Posts Tagged ‘chemical weapons’

Obama Finally Gets One Right: The Syrian Massacre

September 11, 2013

As one who has ripped the President, rhetorically speaking, since his inception in office, it gives Silverwolf great pleasure to finally agree almost wholeheartedly with the President, and to stand against the majority of his erstwhile Libertarian and Ron Paul-Republican colleagues in their opinions.

For the first time in history, Silverwolf watched a complete Obama speech from beginning to end, for up to this point it had been a question, after three or four minutes of watching or listening, as to whether Silverwolf could reach the door in time to not regurgitate his vegan muck all over the new Axminster.

But tonight Silverwolf listened to Obama, because for once their views were almost congruent. Silverwolf had called for a blasting of the Syrian War Criminal Assad and his top entourage for a long time before the President finally came to the same proposal, and a meally-mouthed proposal at that — targeted strikes against the chemical weapons stashes only — but never a serious attempt to obliterate that gang of terrorists known as the Syrian Government of Child-Murderer Assad by hitting Assad himself.

However, the Ron Paul-Ted Cruz wing was absolutely right in saying that the President could not go to war without the approval of Congress, but only Ron Paul and Son have pointed out the valid point that the drone strikes against various terrorist group leaders in Pakistan and Yemen are equally an act of war. If Republicans and Democrats support those drone strikes, then it follows that they should also support attacks against military and government targets of the Assad Gang of Terrorists.

Silverwolf first took President Obama’s proposal for the complete removal of Assad’s chemical weaons as a namby-pamby backdown in the face of the initial understandably negative reaction of public opinion to the proposal. But after hearing his speech, he now thinks it may be a very clever way of eventually getting to a justification, in the eyes of the American public, for an attack on the Fascist Criminal Assad, for when Assad refuses to comply, as he undoubtedly will, and since it is virtually impossible to ascertain that all chemical weapons are removed from a country as large as Syrian, then the public will feel that Assad has been given a reasonable out by a President very reluctant to use force, and very non-vindictive in tone in his speech. Indeed, the President seemed to speak tonight in terms of the sorrow inflicted by these sadistic callous brutes, rather than in anger at War Crimes that cause Silverwolf to bare his fangs, salivate profusely, and growl.  In other words, this proposal may be the President’s very cleverly crafted mode of finally getting public and congressional approval for this very necessary attack — necessary as a deterrent to any further chemical attacks from any of the Miscreant Dictators that are a curse on the people of the Earth. Every murdering one of them ought to be in chains for life, condemned to the most tediously dull labour for their daily plate of gruel and beans, or given the Freedom of Choice to starve themselves to death.

Obama may not have Constitutional authority for this attack, at least currently, but his speech put out to the People the Moral necessity of this deterrent strike very well. It is exactly the same situation, morally speaking, as Rwanda and Sarajevo, Clinton’s War Crimes of Inaction, and the Sharpville Massacre, as well as being, on a smaller scale, the exact same crime as the gassings of troops in World War I and the gassing of civilians in the Holocaust, or the napalming of Vietnamese Women and Children by the War Criminals in the U.S. military of that day, and the War Criminals in War Criminal Lyndon Johnson’s lying administration.

The War Criminal Assad’s War Crime of gassing women and children must not go unpunished; Obama is dead right on this one. For the first time, Silverwolf feels like calling him “Mr. President”.

Mr. President and Congress, please bomb the hell out of that Fascist Child-Murderer Assad! Child-murderers, tremble!

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Advertisements

Missile Attack on Syria vs. Drone Strikes: What’s the Difference?

September 8, 2013

It’s interesting to see the reactions of the lemmings of the Democratic Party’s Anti-War Wing, now in action to stop Obama’s retaliation against the Mass Murderer and War Criminal Assad. Every few weeks, for the past few years under Obama, the press has reported drone strikes on Islamic radicals in al-Quaeda and various other groups, and there has been far more criticism of these as a vapid, immoral, and stupid policy from the Ron Paul-Libertarian wing of the Republican Party than from any Democrats. But now that Obama is going to take the very same action against a vicious head of a Nazi-like regime, many Democrats, as well as that Repulican-Libertarian wing, are up in arms.

But how do these two actions — a missile strike on a mass murderer and his military and drone strikes on mass murderers and the heads of their militias — how do they fundamentally differ? It seems to me not very much, except that by constantly killing innocent civilians along with the guilty jihadists in these drone strikes, Obama creates a fresh huge wave of cannon-fodder recruits for the radicals. In a raid on Assad’s military, or Assad himself, probably only guilty war criminals and their assistants would suffer.

Silverwolf’s brand of Libertarianism — and we think it was Jefferson’s too — wants those Jeffersonian inalienable Natural Human Rights to extend to every single Human Being on Earth, not just in America and Western Europe. And when we see such egregious mass murder and war crimes being carried out with impunity, it seems to us that the Western Powers, with the most powerful military in the world, have some sort of moral obligation to intervene to stop the carnage and kill the Nazi. Using the use of chemical weapons as an excuse for smashing a murdering Fascist, as if all the other weapons from incendiary bombs to napalm to land mines wasn’t excuse enough, is fine with Silverwolf. Hitting the Syrian military with missile strikes is no different from the frequent hitting of Jihadists in Pakistan, and no rank-and-file Democrats or Republicans are making a big issue of that except a few like Senator Paul, although we have made an issue of it because of its murder of innocent civilians along with the guilty. So it just goes to show how hypocritical is the Democrat’s and Republican’s current opposition to missile strikes against Syria. It may be unconstitutional to hit Syria without Congressional approval, but just as unconstitutional as Obama’s frequent drone attacks, which none of these same puling politicians on Syria whine about.

So Silverwolf disagrees with most of his fellow Libertarians on this issue

Obama is right for once. Smash any Fascist who uses chemical weapons!

Hoooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Inaction on Syria: Murder Under Your Feet

September 3, 2013

Spend a day in the American wilderness with the sun shining, and you’d think you’d been parachuted into heaven, unless you’re broken down, lost, and thirsty without water, in which case you might feel like you’ve been dropped somewhere else, — but precluding such emergencies, you might think you’d been given a day in paradise.

But look down to your feet. Down there, underneath the soil several thousand miles, there are people being murdered.

The British Parliamentary Left’s response to Assad’s War Crimes in Syria is disgusting. What they have done is like voting to not bomb the rail lines to the Nazi concentration camps “because they didn’t want to get involved”.

And here we must differ strongly with our political hero, Ron Paul, and the entourage around him, who oppose military action in Syria. The excuse that we will be helping Al-Quaeda or the Jihadists in the opposition forces if we hit Assad’s military, (and why not hit Assad himself?) is a thin one indeed, for if there are clearly identifiable units and militias in the opposition forces that are al-Quaeda, then does not America, or at least the Obama Administration, have a policy of hitting those groups with drones? And if they can be so identified, then should these groups not also be subject to the same treatment as Obama has used on radicals in Pakistan and Yemen, creating multitudes of new radicals as he goes by killing innocent bystanders and relatives of these radicals — far more radicals than he is killing? A stupid policy from a stupid President.

Silverwolf agrees in theory with Ron Paul that we do not need, and should not have, roughly 700 military bases around the world. Let the rich Euros and Nipponese pay for them, not the American small Capitalist. But since we violate this principle every day with NATO, and with our drone strikes on militants, then why not use our military to send a very powerful deterrent message to one of the world’s worst current War Criminals. Any military action against such a bestial Nazi is a plus for world Libertarianism, in our opinion.

It seems to us that Jeffersonian Libertarianism or Classical Liberalism has this in common with Communism and Jihadist Islam — that it seeks to establish its moral code around the world. Communism and Fanatical Organized Religion both have their need to establish their tyranny over the entire globe, or see themselves fail and self-immolate. But Libertarianism, based on the Natural Rights theory that all Human Beings have Inalienable Rights and that the true function of government is merely to guarantee and protect those Rights, prosecuting those who would violate them, — Libertarianism too has its need to spread around the globe, and become the norm for Mankind wherever he goes on the Planet. You can’t just have Libertarianism in America, and say, to hell with the 8000 dowery murders per year in India, or the thousands of executions in Red China. Here we very strongly disagree with Ron Paul’s seeming to isolate these Rights to within the borders of the United States, and to not much care about the Natural Rights violations that are going on around the globe daily. Ron Paul and his entourage are right, however, in being extremely cautious about using the military outside of America, and at the drop of a hat. Throughout history, governments have used moral arguments to get into wars for which they really had economic and sinister motives. This is true most of the time. But now that we can specifically target War Criminals and their Militaries, as in Syria and North Korea, with highly accurate missiles, Silverwolf is not going to protest any more than he’d protest every day against the presence of US bases in Europe or Japan.

And as for that Stinking British Labour Party, and George Galloway, MP, — what a bunch of self-centred collaborators with Hitlerism.

Hoooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf