turning in his wolf’s lair, Silverwolf debated with himself this key issue which is so weighty for American jurisprudence and political theory.

First off, if I can discriminate in whom I let into my private residence, why should I not be able to discriminate in whom I let into my business premises? The meateater, the Nazi, the hunter, the fisherman, the vivisectionist, and the Stalinist all pay taxes, but if I choose not to let them into my private residence or property, nobody cries foul or racial discrimination. So why should it be different for a business?

I put this question to the late Blue Dog, a bluedog Democrat. His snap answer was that businesses were there to serve the public.

Silverwolf chewed this over, but it seemed a little idealistic to him after a few hours mulling. Come on, businesses ain’t there to serve the public; they’re there to make a profit for the owners and stockowners, and they wouldn’t start it if they didn’t think they would materially gain from it (unless they were a Good Samaritan starting the business solely to serve the public, with no interest in any profits over and above those necessary for a rude self-maintenance — not your typical business owner in America). The businessmen’s interest in profit, to further their personal pleasures, was no different than my interest in my own personal pleasure in keeping the meateater, the hunter, and the Nazi out of my desmesne, even though the meateater, hunter and Nazi might all pay taxes that pay for police and fire protection that benefits me and my property, and from which they are excluded. If it’s fair for me to exclude them from my Residential Property, why is it unfair, and even immoral, for them to deny me access to their business property, simply because I’m a wolf?

This really puzzled Silverwolf, and he recalled that Senator Barry Goldwater had objected to the Civil Rights Act precisely on this point of business owners being able to have property rights over their business premises.

Then Silverwolf argued with himself against this business discrimination with the following argument: the business district in town in limited to a certain area; if businesses were allowed to discriminate, it would be possible for a block of racist business owners to effectively exclude everyone in an area from vital necessities and services which would, de facto, force them to leave the area. For example, if all the hardware stores and food stores in the business district of a rural town were owned almost exclusively by a group of White racists, they could in effect make it impossible for all the Black people in an area to obtain the food and building materials they would need to survive in that area, and no new Black entrepreneurs could come into the market because the White racists held a virtual monopoly on all the available business licences and rentals.

Now this problem bifurcates into two problems for the Libertarian, for his reply might be that zoning laws are anti-Capitalist restrictions on Free-Market activity, and in a Libertarian society one could set up a business wherever one deemed fit. This would in effect end the monopoly on business licences that occurs when a business district is created, and business permits are required to conduct trade, that blatantly Communist restriction on Capitalism which has been so miserably tolerated for so long in America. This ending of business zoning would mean that would-be Black entrepreneurs could set up shop wherever they willed, and the racist monopoly over business licences and premises would be smashed.

But here we come to another problem in the road. So far, we have only discussed discrimination in those businesses which front onto public thoroughfares, and let’s assume for the moment that such discrimination is illegal exactly because these businesses, due to their location, can be called public businesses which have a moral duty under some undefined natural law to serve all customers, regardless of race, religion or creed. But what if we postulate a business that does not front onto a public thoroughfare, a business which was contained completely within the property of a private landowner? Should the owner of such a business be free to discriminate on the basis of race or religion?

For example, say a Korean Supremacist opens a business on a 40 acre parcel of land he is fortunate enough to own in the midst of a major downtown metropolis. The parcel is divided into two 20 acre parcels. He operates a public business that faces onto the public street in which he does not discriminate, located on the front 20 acres, But on the back 20 acres, which at no point border public property, he creates a 5 acre business zone, enclosed entirely by the private 20 acres, to which he will only permit admittance to those he regards as racially pure Koreans, who share his Korean-Supremacist views. No Whites or non-Koreans or “Whitey-lover” Koreans are allowed in this complex of stores, and the stores only accept Korean Won in payment. Is such a store illegal under the 1963 Civil Rights Act?

At this point, a great Rothbardian White Light seemed to blind Silverwolf, although he had his eyes closed to give his eyelid muscles their usual afternoon nap. He suddenly saw the solution to his dilemma, but it proved not to be final.

The solution was actually very simple. What does it say on the money? A Federal Reserve note, legal tender for all debts, public and private. It was herein that the solution lay.

If a Federal Reserve Note is legal tender and a store owner on a public street (or in a public announcement like a newspaper ad) advertises something for sale in his storefront window, then the asking price of that good or service becomes a private debt publicly advertised, and any person with the requisite amount of federal reserve notes should be able to satisfy that private debt and obtain the good or service touted. In other words, offering something for sale in terms of Federal Reserve Notes requires that you accept those notes from anyone who offers them if the private debt was publicly advertised. Not to do so would violate the contractual conditions printed on the money.

So the real reason why it is illegal to discriminate on business properties but not on private residence properties is because the Federal Reserve Note is legal tender for all debts, public and private, and anyone in America who has these notes has a right to exchange them for any publicly advertised private debt.

However, what would happen if we had precious metal coinage, as is stipulated by the U.S. Constitution? Since this coinage would not be a Federal Reserve Note, (and the Federal Reserve itself would hopefully not exist at that point) then it seems to us that the argument we made above, for non-discrimination when it comes to the use of Federal Reserve Notes, might no longer be valid. And the same problem might arise if the store only displayed its prices in foreign currency or currencies, since these are not legal tender for all debts public and private in America.

So under current law, could business owners legally discriminate against customers if they only accepted gold and silver (and copper?) coins or foreign currency as payment for their wares?

This question remains unanswered, and Silverwolf is still as Libertarianly-puzzled as before. As to what the truth of the matter is, and if there is an unshakeable political reason why discriminating in one’s business premises is immoral, it remains unclear to him.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww—Silverwolf

Dennis Johnson: A Jew-Baiter in Oklahoma

April 26, 2013

Enboldened by the Democrat’s endorsement of Senator Hagel’s anti-Semitism, it didn’t take long for more cockroaches to come out of the woodwork.

In Oklahoma, legislator Dennis Johnson actually had the gaul to spread his racist dung not just off the cuff or in an private interview, but in the hallowed halls of the Oklahoma Legislature. Here, in this publicly-supported meeting-place of the People, Johnson slandered a whole segment of the taxpaying population by vomiting forth the old Nazi canard that goes back to the Middle Ages. The Racist Johnson, perhaps emboldened by the confirmation of Senator Hagel by the Liberals, knew he could get away with spewing his Jew-baiting filth in public, and his sarcastic “apology” which even went “to the Jews” instead of “to Jews”, as if they were a monolithic block instead of individuals, showed most blatantly his ingrained Racism,while the couple of grinning hyenas sitting behind Johnson, seemed to think the Jew-baiting Slander was very funny.

Perhaps they think it’s funny because they’re not one of the million children murdered by the Nazis in the Holocaust, which is the end result of such Slander as Johnson’s. Perhaps they wouldn’t think it so funny if they were being burned to death because of Racist comments like Johnson’s. But they’re not, so these Hyenas can laugh it off. What Trashbags these legislators are!

Remember that the end goal of all Racists is the murder of little kids and old women.

And did you notice what an obese “chazzer” Johnson is? It’s obvious that when it comes to greed, Johnson is greedy about food. So it’s not surprising that he slanders other people with his own very obvious vice. Obese people are taking the food out of the mouths of little children, driving up the cost of food for the world’s poor, and starving some kid to death in the third world, so it’s not surprising that they wouldn’t mind trying to whip up hatred and divide Americans against each other by promoting Racism, a false doctrine that has murdered tens of millions of people throughout history.

The Libertarian is an anti-Racist in the sense that he has no group image about others: he sees each man as an Individual, with Natural Law, or God-given, Rights, and knows that the prejudiced man, the man who “pre-judges” his fellow man on the basis of some bias, whether through racist propaganda or real life encounters with someone of that ethnic group or a combination of these two, — such a pre-judger is a stupid man, a boring man; a man whose mind moves in a few fixed catagories.

Have you even noticed how Racists are usually the dullest people?

Now, one supposes that in theory it is possible for someone to be a Libertarian, believing that all men have Natural Rights, but also believe that all members of some specific ethnic group are all one way or another, or are all bad, but it seems highly unlikely in a Libertarian. And even more unlikely if you consider the broad ethnic makeup of leading Libertarian thinkers, from Murray Rothbard and Ayn Rand to Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. You couldn’t read much Libertarian literature if you were a bigot, because so much of its writings were and are done by so-called minority group members — minority group members to those that think in terms of groups, but only fellow citizens with equal Rights in the view of Libertarians.

And Libertarians are anti-Racists  in the sense that they will tolerate no special privileges for special groups at the expense of the Rights of everyone not in those groups, or at the expense of some other specified group. This prevents the creation of Racist laws.

One of the most difficult and most important actions in life is not to create images in the mind, either images of ones closest relatives or acquaintances or images of whole groups of people. Or even images of oneself. People, like the Cosmos, are always in flux and creating their own destinies. They are Action, not fixed Substance. And both Libertarianism and Existentialism, that wonderful Philosophy from the 50s and 60s which fully agrees with Libertarianism that one is completely responsible for ones actions and must bear that responsibility oneself — both these doctrines look solely at people’s actions, not some pre-judged image of people.

Libertarians should target such Racist Trash as Dennis Johnson for unelection, and vote such Miscreants out at the next opportunity. America should have no truck with Racists, especially in our Legislatures and National Cabinet. Let them go back to Europe and Russia, where they’ll be right at home.

And if Silverwolf ever has a store, he sure hopes Dennis Johnson doesn’t come in and try to buy something. Johnson might try to “Goy me down on the price.”

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf