Posts Tagged ‘racism’

Arizona’s SB 1062: Here Come the Racists

February 25, 2014

Arizona’s SB 1062 is an unlawful, and probably unConstitutional, Racist attempt to overthrow the laws of the United States, which forbid discriminating in business based on race, color, creed, etc. and now so-called sexual orientation.

Now, Silverwolf discussed in detail in his blog, “Is It Constitutional in America to Discriminate in a Business?: An Internal Debate”, https://lobobreed.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/is-it-legal-in-america-to-discriminate-in-a-business-an-internal-debate/, whether it was Consitutional and/or legal to discriminate in business, and he went through an entire series of arguments and counter=arguments with himself, finally arriving at the conclusion that it was indeed illegal. Why?

It is illegal simply because businesses advertise their products priced in U.S. dollars, that is, Federal Reserve Notes. Now, it says on those notes that they are legal tender for all debts, public and private, and thus, if someone operates a business, and offers a good or service priced in U.S. dollars, then they must accept your legal tender note, since the government has promised you already that such a note is legal tender for any private debt, which is the price of the goods or service. Thus, the seller would be forced to accept these notes if he has offered goods or services to the public, either by being open for business, placing his prices in his windows or attached to the items in the store, or advertising them in the media. They are publicly offered debts, and in a real sense, that person has offered a contract to all comers that he will trade his good or service for their Federal Reserve Notes. To refuse to serve them would be to Violate a Contract, which is a Crime in both theoretical Libertarian doctrine and actual U.S. Law. This would be true even if the note was an old Silver or Gold Certificate note, backed by precious metal. (However, if the person paid in Silver or Gold Coinage, then they might well be able to discriminate, but that is another legal discussion, and here we are dealing solely with Federal Reserve Notes. But we’re certain, given the “dedication” and religous purity of these people who don’t want to do business with Gays, that if they were running a Restaurant that served $300 dinners, and a Gay wanted to purchase a dinner and pay his bill in $20 Gold pieces or Silver Dollars, that they would steadfastly refuse them service — that’s how religiously dedicated and pure they are.And we’re sure that if they suddenly needed emergency medical assistance and were rushed to a doctor, and the doctor was a Muslim, and refused on religious grounds to treat, or even touch, the sinful flesh of any non-Muslim, that they would understand, and respect his Religious Liberties, and die quickly.)

Now the so-called Conservative Group that is advocating this anti-Capitalist Law, the Center for Arizona Policy, states “SB 1062 seeks to ensure that state laws that violate the religious liberties of private persons cannot be enforced simply because the government is not technically a party to the case.”

But that “the government is not technically a party to the case” is precisely a big whopping Lie, as we have illustrated above. The Federal goverment is a party to the case, because it says on the Federal Reserve Note that the Federal government says this is a legal tender note that can be used to service any private debt anywhere in America, regardless of in what State, and the seller of the goods or service is refusing to accept what the Federal government has ordered him to accept if he is going to price his goods and services in U.S. Dollars. So the government is right in the midst of the trade, and is thus very clearly a party to the case. The contract they promised to the bearer was violated by the seller, and thus the seller must be punished under Law.

Now, if the seller could price his goods or services in, say, Swiss Francs or conch shells or ounces of tea, then perhaps the seller might be able to legally discriminate in his business, but this again is a different political theory question, and alternate currencies are viewed with askance by the U.S. Treasury and the government, although in a Libertarian Free-Market Society we should be able to price or purchase items in whatever currencies we, the buyer and seller, can agree on. If we think the Zimbabwean Shilling is sounder than the U.S. Dollar, then we should, in a Libertarian Society, be able to conduct our Free Market in whatever currency we choose. That would be a truly Free Market, and will come in the Future. But, here and now in America, if you price something in U.S. Dollars, and publicly advertise it, the buyer should be able to settle the debt in U.S. Dollars, whomever they are, and the government must guarantee that reality.

And finally, if your religous liberties make it impossible for you to conduct your business in America in Federal Reserve Notes, as under current law, then you’re always free to not start a business that will violate those liberties, and your always free to seek your living in some other manner, or starve to death. (Oh, we forgot, there are food stamps even for Racists, paid for by some poor Black working stiff.)

This Bill is nothing but a Communist-Racist attempt to instill that Ol’ Southern Segregation in the midst of Arizona.The Governor of Arizona should lob a big lunger of Libertarian Free Market Spit on this unAmerican Bill, and veto it.

If the Governor signs the Bill, all Free Market non-Racist Americans should use that grand old Irish Free-Market weapon: the Boycott, and Boycott Arizona. Don’t go there, and don’t buy their products.

If the Governor signs the Bill, then, as they used to say in the ghetto, “Boycott, Baby, Boycott!”

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

Advertisements

Ron Paul Self-Taints: Hanging Out with the Racists

September 27, 2013

Ron Paul’s recent speaking engagement at a fundraiser for a Holocaust-denying, renegade Catholic priest, who has been thrown out of the Church by the Vatican, combined with his nearly simultaneous interview of the anti-Semite, Julian Assange, on Paul’s web channel, have seriously damaged his credibility in this observer’s eyes, and makes us wonder if our long support of Ron Paul and his principles was mis-directed.

On the Principles for which he has argued, and they are the Jeffersonian Principles of Good Governance, the Natural Rights Liberty of the Individual, and the Free-Market, we have little disagreement.  After reading of the allegations against Ron Paul, many times seemingly blown up and repeated over and over by the liberal-left Democratic media without quoting the actual abuses, and given the economic value to the vested interests that benefit from all the abuses in America that Ron Paul has argued against over and over, — given these two factors, we thought. during his two campaigns, that Ron Paul was being unfairly smeared by the Democratic Left, But these old allegations. in combination with Ron Paul’s recent hobnobbing with two notorious Holocaust-denying Jew-haters, make us believe that they could well be true. Ron Paul may mostly espouse the truth in his speeches, but these recent associations with Racists have tainted him irreparably in our view, and we’re pretty sure they will go on to taint his son when he runs for the Presidency, because if Rand Paul gains political momentum, then his father’s recent associations with Nazi ideologues will be brought up again and again, ruining his chances by association, and then the nation would be cursed with another Democratic Administration for at least four years. One might see 90% of a block of the largest minorities  in America voting in lock-step against Rand Paul, instead of voting for whomever the Democrats push up there as their next dummy, simply because of his father’s hobnobbing with pretty vicious Racists.

Evidently what outed Assange’s racism was an article in Private Eye magazine by the editor, Ian Hilsop, which pointed out the long association between Julian Assange and the Holocaust-denier and notorious anti-Semite, Israel Shamir ( so labelled by both the leftwing British daily, the Guardian, and also the NY Times). According to Hilsop, when Assange read the article, he called Hilsop, and accused him and two other editors of being part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him, although Hilsop isn’t Jewish, and the other two editors had Gentile mothers. Likewise Assange accused the producer of a BBC report critical of Wikileaks and Assange as having a “Zionist” wife, although the editor said that the charge was proposterous, pointed out that neither he nor his wife were even Jewish, and that she had never had any association with Zionism. Given the BBC’s own anti-Semitism in censoring listener responses critical of Arabs, but permitting blatantly anti-Semitic comments from Muslims, as well as the Guardian’s hypercritical attitude towards Israel, it is obvious that Assange has begun to revert to labelling anyone who points out his rotten associations with Racists, as being either part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him or a “Zionist”, the behaviour of a typical denuded Nazi.

Assange’s cyberparty, the Wikileaks Party, which campaigned in the recent Australian elections, and which Assange said in the Ron Paul interview was gaining 25-28% in pre-election polls. apparently crashed and burned when it turned on its proposed alliance with the environmentalist Green Party, and endorsed neo-Fascist parties like the Shooter’s Party, which wants to be able to go into any Australian National Park and murder defenseless animals at will, and the Australia First party, a foreigner-hating bunch of  White foreigners who stole Australia from the Aborigines. Evidently, that awoke the Australian Greens to the real meaning of the Wikileaks Party, and the Party melted down, receiving 0.62% of the vote, after Assange’s above prediction on TV of polling 25-28%. Quite a melt down.

Tragically, these are the type of folks that Ron Paul gives speeches for, and has on his TV show. It might be that Ron Paul is willing to talk to anyone, no matter if they are a racist or not, but personally we wonder how any true Libertarian could hold racist views, since Libertarians regard all men as being equally endowed with certain unalienable Rights, and a racist would have to view some men as being unequally endowed, or not having free-will at all because of their  genetic heritage.  Personally, we think a Racist differs little from a Communist or Socialist who would rob a man of the fruits of his labor, and one should have no contact with either. Both are haters, one of a race, the other of an entire economic class, and one contaminates oneself if one hangs out with either of them, although non-racist Socialists and Libertarians could work together politically on Civil Rights issues, like the Right to Privacy, or opposition to Corporate subsidies, or opposing a peacetime draft or “national service”, or protecting Nature to preserve Capitalism and Life on Earth. Both Racists and Communists would employ terror or violence, and whip up animus against their chosen targets; a Libertarian never, except for an animus against war, injustice, and environmental rape.

Nor should one conclude that all Ron Paul supporters or admirers of Julian Assange are necessarily or even mostly Fascists or Nazis. On the contrary, we’d say that the vast majority of Ron Paul’s rank-and-file supporters are rabidly anti-Fascist, which is why they admire him and what he has said in his campaigns so much. Likewise, many Julian Assange admirers have no idea of his connections with the foaming-at-the-mouth Jew-hater, Israel Shamir (a pseudonym). What they see is someone speaking out against the massive invasions of Privacy conducted by so many world governments, and the subjugation of the Individual around the globe. One might classify them generally as anarcho-utopians, which is pretty far from Hitlerism or Russian Stalinism.

We believe the principles of the Free-Market, of Individual Liberty, and the defense of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are the best prophylactics against the Nazi disease, a disease of Collectivism in combination with Racism. Jeffersonian Libertarianism virtually precludes the establishment of such a Nazi state or system. In fact, if Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi as some have alleged, then it is ironic that his campaigning has done more to establish a broad anti-Nazi, anti-Totalitarian mentality in the American Electorate than perhaps any other modern-day American politician, and possibly, if his motives are really to establish a Nazi State as some allege, he is so stupid as to actually have initiated widespread attitudes against Nazism and Authoritarianism in the American Public.

Ron Paul should consider that the fees he earned at the Fatima “Peace” Conference, and his friendly interview with Julian Assange on his station, may mean in the long run that Senator Ted Cruz becomes President of the United States, instead of Senator Rand Paul. As Martin Bright, a British Labour Party political analyst, explained so well, “If you choose to tolerate or defend a nasty antisemite, it is only a matter of time before people begin to wonder if you are a nasty antisemite yourself.”  And as wise Ben Franklin observed, “He who lies down with dogs, shall rise up with fleas.”

Why are you scratching your head, Dr. Paul?

Hoooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

West Coast Democrats Crucify Black Youth: The Minimum Wage Law Nail

September 24, 2013

It looks like Democratic Governors Jerry Brown and John Kitzhaber have been taking turns smashing that final bolt into the right hand of Black Youth as they nail them down from any opportunity to earn some money, and crucify them with inaction at a time in their lives when they desperately need money, and the experience of handling it.

California’s raise of its minimum wage to $10/hr, and Oregon’s to $9.15/hr will crucify the Black Youth of both states, for, at such absurdly high wage levels, it is highly unlikely that many of them will be able to make enough profit for their employers that it becomes profitable to hire them. As usual, the well-fed, well-paid Democratic and Republican legislators who passed these heinous Bills will not mention the horrendous effects it will have on hundreds of thousands of lives in these two States. The Black Youth who will remain unemployed, though a job just came up that could have employed him at the old minimum wage rate but which can’t afford to employ him at the new one, and the White teenager who will also remain unemployed, or be laid off because his employer is now losing money on his labor, not making it, — both of these are the primary victims of the Democrat’s vile and successful attempt to disemploy them, so as to eliminate competition in the labor market and thus artificially boost the wages of union workers, who can live high on the misery of young Blacks.

What gives these millionaire and near-millionaire White Men the Right to ruin the lives of these young Black Men with their Fascistic minimum wage law, one of the key demands of the Communist manifesto? What gives these arrogant mountebank politicians the Right to keep a young Black Man unemployed for years in his youth, never gaining the skills he might have gained on a job if he had freely negotiated his wage with his employer on the Free-Market, as Free Men do, but who must submit himself to the Fascist whims of Rich White Men in the California and Oregon Legislatures, just as the Southern Slaves had to submit themselves to the whims of their Miscreant White Owners, Criminals all. And Rich White Men Politicians can include Blacks and Latinos, to their shame, as they vote to hold down those that share their cultural background and knowledge.

But the minimum wage law does not just crucify Black Youth disproportionally, it also cruelly victimizes two other groups in society: the small business man and the consumer on a fixed income, such as a government pension.

The small business man, better known as a Capitalist, is now forced to either make less profit, which will mean the end of his business if he was just scraping by before the minimum wage rise, or to put up the price of his goods to cover the wage cost increase, since it is generally estimated that labor costs constitute roughly 70% of the final cost of a product. This, in turn, causes more inflation in society, and inflation is what brings about social chaos and Fascism. The Democrats, so ignorant of economics, are bringing about the rise of the Nazis with their minimum wage increases.

The final group to be crucified by the Democrat’s minimum wage hike are the millions in these two States on fixed incomes, who can barely keep up with the tripleing and quadrupleing of the cost of their basic necessities that the Democrat’s inflation (with much help from the FED and Quisling-Republicans) has engineered in the last seven years. Now that the minimum wage has tragically hit $10, fresh accelerations in inflation will be forthcoming, and many elderly will die as they cut back on food and heat. But don’t expect the Democratic legislators and Governors to be charged with their murder, or to attend their funerals. Just like the lives of the Young Black Men which have been ruined by this law, just like the lives of the White teenagers that have been derailed by this law, just like the lives of the many Free-Market Capitalist small Businessmen who will have to shut their doors, or never open them in the first place, and just like the lives of the elderly Democratic pensioner, whose lifetime pension has just been significantly reduced in its purchasing power by inflation, — just like all these groups, the deaths of the elderly from self-neglect will not be reported in the press.  And just like these four groups that suffer such damage from this malevolent law, so too will this Fascistic, inflationary, Government intrusion into the Free Market for Labor hurt you, as you pay through the nose for every little service. These Miscreants have destroyed the value of the Dollar, and vomited on the ideas of Saving and Frugality.

California and Oregon Democrats —- you wanted inflation and unemployment and you’re going to get it. Enjoy your poverty, Fascists!

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Is it Constitutional in America to Discriminate in a Business? An Internal Debate

August 5, 2013

Silverwolf cleared the decks of his internal Parliament, and presented to the tabula rasa MP’s the following question: Should it be legal and is it constitutional to discriminate, on whatever basis one wishes, in one’s business in America? For example, should it be legal for an American Citizen, of Turkish cultural background and ethnicity, to refuse to sell to American-Armenians, or not let them in his store, which is open otherwise to the general public?

Obviously, this was one of the key questions and objections in the Civil Rights Act of 1963, Few doubted that picketing in protest outside of a business was a legitimate exercise of Free Speech Rights as long as the thoroughfare was kept open to the flow of pedestrians, but was it legal to enter the premises and then sit-in, in effect crippling the owners ability to do business?

This was the question that tormented Silverwolf through the long, stormy, frigid nights of the winter of ’11. Tossing and turning in his wolf’s lair, Silverwolf debated with himself this key issue which is so weighty for American jurisprudence and political theory.

First off, if I can discriminate in whom I let into my private residence, why should I not be able to discriminate in whom I let into my business premises? The meateater, the Nazi, the hunter, the fisherman, the vivisectionist, and the Stalinist all pay taxes, but if I choose not to let them into my private residence or property, nobody cries foul or racial discrimination. So why should it be different for a business?

I put this question to the late Blue Dog, a bluedog Democrat. His snap answer was that businesses were there to serve the public.

Silverwolf chewed this over, but it seemed a little idealistic to him after a few hours mulling. Come on, businesses ain’t there to serve the public; they’re there to make a profit for the owners and stockowners, and they wouldn’t start it if they didn’t think they would materially gain from it (unless they were a Good Samaritan starting the business solely to serve the public, with no interest in any profits over and above those necessary for a rude self-maintenance — not your typical business owner in America). The businessmen’s interest in profit, to further their personal pleasures, was no different than my interest in my own personal pleasure in keeping the meateater, the hunter, and the Nazi out of my desmesne, even though the meateater, hunter and Nazi might all pay taxes that pay for police and fire protection that benefits me and my property, and from which they are excluded. If it’s fair for me to exclude them from my Residential Property, why is it unfair, and even immoral, for them to deny me access to their business property, simply because I’m a wolf?

This really puzzled Silverwolf, and he recalled that Senator Barry Goldwater had objected to the Civil Rights Act precisely on this point of business owners being able to have property rights over their business premises.

Then Silverwolf argued with himself against this business discrimination with the following argument: the business district in town in limited to a certain area; if businesses were allowed to discriminate, it would be possible for a block of racist business owners to effectively exclude everyone in an area from vital necessities and services which would, de facto, force them to leave the area. For example, if all the hardware stores and food stores in the business district of a rural town were owned almost exclusively by a group of White racists, they could in effect make it impossible for all the Black people in an area to obtain the food and building materials they would need to survive in that area, and no new Black entrepreneurs could come into the market because the White racists held a virtual monopoly on all the available business licences and rentals.

Now this problem bifurcates into two problems for the Libertarian, for his reply might be that zoning laws are anti-Capitalist restrictions on Free-Market activity, and in a Libertarian society one could set up a business wherever one deemed fit. This would in effect end the monopoly on business licences that occurs when a business district is created, and business permits are required to conduct trade, that blatantly Communist restriction on Capitalism which has been so miserably tolerated for so long in America. This ending of business zoning would mean that would-be Black entrepreneurs could set up shop wherever they willed, and the racist monopoly over business licences and premises would be smashed.

But here we come to another problem in the road. So far, we have only discussed discrimination in those businesses which front onto public thoroughfares, and let’s assume for the moment that such discrimination is illegal exactly because these businesses, due to their location, can be called public businesses which have a moral duty under some undefined natural law to serve all customers, regardless of race, religion or creed. But what if we postulate a business that does not front onto a public thoroughfare, a business which was contained completely within the property of a private landowner? Should the owner of such a business be free to discriminate on the basis of race or religion?

For example, say a Korean Supremacist opens a business on a 40 acre parcel of land he is fortunate enough to own in the midst of a major downtown metropolis. The parcel is divided into two 20 acre parcels. He operates a public business that faces onto the public street in which he does not discriminate, located on the front 20 acres, But on the back 20 acres, which at no point border public property, he creates a 5 acre business zone, enclosed entirely by the private 20 acres, to which he will only permit admittance to those he regards as racially pure Koreans, who share his Korean-Supremacist views. No Whites or non-Koreans or “Whitey-lover” Koreans are allowed in this complex of stores, and the stores only accept Korean Won in payment. Is such a store illegal under the 1963 Civil Rights Act?

At this point, a great Rothbardian White Light seemed to blind Silverwolf, although he had his eyes closed to give his eyelid muscles their usual afternoon nap. He suddenly saw the solution to his dilemma, but it proved not to be final.

The solution was actually very simple. What does it say on the money? A Federal Reserve note, legal tender for all debts, public and private. It was herein that the solution lay.

If a Federal Reserve Note is legal tender and a store owner on a public street (or in a public announcement like a newspaper ad) advertises something for sale in his storefront window, then the asking price of that good or service becomes a private debt publicly advertised, and any person with the requisite amount of federal reserve notes should be able to satisfy that private debt and obtain the good or service touted. In other words, offering something for sale in terms of Federal Reserve Notes requires that you accept those notes from anyone who offers them if the private debt was publicly advertised. Not to do so would violate the contractual conditions printed on the money.

So the real reason why it is illegal to discriminate on business properties but not on private residence properties is because the Federal Reserve Note is legal tender for all debts, public and private, and anyone in America who has these notes has a right to exchange them for any publicly advertised private debt.

However, what would happen if we had precious metal coinage, as is stipulated by the U.S. Constitution? Since this coinage would not be a Federal Reserve Note, (and the Federal Reserve itself would hopefully not exist at that point) then it seems to us that the argument we made above, for non-discrimination when it comes to the use of Federal Reserve Notes, might no longer be valid. And the same problem might arise if the store only displayed its prices in foreign currency or currencies, since these are not legal tender for all debts public and private in America.

So under current law, could business owners legally discriminate against customers if they only accepted gold and silver (and copper?) coins or foreign currency as payment for their wares?

This question remains unanswered, and Silverwolf is still as Libertarianly-puzzled as before. As to what the truth of the matter is, and if there is an unshakeable political reason why discriminating in one’s business premises is immoral, it remains unclear to him.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww—Silverwolf

Dennis Johnson: A Jew-Baiter in Oklahoma

April 26, 2013

Enboldened by the Democrat’s endorsement of Senator Hagel’s anti-Semitism, it didn’t take long for more cockroaches to come out of the woodwork.

In Oklahoma, legislator Dennis Johnson actually had the gaul to spread his racist dung not just off the cuff or in an private interview, but in the hallowed halls of the Oklahoma Legislature. Here, in this publicly-supported meeting-place of the People, Johnson slandered a whole segment of the taxpaying population by vomiting forth the old Nazi canard that goes back to the Middle Ages. The Racist Johnson, perhaps emboldened by the confirmation of Senator Hagel by the Liberals, knew he could get away with spewing his Jew-baiting filth in public, and his sarcastic “apology” which even went “to the Jews” instead of “to Jews”, as if they were a monolithic block instead of individuals, showed most blatantly his ingrained Racism,while the couple of grinning hyenas sitting behind Johnson, seemed to think the Jew-baiting Slander was very funny.

Perhaps they think it’s funny because they’re not one of the million children murdered by the Nazis in the Holocaust, which is the end result of such Slander as Johnson’s. Perhaps they wouldn’t think it so funny if they were being burned to death because of Racist comments like Johnson’s. But they’re not, so these Hyenas can laugh it off. What Trashbags these legislators are!

Remember that the end goal of all Racists is the murder of little kids and old women.

And did you notice what an obese “chazzer” Johnson is? It’s obvious that when it comes to greed, Johnson is greedy about food. So it’s not surprising that he slanders other people with his own very obvious vice. Obese people are taking the food out of the mouths of little children, driving up the cost of food for the world’s poor, and starving some kid to death in the third world, so it’s not surprising that they wouldn’t mind trying to whip up hatred and divide Americans against each other by promoting Racism, a false doctrine that has murdered tens of millions of people throughout history.

The Libertarian is an anti-Racist in the sense that he has no group image about others: he sees each man as an Individual, with Natural Law, or God-given, Rights, and knows that the prejudiced man, the man who “pre-judges” his fellow man on the basis of some bias, whether through racist propaganda or real life encounters with someone of that ethnic group or a combination of these two, — such a pre-judger is a stupid man, a boring man; a man whose mind moves in a few fixed catagories.

Have you even noticed how Racists are usually the dullest people?

Now, one supposes that in theory it is possible for someone to be a Libertarian, believing that all men have Natural Rights, but also believe that all members of some specific ethnic group are all one way or another, or are all bad, but it seems highly unlikely in a Libertarian. And even more unlikely if you consider the broad ethnic makeup of leading Libertarian thinkers, from Murray Rothbard and Ayn Rand to Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. You couldn’t read much Libertarian literature if you were a bigot, because so much of its writings were and are done by so-called minority group members — minority group members to those that think in terms of groups, but only fellow citizens with equal Rights in the view of Libertarians.

And Libertarians are anti-Racists  in the sense that they will tolerate no special privileges for special groups at the expense of the Rights of everyone not in those groups, or at the expense of some other specified group. This prevents the creation of Racist laws.

One of the most difficult and most important actions in life is not to create images in the mind, either images of ones closest relatives or acquaintances or images of whole groups of people. Or even images of oneself. People, like the Cosmos, are always in flux and creating their own destinies. They are Action, not fixed Substance. And both Libertarianism and Existentialism, that wonderful Philosophy from the 50s and 60s which fully agrees with Libertarianism that one is completely responsible for ones actions and must bear that responsibility oneself — both these doctrines look solely at people’s actions, not some pre-judged image of people.

Libertarians should target such Racist Trash as Dennis Johnson for unelection, and vote such Miscreants out at the next opportunity. America should have no truck with Racists, especially in our Legislatures and National Cabinet. Let them go back to Europe and Russia, where they’ll be right at home.

And if Silverwolf ever has a store, he sure hopes Dennis Johnson doesn’t come in and try to buy something. Johnson might try to “Goy me down on the price.”

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

It’s Time to Arm Europe’s Jews

November 23, 2012

The recent anti-Semitic attack on Tottenham Hotspur football supporters in Italy, and the racist chants that preceded it during the game, along with the recent murderous attack against Jews in Toulouse and numerous other places, show the need for the European officials and governments to legalize gun ownership for Jews throughout Europe. The constant barrage of Jew-hatred coming from the various Islamic Nazi groups like Hamas, as well as Europe’s long-proven love of Jew-hatred, as last year’s polling in Europe showed, with Germany, Poland and Portugal all at the highest levels of anti-Semitism and the Netherlands at the lowest, — all this has contributed to an atmosphere where Jew-hatred is once again acceptable.

Now, in America, every racist who tries to whip up hatred and murder against Blacks, Jews, Latinos, or any other minority, or physically assaults them, well knows that he might easily come up against a military veteran who knows how to use a weapon, and has one also, and that he, the racist, might just wind up with a bullet between the eyes. Not so in Europe, where the lack of guns means that racist gangs can attack oldsters and individuals, knowing that they face little danger. The fact that the Jew-hater in the Toulouse murders was known to the police but, mysteriously, never had his house raided for weapons, just as the Nazi gang in Germany who murdered a series of Turks over many years were on police files, but again mysteriously were never suspected, shows that the police in “socially advanced” Europe are either so incompetent that they cannot nab murderers even when they are on their suspects list, or, more likely, that those services are themselves riddled with Nazis and their fellow travelers.

Back in the 60s, when Silverwolf was a young leftwing liberal Democrat, he was having a discussion with Cousin Dave, a World War II veteran who politically was probably a little to the Left of Joe Stalin. If they actually had carried cards, he would have had one. Well, Silverwolf brought up a California gun control measure which was on the ballot. Gun control measures at that time were quite new and somewhat revolutionary. Most Liberals were strongly in favor; the far Right vehemently opposed them. Silverwolf figured a staunch Leftist like Cousin Dave would be all gung-ho for the measure, but no.

“Ha”, he snorted contemptuously, “if that thing passed, the Fascists would be trying to take over in a week.”

Sadly, Silverwolf has come to agree with him, and you can see this in Europe, where the continuing propaganda war against Israel and Jews goes on unabated, as it has since 1948 thanks to a series of whimpy American presidents who have tempered Israel’s hand whenever she was in striking distant of completely annihilating the Arab wing of the old Nazi Party. It happened again just three days ago.

The attack on the Tottenham football supporters should be the last straw. Europe’s Jews need to go into the streets and demand the right to own guns, the same right that all Americans enjoy, in a country that has not seen a mass racist attack on its citizens in a long while as occurs in Europe every few days and weeks with regularity. Words don’t prevent racist attacks; guns do.

Uzi: the final solution to the Nazi problem.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

The French Fuehrer’s Furore: The Racist Sarkozy Targets the Roma

September 8, 2010

“Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” , so went the great revolutionary cry that once put France at the forefront of a Libertarian  movement against human tyranny. But no more. It seems the older the French Republic gets, the worse it gets, and the more and more racist it grows.

But now France has crossed the line from merely a racist, bigoted society, to one that is actively fanning the flames of ethnic hatred, as that Fascist, Racist Miscreant, Nikolas Sarkozy, comes out with one of the most disgusting and xenophobic diktats in the midst of Europe since the days of the Nazi Criminals. Sarkozy has indiscriminately libeled a whole people, the Roma, more commonly but inaccurately known as Gypsies, from a misnomered, mistaken old idea that the Roma originated in Egypt. Sarkozy said that the Roma were engaged in crime, exploitation of children, drug trafficking, and prostitution, and ordered that their squatter camps be dismantled and the inhabitants “evacuated” out of the country. And this, despite the fact that under the EU rules, people are allowed to enter France if they are from a member country, and so it is quite possible that some of these people in these camps are there completely legally ( a person from the EU can stay in France up to three months, unless they are deemed a security threat, although after that they are supposed to get work-permits and long-term residency visas).

But what is so Racist about Sarkozy’s anti-Libertarian diktat is that it singles out a single group of people, and not only singles out that one group, but also demonizes all members of that group by saying “they engage in…” and then listing, coincidentally, the exact same canards and racist stereotypes that Hitler used against these same people, when he and the Nazis and the German Nation murdered between 500,000 and 1.5 million Roma it is estimated (many were buried in unmarked mass graves, perhaps like the one that was dug up yesterday in Slovakia left over from the Nazi murder spree in WW II). Note that Sarkozy didn’t say “We’re going to check the papers of every single person living in France, and anyone, of any ethnic background, who is here illegally will be driven to the border immediately post haste and deported to their country of origin”.

No, only the Roma.

Not only is this one of the most disgusting actions undertaken by a Western leader that Silverwolf can recall, stinking of the old segregationist South and the scat smell of Hitler’s brownshirts, it is rendered even more disgusting by the fact that, according to the BBC, 65% of the French public support these racist expulsions.

“Socialist, leftist, progressive France”. The myth that Leftists leave no odor has been busted. Racism is the fruit of Socialism, whether one calls it the French Left, the Soviet Union, the EU, Nasser’s Egypt, or El Gordo Chavez of Caracas. All a bunch of Racist Scum. France, with its vast “progressive” unions, is always braying about the “solidarity” of the workers, and all of humanity. But when their exorbitant wages, and cushy retirements are threatened by labor competition from nomads like the Roma, the government makes it virtually impossible to get a work permit, while declaring those without work-permits illegal and deportable. This guarantees a supply of cheap, exploitable labor for the French, which can be thrown out of the country at whim, while maintaining the overvalued wage and benefit packages of the union workers and the public sector employees, at the expense usually of the unemployable French youth just graduating from college or high school, and the pay packets of all non-union, non-government, workers holding jobs. A very similar economic mechanism can be seen in the U.S., with immigrant labor from south of the border artificially boosting union wages at the expense of Black and White youth unemployment ( and all made possible by the restrictionist and immoral minimum wage laws).

And what is further disgusting about this Racist worm, Sarkozy, is that he is probably carrying out this vile action because he is currently so low in the polls. He is exploiting the Roma for his own political gain — and Roma remember also means little girls of four and grandmas of eighty-four — forcing these people to the border in a matter of days, even though some of them had lived and worked in France for years, or supported themselves independently by means of, say, scrapping metal. Those individuals who have committed no crime under Libertarian Doctrine, and who have actually contributed to trade and Capitalism within France during their sojourn there, are now to be demonized in the same blanket, stereotypical, racist language that the War Criminal Hitler used against the Jews and the Roma.

Only this is not Hitler, but the leaders of one of the great supposedly Libertarian nations in modern history; a counterpart to the American Revolution, and, in many ways, Cromwell’s Glorious Revolution of 1688. And a “leader”, incidentally, who appeared before the world, at the G-8 meeting in 2009, drunk out of his gourd, after boozing it up with Valery Puta, the brave whale-murderer. (Ain’t it too bad whales don’t have harpoons to fight back against their murderers? For once, the rapist raped would make such a heartwarming world news story.) This drunken racist should look in the mirror before he defames an entire people.

For Sarkozy to do this is a great Moral Crime, and Libertarians, who de rigueur view all  people solely as Individuals, without the racist image, and never as members of some notional group that does not really exist in reality, should oppose it. There is only the Human Race, composed of Individuals, although the Consciousness of Mankind is actually a Collective Consciousness (most of it fixed and fossilized in books), with every new discovery expanding it. But the Racists and the Collectivists must get people to think in terms of groups, or else their entire false ideologies fall apart like dried leaves grasped by the hand of Truth. And that is why and how they have managed to divide us into groups: ethnic, nationalistic, religious. All notional phantoms.

So  the Inebriate Sarkozy brands an entire people or group of Human Beings as criminals, exploiters of children, drug traffickers, prostitutes and thieves, pandering to the lowest forms of prejudice in men, like a Jules Streicher, Lester Maddox, Strom Thurmond, Cur Oswald Moseley, or Theodore Bilbo. And  this despite the fact that there must be many many individuals amongst the Roma who have never broken the law, or what a Libertarian would consider a valid law (a property crime through coercion against another). He’s a Defamer, a Racist Whore.

Libertarians have only three choices for taking direct action against the Racist Sarkozy and the Racist French Nation that backs this action by 65%. We should boycott France, and those who can afford it and understand the markets should short the Euro if advantageous, to make the populace of a Racist country pay the price in terms of getting hit in the wallet with more inflation.

The other thing we can do is to demand that our American government stop paying for the defense of these Racist-Socialist Paris-ites by no longer funding that portion of the defense budget that goes towards protecting France through NATO. These French Socialists whine about how bad the Romas are, calling them thieves and beggars, while simultaneously they steal American taxpayer’s money to sponge their defense needs off us, and while begging money from the IMF to pay for their profligate lifestyle, money provided again by the US Taxpayer. So it is the Racist-French and the Fascist Sarkozy who are the real beggars and thieves, not the poor Roma who are the longterm victims of a Socialism which has been permitted to castrate European prosperity.

One of the marks of a great society is its willingness to tolerate the outsider. What does this action make France? Vichy France.

From the heights of the great anti-Nazi Liberation Fighters and Writers Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, and Simone de Beauvoir, down to the depths of Nikolas Sarkozy: The Great Degeneration.

The ultimate goal of every Racist is the murder of little girls and old women.

Sarkozy, you’re Scum.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Helen Thomas, Racist Hag

June 8, 2010

Well, the Racists across the valley must have left the door to their outhouse open, as the pong has drifted across the valley floor, all the way to the Wolfen encampment. Either that, or Helen Thomas has been using it.

For this old Racist Hag has been opening her oral rictus lately and exuding such a stench of Racist halitosis, that it really knocks one’s head back. The “White House Dean” of press correspondents has shown that this phrase has little to do with that Libertarian Hero, John Dean, who first showed the American public what a Racist, Fascist swine was old War Criminal Nixon. No, this “Dean” is one of those “beloved souls” Murray Rothbard mentions whom American children are brainwashed into thinking represent the finest values of America, in this case Freedom of the Press.

Of course the hypocritical irony of this situation is that Thomas’ anti-Semitic and profoundly callous rant for the Jews in “Palestine” to “go back to Poland and Germany” was made while she was standing on land that she and all the other White People in America stole from the American Indians, and if we are to follow the “logic” of this Racist Hag, then all American Whites should be deported from this American Palestine that she has made her homeland, and made a very comfortable living in, since the days of President Eisenhower. This Racist has been exploiting her position on Indian Lands for 60 years without whinning about it, you’ll notice.

Not only that, but Ms. Thomas, the Racist Hag Bag, seems to overlook the fact that, 2000 years ago, Hadrian talked of his “war against the Jews”. He mentioned nothing about “Palestinians”, though that was the name the Roman Fascist Imperialists gave to their conquest of Israel. Nor does she talk about the theft of this same land by the Ottoman Turks roughly a thousand years ago, and their continued occupation of the land of the Indigenous People of Israel, much as America continues to occupy almost all of the land of the American Indians they ripped it off from, and us Silverwolves. But in America’s case, compensation was made, and a compromise was worked out (the Indian Reservations where the Indigenous largely retain autonomy), grossly unfair to the Indians as that solution seems to Silverwolf.

Of course, the correct solution would be to deport all the Wondy Whiterbreads of America, and every other person of non-Native American background back to their countries of origin, if we are to use the Racist Hag Thomas’ own advice to the Jews, and return the land to the Native Americans, and the Wolfen Tribes. That is Silverwolf’s radical solution to the problem. But of course, that is merely a Kinnikinnick dream.

And of course, Silverwolf would also permit anyone who was willing to live according to Mr. Jefferson’s amazing Constitution and Bill of Rights, that living beacon of Libertarian brilliance, to stay in America. And anyone willing to live according to the Libertarian non-aggression principle should also be allowed to stay to play here with the Indians and us Wolves. That is whom America was made for. Not those who advocate the usurpation and theft of Indigenous Lands, wherever it occurs on the planet. Nor those pea-brained Racists, who see people as images instead of Individuals.

But unfortunately in America we must tolerate their stench if they don’t break the law. That is also a Libertarian principle.

But if we could magically deport all non-Indians, non-Wolves, and non-Libertarians, we’d suggest the Racist Hag Helen Thomas be deported to the little town of Oswieczem, in Poland, better known to the world in its Germanized form as Auschwitz. The pong in the air there would probably suit her racist tastes.

Racist Auslanders Raus! and Helen Thomas, the Racist Hag Bag, can go with ’em!

Hooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Silverwolf vs. Foxman: The A.D.L.’s Feckless Victory in the Marcello Lucero Killing

April 29, 2010

Silverwolf has been pondering the truly tragic news out of the Eastern United States, news which the Anti-Defamation League has surprisingly hailed as a victory. For to Silverwolf, this news is no victory, but a heinous tragedy, and a pellucid illustration of exactly what he was talking about in his recent blog when he spoke of the dangers of hate crime laws, good intentioned though they be, leading to juries unwilling to convict, and turning Racist Criminals into martyrs.

And so, only a few hours after posting those thoughts, Silverwolf read of the horrendous verdict in which the “manslaughterer” of a 37-year old Ecuadorian immigrant living on Long Island who was stabbed to death in a racist gang attack, was convicted on a charge of a first degree manslaughter hate crime. He received a sentence of from 8 to 25 years. The ADL website portrays it thusly:

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/HatCr_51/5739_51.htm

And this was the verdict roughly seventeen months after the original incident, which was reported on the ADL website thusly:

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/HatCr_51/5388_51.htm

This is a Libertarian Outrage! That a Racist could go out with a gang of other Racists, looking for Latino-appearing people on the streets to attack, and in the course of an attack, stab to death a man, and then get away with eight years is a great atrocity, not something for the ADL to call a great victory. Let’s remember that many states permit huge reductions in sentence for good behaviour behind bars, often amounting to a reduction of two-thirds of the sentence. Now, Silverwolf is not aware if such reductions apply in New York State where this Travesty of Justice occurred, but if they do, then this Racist Miscreant and “Manslaughterer” (for Libel reasons, we cannot call him what he is) could be out in 2 2/3 years. And that the ADL calls a victory.

Now, there are several interesting points here. Firstly, while the ADL claims this to be a victory, the family of the victim saw it for what it was — a judicial slap on the wrist for a Racist Crime that should been smashed with the full force of the Hammer of the Malefactor, administered through the law courts and the jail system. They were not as enthralled with this Miscarriage of Justice as the ADL. The “Latin Americanist blog” reported the tragedy thusly, which includes a link to the statements of the victims brother to Ecuadorian radio.

http://ourlatinamerica.blogspot.com/2010/04/mixed-verdict-in-marcelo-lucero-case.html

And one must ask, why were not all the members of this racist gang prosecuted for this murder? They all went out together, with intent to physically harm someone, based solely on what they perceived as their race or ethnic background, in this case Latinos. What kind of message does this send to racist groups, when a vigilante gang doesn’t get life in jail in solitary at hard labor for such a crime? Such a fair punishment would do more to stop racist violence than all the hate crime legislation that the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center seem to think will magically stop hate crimes, especially when the investigating police forces, and the prosecuting D.A.’s office are riddled with racists, as they are bound to be, somewhere, at some time, in some locales, in America. Hate crime legislation is no solution for violent racist attacks; Draconian long sentences of solitary at hard labor are. And if the Racist Murderers go on hunger strike, then they should be permitted to commit suicide under Libertarian doctrine, and free up the cell and save the taxpayer the costs. A racist’s Right to commit suicide should never be abridged, under the Libertarian Property Right of Self-Ownership.

No, what this case clearly shows is the failure of hate crime legislation to adequately protect minority groups that have been and still are targets of racist violence.

So what would be a Libertarian solution according to you, Silverwolf, you may query?

Well, first of all, under a Libertarian government, no body would be in jail for possessing drugs. Or even vending to anyone 18 or older. So that would reduce the prison population by about 70%, since that is roughly the percentage of the prison population in jail for non-violent drug offenses. Plenty of room for racist murderers, — and any kind of murderers — then. No need to skimp on sentences.

Moreover, there would be nothing to stop the legislature, or the People through the Initiative Process, from instructing their Judiciary to take into account racist factors when sentencing. For example, if someone murdered someone for their wallet they’d get 40 years; if they murdered them solely because (and they announced it before hand to witnesses, and/or published their intentions in literature,  and/or admitted it to police after the crime, as well as under oath in court) the victim was an Armenian or a Trobriand Islander, or a Redhead, then they might get 50 years — or life. So, not having hate crimes does not preclude judges from taking what they perceive to be violence motivated by clear cut racism into account, which in turn was based on objective facts and actions in the public record of the trial, when deliberating the length of sentence.

But what is so glaringly obvious in this great tragedy, is that if someone is convicted of a first degree hate crime, and that crime results in the death of someone, then the crime would have to be, of necessity, the Crime of Murder. How could a First Degree Hate Crime, that resulted in death of the victim, ever be Manslaughter? Or anything else. This is a clear cop-out, and exactly the point that Silverwolf make in his last blog — that juries will not convict, or will go along with plea bargains in cases that cry out for Life without Parole in Solitary at Hard Labor. That should be the punishment for every racist murder, and every racist attack that results in grievous bodily injury. Not a mollycoddling eight years, with 2/3 off for good behaviour. That is an outrage! And not only the person who actually murdered the victim, but every member of that gang would have to be prosecuted and convicted. So not only is this sentence a grave joke, but the fact that none of the other gang is rotting in solitary is also barbaric. It is getting away with murder seven times over!

Silverwolf is afraid that slick pro-Racist lawyers will figure out ways to introduce doubts into juries minds, when defending against convictions in hate crimes cases that would routinely get very long sentences for anyone committing violence in a Libertarian society, whether they were Racists or not.( And since Racists could not be trusted to have a cellmate, since they might attack them based solely on their ethnic background, then they must obviously be kept in solitary during their incarceration.) Given the level of racism still around in America, it’s quite probable that someone on that jury trying the hate crime could be extremely bigoted or prejudiced, or even violently prejudiced against a specific minority group, and by keeping quiet about it, they could effectively engage in jury nullification by refusing to convict if there were the slightest doubt that a hate crime had been committed. If hate crimes carried sentences that were more, or greatly more, severe that normal sentences, then juries would be even more reluctant to convict if there were crypto-racists hidden on them. Has ADL or SPLC ever thought about this? It’s an obvious flaw in their logic. And these guys are mostly lawyers, and they can’t figure it out! (And Silverwolf ain’t.)

But of course, they cannot accept this very simple Libertarian Final Solution to the Racial Violence Problem, — life in solitary at hard labor without parole — because their agenda is so diametrically opposed to the Libertarians in certain economic and philosophical areas that they never would agree to anything Libertarians would propose, even if it largely solved the problems they say are so crucial to American society.

Abraham Foxman, along with the Anti-Defamation League, as well as groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center, have done critical and valuable work in the public interest, by identifying groups that try to whip up hatred against Americans, based on their ethnic background, and they have defended persons of every type of ethnic background with their actions. Their publishing of lists of neo-Fascist and Racist groups, and the publishing of photos of their leaders on the web, has been invaluable in protecting the targeted victims of these Miscreants (and a combo of steady race hatred mixed with National Socialism sure makes for some ugly pusses, as those pics can attest.) We should not underestimate these group’s worth (because who else was taking on the task of identifying these Racist Miscreants?). But that does not mean that we have to accept their approach as the only one, or their judgements as the best. And this tragic verdict shows exactly what Silverwolf means.

Life in Solitary at Hard Labor without Parole — the Final Solution to the Racist Murder Problem!

Hooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Silverwolf Collaborates With The Racists: The 2010 U.S. Census

March 12, 2010

Silverwolf has a confession to make; one that he is not at all proud of. For he must admit to his public that he has collaborated in evil, he has worked with the racists, he has cooperated in an Unconstitutional activity: in sum, he has filled out and mailed back his 2010 Census Form.

Yes, your opprobrium on Silverwolf’s head is well-deserved for what self-respecting Libertarian who would fill out the Census Form, could bare to look at his hirsute muzzle in the mirror in the morning? However, Silverwolf fully admits to being fearful of the consequences for not collaborating with Evil in this case: a $5,000 fine; and for not wanting to hassle with arguing the Constitutional line which clearly makes virtually all of the questions in the Census Form Unconstitutional: thousands of dollars and months spent on Constitutional Lawyers in a futile attempt to rectify an Unconstitutional activity. No thanks.

And Silverwolf shamefully admits to even collaborating with the Racists in Washington as they require that each person classify themselves according to race, in the best tradition of the Nazi Criminals. And so, when given a choice of White, Black, Native American, or his race, he unhesitatingly filled in the fourth choice: The Lobo Breed, the official name of the Wolfen Race. And, as required by Unconstitutional law, his name and age: Lobo Silverwolf, 399 years-old (as the reader is probably aware by now, 400 marks the beginning of “middle age” for Wolves).

Of course, under Jefferson’s great insight, all men were to be regarded as equal in Rights before the Law, and the ethnic background of the person was completely immaterial as far as his Rights under the Rights of Man. This is one of the great Principles of the United States Constitution, which the Racists of the Democratic Party have overthrown with their NoseyParker questionnaire, and their Hitlerian forcing of every American to racially classify themselves.

The Democrats evidently have never heard of the Human Race.

Those of us who kowtow and collaborate in evil just to avoid a mere $5,000 fine, and a visit from a “government agent” are a disgraceful example to the upcoming generations of their elder’s cooperation with Evil; we should be kept away from these budding fruits of Humanity so that we do not contaminate them with our Pragmatism, or frizz their delicate blooms by telling them “don’t rock the boat”. This American Ship of State is in bad need of a rocker, and it will be the upcoming Libertarian generations, who also understand Austrian Economics and Jeffersonian Republicanism, who will jettison the Racists overboard, along with the flotsam and jetsam of  their disgusting racial classifications of Human Beings.

But the Racists are in full charge as usual in Washington, and they will be divvying up the spoils looted from the taxpayers, based on the various percentages of Human Beings in America who are either bamboozled or coerced into a racist Self-classification. And in the process of doing that, they have divided the People into various groups, according to some preconceived image of what a race means, and thus contributed greatly to racism, disunity, and social strife.

And we know that intermarriage, rape, and cohabitation have made a truly racial classification a nonsense, and most people are aware of that. Yet the prejudice-breeders in Congress and the White House are intent on continuing to whip up this hatred and rivalry of race against race, and group against group. And they have succeeded most magnificently, haven’t they, Oh Massa Farrakhan!

The 2010 Unconstitutional U.S. Census: it could have been devised by Hitler.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf