Posts Tagged ‘Human Rights’

Silverwolf’s Jeffersonian Epistle to the Fascist, President Obama

June 10, 2012

In light of the Hitlerian NDAA Bill, signed by the President on December 31, 2011, a day that will live in Infamy, which allows the US Military to arrest and secretly detain in military prisons for an indefinite period any US Citizen without benefit of a lawyer, and in light of the President’s claimed authority to assassinate American Citizens at will on a White House “Kill List”, and in the light of the President’s Murder of another 18 women and children in a NATO air strike in Pakistan, and in light of all the other Human Beings he has Murdered and permanently maimed in his immoral drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen, and in light of the President’s denying to the terminally ill in those States which have legalized medical cannabis the use of that medication, which in itself is another form of premeditated Murder, Silverwolf addresses the following Jeffersonian epistle to the President:


No longer persevere in sacrificing the Rights of One Individual to the inordinate desires of the Executive Branch, but deal out to all equal and impartial Right.

Let no act be passed by Executive Order that may infringe on the Rights and Liberties of the Individual, but deal out to all equal and impartial Right.

These are our grievences, which we have thus laid before Your Majesty with that freedom of language and sentiment which becomes a free people, claiming their Rights derived from the Laws of Nature, and not as the gift of their chief executive.

Let those flatter who fear. It is not an American art.

Presidents are the servants, not the proprietors of the People. Open your breast, Sire, to Libertarian and expanded thought. Let not the name of Barack Obama be a blot on the page of History. It behooves you  to think and act for yourself and your People. The whole Art of Government consists in the art of being Honest.

We are willing, on our part, to sacrifice everything which Reason can ask to restore tranquillity. On your part, be willing to restore the Bill of Rights on a generous plan.

The G-d who gave us Life, gave us Liberty. The hand of Force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.

This, Sire, is our last, our determined resolution: To vote you out of office.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

America’s Day of Infamy: The Administration Welcomes a Dictator

January 19, 2011

American Libertarians can only hang their heads in shame, as they see the highest representatives of a government they didn’t vote for greet the head of the world’s largest dictatorship. It is a black spot indeed on the national honor, and we should not forget that it is “Liberal Democrats”, people who supposedly hold the rights of the little guy and the working man as sacrosanct, and who consistently market themselves as moral, principled people, who are the exact ones who are greeting the Dictator, and thus legitimizing and enabling the continuation of one of the world’s most despicable dictatorships. Murder, torture, religious prosecution, horrible exploitation of both workers and animals, kangaroo capital punishment courts, sale of body parts for profit: the list of crimes committed by the Red Chinese government gangsters is legion. How many innocent people and young soldiers did they kill in their wars against Vietnam and India?; how many Tibetan priests did they murder and torture? And have they ever been forced to return the booty they have looted in Tibet?

None of these issues seemed to deter the immoral triumvirate of Obama, Biden, and Clinton, from welcoming the head of this gangster regime to Washington, and forcing moral Americans to have to waste their taxpayer dollars in the purchase of Chinese flags, red carpet treatment, and elaborate dinners for the head of the torture gang.

Yet one does not see thousands of Liberal Democrats in the streets of our major cities, protesting against this crime against the spirit of the U.S. Constitution, and everything that Jeffersonian Republicanism stands for: due process of law, and the inalienable Rights of the Individual to be free of state tyranny, the exact antithesis of that State which Obama and Biden have legitimized on this Black Day for America.

During the mid-30s, Hitler’s greatest fear was that a boycott or embargo could have been passed by Congress which would have cut off American investment and contact with Nazi Germany. No boycott was instigated; America went to the Munich Olympics in 1936, thus legitimizing a torturing regime that engaged in religious persecution just as Red China does. And the rest is history.

Silverwolf would put it to you that America should treat Red China just as it should have treated Nazi Germany during the 30s, by a complete boycott and cutting off of all government recognition, a repudiation of all U.S. Government Bonds held by the Red Chinese regime, and withdrawal of immoral Most Favored Nation trading status granted to China, instigated under the Clinton Administration.

American and Jeffersonian Political Ideals are not just some toilet paper to be used to wipe up the scat of Fascism. In welcoming the Miscreant Criminal Hu, the Obama Administration has reduced those Ideals to such a state.

And Jefferson is cursing in his grave.

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

A Rotten Libertarian Sandwich

October 9, 2009

If one thinks of the politics of Principle as taking a straited path twixt the complete socialism of Communism, and the racist, corporate-state socialist, pseudo-capitalism of Fascism, then one can see why Silverwolf can think of politics as a rotten Libertarian sandwich, with the healthy political and economic truths of Praxeology interlarded between the twin slices of rotten despotism. Libertarianism has been tainted on the left by trying to associate it with Fascism or Nazism, the “far-right”, but this is an outrageous contamination by association of terms. The “old right” might be characterized by Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Burke, and Lord Acton. And since these old Liberals thought in terms of the “Rights of Man” these Rights appertained to every single Human Being irregardless, in that quaint American phrase from the 50s, of “race, color, or creed”.  Libertarianism is a form of Humanism in that it says that certain Rights belong to all men, including the Right of Self-ownership, which precludes slavery. A Libertarian would probably say that a man has a right to kill someone who tries to actually physically enslave him. Slavery represents the ultimate in theft of property rights, save for murder. Spartacus’ rebellion against the Roman Miscreants would probably garner applause from a Rothbard or Mises. Probably with Camus also, who refused to be ideologically forced into the left.

And Libertarianism has been tainted on the right by the charges of the ignorant that it stood for “libertinism”, or was the hangout of potheads who just wanted to get it legalized, or of gun nuts of the Far-Right and the Klan, who just wanted to hang on to their personal arsenals. ” (gutteral) chhHippies of the (gutteral) chhRight” Ayn Rand would once describe the Libertarians in her thick Russian accent. And the concept of a bunch of intellectual crackpots, who hold an annual convention every four years, and run a weird candidate, who just ekes out the Green Party candidate, and so retains the Libertarian’s claim on the third biggest party in America, has stuck with the public. Ron Paul’s 1-2% popularity status for quite a few months in the early presidential campaign, before he got up to the 15-20% scores later on,  might be because of the public’s vague memory that he once ran for the post as a Libertarian. The idea that this party essentially espouses the Thomas Jefferson line on government is completely missed by the general public.

And, also,  Libertarianism is a Humanism in its Ghandiesque insistence that no one has the right to use aggression, or initiate force, against another’s property rights. This non-aggression principle is another key element of Libertarianism that makes it completely incompatible with either Communism or Nazism. And because it believes in the non-aggression principle, and because it can see objectively from the ever-recurring course of history that State Power has been historically the most coercive force, it sees clearly the necessity for a minimalist government, non-intrusive in our privacy, which is faithfully committed to protecting the Rights of the Individual, and vigorously pursues prosecution of any malefactor who dares to violate the non-aggression principle.

And finally, Libertarianism is a Humanism because it places the Individual, and not the State, at the apogee of its value system. The Rights and the life of the Individual are the sacred goals to which Libertarianism marries itself, not the worship of a State, a flag, a religion, or a “leader”. In a world which does the exact opposite, be it in America, totalitarian China, Fascist Saudi, or Islamofascist Sudan, the Libertarian principle is the only one that maintains the integrity of the Individual. The world wants to crush the Individual; look at the tax laws written by the State worshippers, which are designed to crush any Individual economic power, no matter how hard one works and saves. And by crushing the Individual, the major countries of the world will kill the very engine that provides the wealth for all these looters. That is the process that is continuing apace throughout the world, as Communism and Fascism, the two rotten pieces of bread, mew up the healthy core of Human Freedom between their stench-filled slices.

In a world that says throw away the filling and just eat the rotten bread, Libertarians may well respond, “Fascisti, you can keep your bread, while we will feast on Human Freedom.”

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf