Posts Tagged ‘Iranian regime’

Iran Murders Another Blogger: The Price of Western Recognition

November 26, 2012

Taking advantage of its recognized legitimacy, thanks to the United Nations and Barack Obama, the Iranian criminal Regime the other day tortured another blogger to death, a 35-year old man. One could give his name, but perhaps that is unimportant when compared to the enormity of the crime. Once again the Gang of Murderers in Tehran, known as the Iranian Government, has commited the ultimate crime against Libertarianism, and all that Jefferson, Paine, and Washington fought for when they made their Libertarian Revolution in America, be it far from perfect. The war between King George III, Louis the 14th, Hitler Mao and Stalin, and Thomas Jefferson and Tom Paine’s “Rights of Man”, is still being won by the Thuggees of History, as witnessed by this latest Iranian atrocity.

The West is as rotten as the East in its collaboration with dictatorships around the world. America, and the American Presidency, with its awesomely immense power, has the ability to reform and bring down Hitlerian regimes around the world merely with its economic might. But it does nothing. And the power of the bully pulpit of the Presidency, which still seems to have some meaning to peoples living in abject misery around the world, is never used to overthrow Fascist Regimes merely by withdrawing commerce and political recognition. On the contrary, Obama collaborates with the Red Chinese Totalitarians, and talks of respect for Iran when the so-called government there murders demostrators by the hundreds, tortures thousands, and will even murder a blogger for the “crime” of Free Speech. Would that the American Revolutionaries could have gotten their hands on Ahmedinejad!

The sick so-called Libertarians who defend Iran, and accuse anyone who points out its Fascist Human Rights violations as a war-monger, are beyond contempt. They have no idea that a crime is commited anywhere on Earth when Government or the police violate the American Bill of Rights, the Fruit of the Womb of Jefferson’s mind. That is a crime against all Libertarians, for, as Frank Chodorov believed, Libertarianism is based on Natural Law, something in our consciences that tells us that to all chip in with our ideas and civilly listen to each other is ok, but to torture someone to death simply because they have a different view that ours is not. Natural Law is obvious moral law that we recognize in ourselves and others, and applies to every Human Being. When Governments violate those laws, those Governments become immoral, and when a Moral Government collaborates with an Immoral Government, as Barack Obama’s Democratic Administration has done for the last four years, then that collaborating government, which was morally brought about through democratic elections, becomes itself Immoral.

We define anyone that defends the Gang that is in control of the Iranian government as Morally Putrid, as well as any government that collaborates with it.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

The Iranian Government: A Euphemism for Women-Murderers

September 7, 2010

Well, it seems the women-murderers of Iran are out to get their necrophiliac jollys again, as they prepare to satisfy their bloodlust by stoning another woman to death for the crime of Love. This gang of sexless, crazed perverts, better known as the Iranian Regime, who have hanged so many young boys and girls, and stoned to death so many women for things which in the free West are no crime, once again need the fix of terrorizing, torturing, and murdering a forty-three year old woman, all in the name of Islam.

And the latest victim’s name is Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani. This woman committed the “crime” of having “illicit sex” with a man; a crime which an amazing percentage of the married people in the West commit, yet who are not stoned to death by, say, the governments of England, the U.S. or France.

But when you have an established religion-government, all throughout history, you have unspeakable horrors and murder, and Iran is a prime example of why Thomas Jefferson was so adamant in insisting on a “wall of separation of church and state”. He might have added “mosque and state” too.

We can also see in the murder-by-government in Iran exactly why the State should never be given the power to execute an Individual. These atrocities against women could never be carried out in a secular state that eschewed Capital Punishment. (Capital punishment should only be reserved for War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, as well as for the Government Officials who carried out those crimes, tried not as individuals, but as the Government-in-Power. And even then, it would be better to put them in a “War Criminal Zoo” in cages, feed them on a diet of gruel and boiled nettles, and let the public come and throw offal at them for the rest of their lives.)

And where is the Islamic world’s voice of protest at these murders? Well, what did you expect, Compassion? Silence means consent.

Libertarian Capitalists have only one weapon outside of force against such vile wickedness, i.e. the suspension of trade. All “decent” nations in the West should boycott the hell out of Iran until the current Gang of Murderers, known as the Iranian Government, is in the dock at Nuremberg. And this must be done despite the fact that the “Gaza-caring” country of Turkey, along with that lover of human rights, that man of the people, that champion of equal rights for women, that voice for union worker rights, that lover of decency for the poor, Lula, and his Brazil,  all voted in the UN not to impose sanctions on this Criminal Regime, this Gang of Woman Murderers. What wonderful countries are Brazil and Turkey! What lovers of Human Rights! What bullscat!

Perhaps the fate of the Iranian Regime should match what these Murderers do to women and young boys, so the West can see the bloody reality and the exposed brains of what they have been tolerating for far too long, because the Western governments and cultures are full of money-grubbing wimps who care not a jot for Morality or Principle, and who continue to trade with these Miscreants because it fattens their wallets, while they bury their heads in amusements.

The next time Ahmedinajad comes to New York to speak to the Un-united Nations, he should be arrested by an American citizens group for Crimes Against Humanity, and tried for Murder. And maybe some of those liberated NY Women should consider doing the same thing for his Crimes Against Women. Or are they more concerned with the latest gallery opening, or the current market price of their condos?

The Iranian murdering scumbags have already lashed this beautiful woman 99 times as part of her sentence. She has been on Death Row for over three years. Whether she will be buried up to her neck and have large stones thrown at her head until she is dead, is really up to the rest of the world. And you.

One day the members of this Gang of Murderers will rot in jail, Silverwolf predicts, unless their own people don’t “Mussolini” them first. Silverwolf will gladly settle for either.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

The Child-Murderers of Iran: Time to Arrest Ahmadinejad

May 6, 2009

“Another day, another hanging,” as they say in Teheran. Unfortunately, this has recently been the case for a twenty-three year-old  Iranian girl, Delara Darabi, who, when seventeen, was convicted of murder of a relative during a robbery. The girl later claimed that she had confessed to save her boyfriend who was over eighteen, since being under eighteen at the time, she thought as a juvenile she could not be executed according to the UN Treaty banning such juvenile executions. However, despite the fact her lawyer was not informed of the execution, as was required by Iranian law, and the fact that the local judiciary had given her a stay of execution of a month, she was dragged out and murdered by the Iranian regime last Friday, having been denied a final meeting with her parents. This girl was on death row for three years.

So Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his ruling clique of Mullahs have got their sexually-frustrated jollies out once again by terrorizing and hanging another child. Not satisfied with hanging 16-year old Atefah Sahaaleh three years ago for “crimes against chastity”, and numerous gay teenagers since then, and currently with 135 juveniles on death row, they must enter further into the perverse evil of hanging children, by continuing to practice their depravity.  But the death penalty makes any society callous, and so it should come as no surprise that Iran has hung an additional 139 human beings since the first of this year, two of them under 18 at the time of their judicial murder. These perverted Miscreants are setting a pace that even George Bush and his Texas Judiciary would have been envious of, for it took George a good number of years to run his total over a hundred. But life is full of frustrations, isn’t it?

Of course, much of the reason behind the criminal Iranian Reich’s ability to wage this war of Terror via the death penalty is the greenlight they have been given by the European Union’s mollycoddling of Iran, the so-called Progressive Left’s literal kiss of approval in the form of the racist and Socialist, Hugo Chavez, and the UN’s legitimization of the Iranian regime by issuing an invitation to the Criminal Ahmadinejad to address the pro-racist Anti-Racism Conference known as Durban II. The disgusting vision of Hans-Rudolf Metz, the head of the Swiss Confederation, a supposedly progressive country, giving the old Jimmy Carter grin to Ahmadinejad, the child-murderer, was a repulsive sight that Silverwolf will not soon forget. Time to short the Swiss Franc?

Capital Punishment is the final tyranny of the State, the power of life and death over the Individual. While it may seem, and may well be. an appropriate punishment for War Crimes,  yet for crimes within the State, the usual crimes for which the death penalty is put forth, Capital Punishment is nothing but a sadistic exercise carried out by the necrophiliacs amongst us. If you wanted to really punish someone, you could make them wash dishes 14 hours a day, 6 days a week, and keep them in solitary for life if they were incorrigibly violent or dangerous. without any amusements like television or radios. Such a punishment would be a far greater deterrent and much more feared by those nothings who commit  heinous crimes just to get lots of attention. And the profits from their labour could be divided between the public, in terms of wages repaid to pay for their prison incarceration, and wages repaid to the next of kin of those they have murdered, for their support. Such an arrangement seems far more just to Silverwolf. Why execute someone, when over the course of 40 or 50 years he could generate a quarter-million dollars of labour in addition to his prison costs? They owe that money to the children or next of kin of their victim, since that is at least what the victim could have generated in labor wages during that time frame.

But don’t try talking logic to sadists.

And now, as this blog is being written, Iran is preparing to hang two more juveniles, one 16 and one 17, Wednesday morning in Teheran,  in violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which bans the execution of juveniles who have committed their crimes before their eighteenth birthday. The Iranian Reich is violating that Convention, to which they are a signatory, and thus they have violated International Law.

Silverwolf believes that the next time Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sets down in any other country that is a signatory to that Convention of the Rights of the Child, he should be arrested for child-murder and tried by an International Tribunal in the Hague. And the punishment for child-murder should be perpetual life in solitary at hard labour. Let the Bastard rot in a jail cell for the rest of his earthly days!

The Silverwolves pray around the campfire that regimes like the Iranian Reich, that hang children, will be wiped from the face of the earth. May that day come soon.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Respect for Iran? Speak for Yourself, Mr. President

March 20, 2009

President Obama’s despicable call for “mutual respect” between the US and the Fascist government of Iran, coming on the heels of Mrs. Clinton’s legitimization of China’s illegal and genocidal occupation of Tibet, is another blot on the Human Rights record of America, and the Obama Administration.

When one remembers that the Iranian government is one that has hung countless teenagers for the “crime” of being Gay, when one remembers the millions of its youth who were slaughtered by the Islamic Regime during the War with Iraq, when one recalls the Buenos Aires bombing of the Jewish Center that murdered 85 people, and War Criminal Ahmadinejad’s warmongering call for Israel to be wiped off the map, one wonders how the President can call for “mutual respect” for such a gang of criminals?  But given that the President has belonged for 20 years to a congregation who gave its Man of the Year award to the racist, Catholic- and Jew- hater,  Louis Farrakhan, and which is led by a minister who has publicly said “God Damn America”, it’s easy to understand how the President can call for such “respect”.

Perhaps if the President’s daughters had been hung for engaging in Lesbian activities, he’d be less prone to call for respect for such a regime? Perhaps if his wife had died in the Buenos Aires bombing, carried out by Hezbollah with the aid of the Iranians, he’d be less inclined to mention “respect” for this gang of murderers? Perhaps if he’d been one of the parents of a soldier killed by an Iranian supplied IED in Iraq, he’d feel less inclined to offer “respect” to the murderers of his son or daughter? Perhaps, if he were a child living in Israel, he might feel some terror upon hearing that a man a few hundred miles away wanted to wipe him and his parents off the face of the earth, and might feel less moved to “respect” such a miscreant?

But perhaps he wouldn’t?

Hooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Israel, Iran’s Nuclear Threat, and Murray Rothbard’s Non-Aggression Principle

June 29, 2008

In light of the announcement, the other week, that Valerie Puta, the Puta of St. Petersburg, has sold Iran a new, sophisticated, Russian anti-aircraft missile system, which can take out several planes at one time, the gravity of the genocidal threats against the indigenous inhabitants of Israel by the Iranian government has taken on a fresh urgency. The child-murderer Ahmedinejad, whose Fascist regime has hung and tortured a girl of 16 for the “crime” of having sex with an unmarried man, in violation of International Law, and who has said that Israel should be wiped off the map, has provided all the justification, in Silverwolf’s eyes, for Israel to attack the nuclear facilities in Iran, as well as all government buildings housing the criminals of this criminal regime, according to the non-aggression principle expounded by the shining light of the Libertarian movement, the late Professor Murray Rothbard.

Rothbard’s Libertarian Creed, expounded in his “The Ethics of Liberty” as well as in other of his works, states simply that “No man or group of men may aggress against the person or property of anyone else.” Clearly, under this doctrine, the Iranian leadership’s threat to “wipe Israel off the map” is a form of genocidal aggression, as is its threat to retaliate against Jews and Jewish communities around the world. And this Islamo-Fascist regime’s involvement in the bombing of the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, in which roughly 100 Human Beings were murdered and maimed by the Iranians, shows that these are not empty threats.

Now, one of the precipitating considerations in Rothbard’s view as to whether to initiate defensive action against a man or group of men who threaten one’s person or property, is the immediacy of the threat. If my neighbour says, “Some day, if I ever have the money to buy a gun, which I don’t have now, I’m going to blow your head off”, (and which I don’t think he’ll ever have because every time he has a dollar in his pocket he rushes down to the nearest bar, and spends it on booze), Rothbard would say that I don’t have the right to shoot that man in the back when he turns around. If he says to me, “Next month, when I get my next paycheck, I’m going to buy a gun and blow your head off,” then the urgency of the situation may or may not justify my blowing his head off then and there. Rothbard is a little fuzzy on that. But when he says, “As soon as I get my gun, I’m going to blow your head off”, and he turns and heads towards his gun shed, then Rothbard’s Libertarian principle would seem to justify my blowing his head off first. That is not the crime of “backshooting”.

Now, in light of the statement only the other day by UN nuclear official El-Baradei, that Iran could have a nuclear weapon in 6-months, and in light of both the sale of the defense system by the Russian Puta to Iran, and the aforementioned Iranian threats, there is little doubt in Silverwolf’s mind that Israel not only has the right, under Libertarian doctrine, to strike at those facilities, and the Iranian government buildings housing the officials of this outlaw regime, but Israel also the moral duty to do so to save the lives of roughly 6 million Israelis (a third of whom are non-Jewish Arabs and foreign guest-workers), as well as the lives of Arabs in surrounding nations, who are downwind from the radioactive fallout. Silverwolf believes this would send a message, not only to Iran, but to the whole world, that countries, when threatened with genocide and mass murder, have every right to strike against those who are responsible for those threats. This will almost certainly prevent further genocides in the future, as well as definitely preventing the genocide which it is obvious Iran has planned for the Israeli nation.

One should remember that key members of the UN, including France, Russia, China, Canada, and the EU, have offered to permit, and even help, Iran to develop nuclear power for domestic peaceful purposes, if they were willing to remove the spent fuelrods to Russia, which sounds like a pretty reasonable plan to Silverwolf. But this rational approach has been rejected by the Iranian leadership, leading to the recent imposition of sanctions against Iran by the EU. It is very obvious what Iran wants: to wipe out the Jews.

Silverwolf can only imagine the reaction of America, if a group of Mexicans were continually firing missiles across the border into Arizona, California, and New Mexico, and claiming they were justified in doing so because of the Mexican-American War of the 1840’s. And he can only imagine what would be the reaction of the American government if, at the same time, the Mexican Government declared that they were going to “wipe America off the face of the map” while continuing to develop nuclear weapons and violating UN resolution after UN resolution concerning inspections in regard to the possibility of such weapons, to the extent that the rest of the Western world finally imposed sanctions on them. Would America sit around with its thumb up its ear and do nothing? Silverwolf doubts it. Yet, the clamorers of the hard-Left, who have nothing but criticism for Israeli policies towards the Arabs in the occupied-West bank (and many of which criticisms are valid), are completely silent or excusatory when it comes to Iran’s genocidal threats towards Israel, to Islamic Sudan’s Genocide in Darfur, to child-torture in Kenya as was revealed a few days ago, to mass rape in the Congo, to N. Korea’s gulags, to Russian torture in Chechnya, to the more than 50-year-long occupation and cultural genocide of Buddhist Tibet by Commie China, to Zimbabwe’s torturing miscreant Fascist rulers, to the persecution and murder of Coptic Christians under the Egyptians, to Malaysia’s persecution of Hindus and Tamils, to Castro’s jailing of dissidents, and on and on. Egypt just shot to death a seven-year old Sudanese girl trying to cross into Israel. The BBC didn’t report it. Wonder why?

Now, if tomorrow morning (and Silverwolf hopes it will happen) Ahmedinejad announced that Iran was renouncing its threat to destroy Israel, and not to retaliate against Jews around the world, and that it was willing to cooperate with the eminently reasonable proposals that have been put to it by the aforementioned UN members, then Israel would have no justification in immediately attacking Iran’s nuclear weapons program. But this is as unlikely as that tomorrow the whole world will become vegan and shut its millions of slaughterhouses for defenseless animals.

Israel must send a message to the world that genocide will not be tolerated. The bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities will save not only 6 million Human Beings, living in Israel, but countless millions in the future who will not suffer the Crime of Genocide, because Israel took action in the here and now. Mass murderers of the future will think twice about starting down this road of Evil, and may decide not to embark on it, if Israel acts today.

The longer Israel hesitates, the more dangerous becomes her situation. The time for talk and diplomacy is over. The time for action, precipitated by the Russian arms sales, has begun. Under Rothbard’s Libertarian doctrine, Israel would be completely justified in this action.

Silverwolf wonders if that 16-year old girl, Atefeh Rabaji, whom the Iranians dragged out and hung by  slowly hoisting her with a crane, on August 15, 2004, for the “crime”  of having sex, may have called on G-d to avenge her murder by destroying her murderers. It seems the Big Guy Upstairs may have heard her.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf