Posts Tagged ‘Ron Paul’

Libertarians Crush The Democrats in Florida Special Election

March 17, 2014

Few political pundits recall that it was Dionysius of Halicarnassus who said that “history is philosophy teaching by example”. Certainly few Democratic pundits remembered that adage, so they were surprised by their very significant defeat in the Florida Special Election for the House last week. Had they realized the hatred of American Individualists for a constant barrage and assault on their personal energies in order to fulfill unConstitutional demands inflicted on them by the State, they might have anticipated the results. But they were obviously fooling themselves.

The Democrats lost, not because of the Republicans, but because of the Libertarian vote for Lucas Overby, which came in at 4.8%. This was two and two-thirds as much as the difference between the Democrats and Republicans, and unusually high for a Libertarian candidate, who normally garner 1-2% of the vote, though there have been a few cases where they topped 5%. This shows that the work of Libertarian writers and thinkers, along with the campaign ideas of Ron Paul, and combined with the obvious incompetence of the Democrats in everything they touch, has brought a lot of people to see the necessity of voting Libertarian. Additionally, we’d guess that a lot of younger voters, who voted for Obama, now realized they voted for a propagandized Image who has burdened them with trillions of new dollars of debt, imposed a healthcare mandate on them that will take most of their spare cash for years to come if they have any kind of decent income, and made it even harder for poor youths to get any kind of work through jacking up the minimum wage law. We’d bet a lot of these former Obama voters just didn’t turn up, or moved over to the true Classical Liberalism of the Libertarians. Obama’s enforcement of the pot laws, in the face of so many states legalizing it, or semi-legalizing it, shows the Youth better than anything else what an old reactionary fogey is the President.

And even the Republicans were scared. The Libertarian Frankenstein which Ron Paul sowed together and revivified has stormed out of the castle and is terrorizing the political landscape all over America, and the Republican’s even had to have Senator Rand Paul call in his support for candidate Jolly, the very son of the man who energized that Frankenstein. Both the Republicans and the Democratic peasants were out with their flaming flambeaus, looking for the giant who might topple them. The fact that the Libertarian got 266% of the difference between the Republican winner and the Democratic loser must scare the hell out of both parties, and you can bet they’ll start to incorporate some of Libertarian rhetoric in their speeches, since they are both parties of conforming lemmings, with political dogmas and image-making based on false, un-Jeffersonian, ideologies.

It was also clear they were scared from the fact that the media made little or no mention of the unusually high Libertarian vote, not wanting to call attention to the fact, which attention might serve to make it “cool” to vote Libertarian.

Libertarian Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson got roughly 1% of the vote in 2012. A Libertarian gets almost 5% in a bellweather House election in 2014. It shows you what 17 months of big State Socialism does to people’s psyches.

This is just the beginning.

Hoooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Advertisements

If the Ukraine Were Mexico: A Parallelogram Situation Fantasy

March 9, 2014

Silverwolf has just read the BBC headline that a Professor had said that, yes, the invasion or incursion into Crimea by probably Russian troops was a violation of International Law. Duh, of course it is.

But so is overthrowing a democratically elected government by force with mobs murdering police, and then tolerating Nazis in five of the cabinet positions in the new, overthrown government. Liberal Democrats would condemn to High Hell any Nazi or KKK elements that showed up at a Tea Party or Libertarian or Ron Paul rally and patrolled the crowd with baseball bats and Swastika armbands, but here is Barack Obama and Diplomat Nuland funelling over $5 billion dollars to a government that is largely Nazi and which tolerates many Nazi groups. Ron Paul was criticized by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an enabler of Fascism; I wonder what they would call President Obama’s actions in installing Nazis in a government overthrown by violent Anarchists and Nazis who would have been mowed down in America if they had got anywhere near the White House, and Silverwolf wouldn’t have had much sympathy for them, because that is not the way you change government. You do it through elections, or through non-violent Gandhian methods like the Boycott or the General Strike or the picket line or the sit-in, as long as you don’t block the fire exits. But when you storm buildings, and burn police to death, and beat police armed only with shields… well, for America to legitimize that with its support is a great tragedy. And for jolly Old England too, the birthplace of Libertarianism and Free-Market (along with Holland), or at least as Free-Market as it was possible to be in those mercantilist days, when the Monarchy was the equivalent of the Congress, Presidency, Supreme Court and Federal Reserve combined into one half-senile (from inbreeding) megalomaniac.

So Putin’s incursion into a region that would be almost certainly pro-Russian in a Democratic election is called a violation of international law, as it probably technically is, but Obama’s backing of violent Nazis who overthrow a Democratic election is honky-dorey, huh? That’s your “liberal Democrat” Obama.

Obama is a lunatic, and he is bringing us to the brink of a world war, for no valid reasons. Elections were coming up soon in Ukraine. If Yanuko had been tried for his crimes, that would have been an orderly, legalistic and just way of handling the situation. But violently overthrowing him, and then blaming Putin for putting his troops in when a Nazi has just been installed as Defense Minister, and another as Chief Prosecutor, is just insane. What is going on in that brain of Obama’s? Any half-drunk bar room philosopher could have predicted this one. Of course Putin wasn’t going to sit around and do nothing when, as Professor Steven Cohen of NYU and Princeton so aptly put it, you’ve moved the Berlin Wall from Germany to the edge of Russia. And the NATO threat to give missiles to the new Nazi Government? How did our great statesman President think Russia was going to react to that one after the history of World War II? That heckler who heckled Obama about when was World War III going to start really hit the nail on the head.  The President tried to laugh it off, rather hollowly we thought, but that heckler was more realistic than our Chief Executive. The President, this so-called Liberal who supports Nazi thugs in government, has rekindled the Cold War in a few short days with his stupidity. Add ‘im to Aretha’s Chain of Fools.

Silverwolf, as you know, loathes Vlad Putin for his equivalent of a war crime in aiding Syria, Iran, and Libya under the War Criminal Ghaddafi, as well as his murder of a defenseless whale, worth much more than his miserable carcass, but he’d never watched Putin in detail, except for a few minutes of his recent press conference. So he went back and watched the entire hour-long conference, and was fascinated.

There are several striking things about Putin. First, he looks like he doesn’t have a wrinkle on his face. Make up? Or a guy who sleeps soundly at night. Secondly, he talks very fluently, like a lawyer. No Ron Paul-esque flounderings around like a beached seal, filled with “you knows” for Putin; he had very few pauses. And he seemed to know exactly what he wanted to say. Silverwolf nyet knows Rooskee, so he didn’t know precisely what he was saying, but he sounded calm, and not very vicious. Also, he seemed to be giving quite depthful analyses and reasons for what he was doing, building the case that a democratically-elected President, who had been violently overthrown, had requested that he intervene in his country. That sounds pretty International-Law-ish to Silverwolf. If President Obama were overthrown in an invasion by Cuba, or overthrown by violent mobs funded by Cuba, and he fled to Canada and asked the Canadian Prime Minister to intervene to protect the lives of Americans from Cuban mobs, wouldn’t that be justified? So Putin’s incursion into Crimea might be technically a violation of International Law, but Crimea was artifically annexed to Ukraine by Krushchev (Nikita S. — and please don’t forget the “S” so you don’t confuse him with another Nikita Krushchev), so why is the world suddenly so eager to acknowledge the validity of that action by the Soviet dictator of that day on this issue?

But what was most striking about what he was saying was that most of it was interesting. How many politicians could you listen to who could give you an interesting and depthful analysis of a current critical situation that sounded like a deep-thinking university professor? Putin was interesting; Obama is boring.

Some of his dodges, though, were a bit ridiculous. He claimed that no Russian troops had entered Crimea, and those armed men were all pro-Russian people’s militias. You know, you can buy those uniforms in an army surplus store, he argued. But he said it in way that showed he obviously didn’t believe it himself.

The other thing about Putin is his appearance. He has such a characteristically Russian face, if there is such a thing, you could see why they picked him for the KGB. And he has such a weird look in his eye when he looks straight at the camera, and appears to be ever-so-slightly cross-eyed, that it gives him the appearance of intense, almost fanatical, concentration. Finally, his face is extremely animated as he talks, the eyebrows going up and down, the cheeks scrunching. At one moment, a reporter’s musical cellphone goes off, and Putin looks a little exasperated, but is courteous and waits till the woman leaves the room with a comment like “pretty music”, but you could see that the King of the Russian Empire wasn’t too pleased about a stupid reporter interrupting his press conference. Silverwolf can’t blame him.

So Silverwolf hates to say it, but he almost liked Putin, or at least, was quite impressed with his intelligence, and the depth of his thinking. He can see why Russians could like him, and he certainly isn’t letting the flies grow on him when Nazis are coming to power right on his borders; Nazis armed with nuclear missiles and backed by Germany. Putin really kneed the hypocrisy of the West in the groin with his incisive comments, especially after all the garbage one has heard being drummed out in the U.S. press and the BBC. And Silverwolf is damn glad those ethnic Russians and Tartars in the Crimea will have Russian soldiers around to protect them from the Nazi gangs roaming around Kiev, now being given legitimacy by the Obama Administration by calling them the Provisional Government.

Now, let’s imagine a parallelogram fantasy.

What if… in North Mexico a movement arises calling itself L’Azteca Action, which claims that Gringos, Americanos, Protestants, and Capitalists run the entire economy of the region, grinding the poor Mexicans into the dirt, and that they should be expelled and their property confiscated, and that the People want a pure Mexican Mexico. They advocate making Spanish the only legal language. Then there are several assaults on Protestants by gangs of Catholics resulting in hospitalizations, and a general hostility is whipped up against American retirees who are “bleeding the land and El Pueblo Mexicano.” Capitalism is denounced, and murderers of American civilians during the Revolution, like Pancho Villa with his raids in New Mexico, are glorified. Villa is called a great hero, a Mexican Patriot, and his crimes are overlooked. Gangs of thugs armed with baseball bats and dressed in T-shirts bearing pictures of Villa, and the symbol of Villa’s militia which had carried out atrocities against women and children during the Revolution, patrol the streets as “security”, and the chief of police of the entire region as well as the chief prosecutor are L’Azteca Action party members.

Then it turns out that Russia has funnelled over $5 billion to L’Azteca to stir up trouble in the region, and suddenly tens of thousands of terrified American retirees, Protestants, and businessmen are fleeing to the border and stampeding into America. There is extensive media footage of American ex-pats kissing American soil upon arrival at the U.S. Border at Calexico and Naco. When L’Azteca gangs begin to overrun government buildings in areas where democratic local elections had protected the Rights of Americans, Protestants, and Capitalists, and a Party member, who has called these three groups “scum”, heads the Security Ministry, then President Obama decides to send American Troops into those border regions where Americans, Protestants, non-Mexicans, Capitalists, etc. form 70%-plus majorities, to protect American Citizens, and there are welcoming crowds lining the roads, waving American flags. In response to the American “invasion” of Mexico, Russian President Putin warns America that it is violating International Law and there will be a heavy price to pay. The rhetoric and name-calling escalates on both sides. Defiant, the American President maintains his troops in Northern Mexico, and brings in even more troops to protect other non-Fascist regions. Putin, claiming the moral high ground, and talking about morality and principle, offers to supply L’Azteca Action with nuclear weapons, according to a NATO-like treaty the Russians have with Mexico to come to its aid if its sovereignty was ever threatened, and in order to “protect the Mexican People and show that infringements of International Law have their costs.” And, inevitably, when L’Azteca Action, supported by all the Latin American nations, gets its missiles, it immediately demands the return of the lands stolen by America during the Mexican-American War which the Great Libertarian Henry David Thoreau went to jail resisting. That includes California, Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada. Just give us that, and there will be Peace, cries L’Azteca Action, and massive, violent mobs all across Northern Mexico, whipped up by State media propaganda, demonstrate in support. War Against the Capitalists, Gringos, English-speakers, and any Mexican against our Holy Cause! Liberate Nevada! Free California. New Mexico for the Mexicans!

And soon the missiles start flying.

Putin’s incursion is illegal, and so was Yanuko’s overthrow. But the practical effect of Obama’s actions is to throw Russia into a huge insecurity. After all, this could well mean NATO missiles in the hands of a Nazi Regime right on Russia’s borders; a Regime, backed by Germany, which had fought with Nazi Germany against Russia, and murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians, while glorifying mass murderers of Poles and Jews like Stefan Bandera and Chmelnitsky. Of course this was going to make Russia paranoid, and make all the ethnic Russians, and what was left of the Jews and Poles in Ukraine after the decimations of World War II, very insecure. Any idiot could have figured that out, but Obama couldn’t. This action shows that he is not fit to be President, and out of touch with reality. This is a very dangerous miscalculation by the President, and shows his lack of true Statesmanship.

Put yourself in the Russian’s place, America. Would you want a fanatical, bloodthirsty Pancho Villa to have nuclear weapons on your border, pointing at you? That is what Russians must be feeling right now. The Bipartisan Fascists, led by President Obama, have set the Cold War and World Progress back about a quarter-century with their and his stupid, puerile, and very dangerous actions. What a great tragedy for the world, and for America. And what a blundering fool is the President of the United States.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Ron Paul Self-Taints: Hanging Out with the Racists

September 27, 2013

Ron Paul’s recent speaking engagement at a fundraiser for a Holocaust-denying, renegade Catholic priest, who has been thrown out of the Church by the Vatican, combined with his nearly simultaneous interview of the anti-Semite, Julian Assange, on Paul’s web channel, have seriously damaged his credibility in this observer’s eyes, and makes us wonder if our long support of Ron Paul and his principles was mis-directed.

On the Principles for which he has argued, and they are the Jeffersonian Principles of Good Governance, the Natural Rights Liberty of the Individual, and the Free-Market, we have little disagreement.  After reading of the allegations against Ron Paul, many times seemingly blown up and repeated over and over by the liberal-left Democratic media without quoting the actual abuses, and given the economic value to the vested interests that benefit from all the abuses in America that Ron Paul has argued against over and over, — given these two factors, we thought. during his two campaigns, that Ron Paul was being unfairly smeared by the Democratic Left, But these old allegations. in combination with Ron Paul’s recent hobnobbing with two notorious Holocaust-denying Jew-haters, make us believe that they could well be true. Ron Paul may mostly espouse the truth in his speeches, but these recent associations with Racists have tainted him irreparably in our view, and we’re pretty sure they will go on to taint his son when he runs for the Presidency, because if Rand Paul gains political momentum, then his father’s recent associations with Nazi ideologues will be brought up again and again, ruining his chances by association, and then the nation would be cursed with another Democratic Administration for at least four years. One might see 90% of a block of the largest minorities  in America voting in lock-step against Rand Paul, instead of voting for whomever the Democrats push up there as their next dummy, simply because of his father’s hobnobbing with pretty vicious Racists.

Evidently what outed Assange’s racism was an article in Private Eye magazine by the editor, Ian Hilsop, which pointed out the long association between Julian Assange and the Holocaust-denier and notorious anti-Semite, Israel Shamir ( so labelled by both the leftwing British daily, the Guardian, and also the NY Times). According to Hilsop, when Assange read the article, he called Hilsop, and accused him and two other editors of being part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him, although Hilsop isn’t Jewish, and the other two editors had Gentile mothers. Likewise Assange accused the producer of a BBC report critical of Wikileaks and Assange as having a “Zionist” wife, although the editor said that the charge was proposterous, pointed out that neither he nor his wife were even Jewish, and that she had never had any association with Zionism. Given the BBC’s own anti-Semitism in censoring listener responses critical of Arabs, but permitting blatantly anti-Semitic comments from Muslims, as well as the Guardian’s hypercritical attitude towards Israel, it is obvious that Assange has begun to revert to labelling anyone who points out his rotten associations with Racists, as being either part of a “Jewish Conspiracy” against him or a “Zionist”, the behaviour of a typical denuded Nazi.

Assange’s cyberparty, the Wikileaks Party, which campaigned in the recent Australian elections, and which Assange said in the Ron Paul interview was gaining 25-28% in pre-election polls. apparently crashed and burned when it turned on its proposed alliance with the environmentalist Green Party, and endorsed neo-Fascist parties like the Shooter’s Party, which wants to be able to go into any Australian National Park and murder defenseless animals at will, and the Australia First party, a foreigner-hating bunch of  White foreigners who stole Australia from the Aborigines. Evidently, that awoke the Australian Greens to the real meaning of the Wikileaks Party, and the Party melted down, receiving 0.62% of the vote, after Assange’s above prediction on TV of polling 25-28%. Quite a melt down.

Tragically, these are the type of folks that Ron Paul gives speeches for, and has on his TV show. It might be that Ron Paul is willing to talk to anyone, no matter if they are a racist or not, but personally we wonder how any true Libertarian could hold racist views, since Libertarians regard all men as being equally endowed with certain unalienable Rights, and a racist would have to view some men as being unequally endowed, or not having free-will at all because of their  genetic heritage.  Personally, we think a Racist differs little from a Communist or Socialist who would rob a man of the fruits of his labor, and one should have no contact with either. Both are haters, one of a race, the other of an entire economic class, and one contaminates oneself if one hangs out with either of them, although non-racist Socialists and Libertarians could work together politically on Civil Rights issues, like the Right to Privacy, or opposition to Corporate subsidies, or opposing a peacetime draft or “national service”, or protecting Nature to preserve Capitalism and Life on Earth. Both Racists and Communists would employ terror or violence, and whip up animus against their chosen targets; a Libertarian never, except for an animus against war, injustice, and environmental rape.

Nor should one conclude that all Ron Paul supporters or admirers of Julian Assange are necessarily or even mostly Fascists or Nazis. On the contrary, we’d say that the vast majority of Ron Paul’s rank-and-file supporters are rabidly anti-Fascist, which is why they admire him and what he has said in his campaigns so much. Likewise, many Julian Assange admirers have no idea of his connections with the foaming-at-the-mouth Jew-hater, Israel Shamir (a pseudonym). What they see is someone speaking out against the massive invasions of Privacy conducted by so many world governments, and the subjugation of the Individual around the globe. One might classify them generally as anarcho-utopians, which is pretty far from Hitlerism or Russian Stalinism.

We believe the principles of the Free-Market, of Individual Liberty, and the defense of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are the best prophylactics against the Nazi disease, a disease of Collectivism in combination with Racism. Jeffersonian Libertarianism virtually precludes the establishment of such a Nazi state or system. In fact, if Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi as some have alleged, then it is ironic that his campaigning has done more to establish a broad anti-Nazi, anti-Totalitarian mentality in the American Electorate than perhaps any other modern-day American politician, and possibly, if his motives are really to establish a Nazi State as some allege, he is so stupid as to actually have initiated widespread attitudes against Nazism and Authoritarianism in the American Public.

Ron Paul should consider that the fees he earned at the Fatima “Peace” Conference, and his friendly interview with Julian Assange on his station, may mean in the long run that Senator Ted Cruz becomes President of the United States, instead of Senator Rand Paul. As Martin Bright, a British Labour Party political analyst, explained so well, “If you choose to tolerate or defend a nasty antisemite, it is only a matter of time before people begin to wonder if you are a nasty antisemite yourself.”  And as wise Ben Franklin observed, “He who lies down with dogs, shall rise up with fleas.”

Why are you scratching your head, Dr. Paul?

Hoooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Obama and The Bipartisan Fascists Attack Privacy and Capitalism

June 13, 2013

Once again, thanks to the voters who voted for Obama, Fascism is on the rise, reaching peaks it had not achieved since the days of Hitler and Mussolini. Its animosity towards Individuality and Privacy are well noted, and now the very people who put the Fascist Obama into the White House are cringing with fear as they realise that every intimate revelation, every minor misdemeanor, and every detail of their private lives, and business and financial transactions, have undoubtedly been stored and perhaps seen by one of the thousands of private contractor NSA financial snoopers. Soon all their medical history and conditions will also be up for blackmail, thanks to Obamacare. Capitalism and the free-market have been dealt a blow that they will probably never recover from. For Obama voters, and the rest of us, it’s too late.

Undoubtedly, many people will be blackmailed by NSA snoopers who now know intimate secrets about them. Their financial deals and trades, their sitting orders to buy or sell, can now be frontrun by NSA snoopers who can give this information to their friends, family, and business associates. The absolute necessity of Privacy to the conduct of the Free-Market has been forever destroyed by a coalition of Liberal Democrats like political commentator John Rothmann, who strongly supported Obama’s reelection, and Fascist Republicans like Lindsey “Cracker” Graham, who doesn’t mind that your Privacy has be destroyed.

However, the real criminals in this case are the people who voted for Obama over anti-Fascist choices like Congressman Ron Paul and Governor Gary Johnson. The Obama Voters have destroyed the Fourth Amendment, the inalienable Right to Privacy that Jefferson so well understood, and Free-Market Capitalism, all by sticking that stylus through the name of Barack Obama in the voting booth. The crimes that they have committed in their private lives and have put online in emails and social media are now stored on vast databanks, waiting to be used against them if they ever threaten the Fascist’s powerstructure. Thanks to their stupidity, faith in government, and lack of political science knowledge, the Obama voters have elevated the Fascist State to a new level of power.

The only benefit of all this is that now a vast swathe of the public has become deeply cynical about Collectivist Politics. They remember that Classical Liberals like Oregon’s Peter DeFazio, Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, who now are making such a big stink about their own privacy being invaded, were the very ones who only a few months ago were urging the people to reelect the Fascist Obama. And they continue to remain in the Fascistic Democratic Party, while the Republican Fascists actually are endorsing this heinous overthrow of the Bill of Rights under the Fascist Obama, showing that they haven’t changed much since the days of the Fascist Bush (the second one), save for the exception of Senator Rand Paul.

With a new Gallop Poll showing only 10% of the public think Congress is doing a good job, the only good news coming out of this is that there is a growing Libertarian revulsion amongst the public against the intrusions of the Fascist State against the Individual and his most intimate secrets. They now feel instinctively that Jefferson was right in saying that government is a necessary evil, but at heart an evil institution, and that its evil can only be kept in check when tied down by the Bill of Rights. But the Democratic Party politicians and voters have put an end to the Bill of Rights, now a part of past History.

The damage done to Privacy and Capitalism is irreparable. Thanks to the Obama Voters and the Bipartisan Fascist Politicians, Human Freedom has been destroyed in America.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

The 2016 Presidential Election: Senator Ted Cruz vs. Ms. Rodham

May 31, 2013

It’s hard to prognosticate on the course of events three years hence, but given their positions in their parties, and the strengths of their candidacies, Silverwolf thinks that the 2016 Presidential election will be between Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, and Hilary Rodham, sometimes girlfriend of former President Clinton. You’ve probably heard of them both.

Senator Cruz is so far out ahead of everybody else in the Republican Party, both in terms of intelligence and oratory, that his only opposition will come from Senator Paul and from a candidate set up by the Corporate Republicans, unless they also back Cruz.

Senator Paul, a cup of weak tea after the caffeine-drenched enthusiasm of his father’s campaigns, may have a chance as a candidate, but the intellectual brilliance of Cruz is lacking in his delivery. Paul, like his father, is above-average in intelligence, but he doesn’t have that razor-sharp thinking of lawyers like Cruz, Obama, and Clinton, who can come up with completed, polished sentences in their heads, and then spew them forth flawlessly, without all the verbal static we used to get from Ron Paul, even though that static made the public realize that Ron Paul was pretty much like them in his speaking habits, and the way his mind worked.

Ron Paul and Rand Paul’s genius, if you could call it that, is in getting the ideas and theory of Jeffersonian government and Capitalist Economics right — something that no other major politicians in modern American history have ever gotten right — and that puts them light-years ahead of almost any other politicians in America, save for a few sidelined Libertarians like Gov. Gary Johnson. And Rand, of course, is the pupil of his father’s ideas.

But when it comes to the terse, dynamic argument, set forth like a prosecuting attorney, Ted Cruz does it near-perfectly, and in a way that will convince the public in a few short minutes that he can fulfill the requirements of the Presidency. The people will feel like they have a Competent in charge of the Nation, not another lying crook who throws a teargas canister of words at the public to try to ward off all the unConstitutional and anti-Libertarian crimes that may have been committed.

Cruz will benefit also from the very work that Ron and Rand Paul have done in getting Libertarian ideas into the mainstream of American political thought. McCain called them “wacko-birds”, but he had to eat crow a few weeks later and “apologize” when he realized that those “wacko-birds” were merely repeating the words of Reagan, thirty years later, and those words still resonate very loudly in America, especially in light of the Obama Inflation, which has ground down into poverty about half of all Americans to the point where they cannot afford to eat, let alone pay for all the additional inflations that Obama, his debt-ballooning Democrats, and the Republican Corporate Socialists have brought to every product in America. And now, additionally, the elitist in the White House is going to throw Obamacare Premiums at them. How many Americans will die from heart failure due to the anxiety of how they are going to pay the huge insurance premium hikes any individual now trying to buy insurance will have to pay?

Ron Paul warned against this dire inflationary threat in 2007, and the voters could have put him in office and had their old consumer prices, which they could handle, but they chose instead to be brainwashed into voting for Obama, and now the lower and middle classes are starving.

There is a price to pay for letting yourself be brainwashed, and voting for an inflationary-Fascist Presidency and Congress.

Americans are paying that price every day, and that is why they will flock to someone like Ted Cruz. Ironically, the inflationary policies of the Left, the people who have never read the history of Rome, will eventually install Senator Cruz, and many of the ideas of Ron Paul,  in the White House.

However, this is only a prediction. The reader should not think this is a guarantee.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

 

Nix On the President: Richard Stinkhouse Obama

May 15, 2013

So he finally opened the door to the Fascist outhouse, and now all those cheering Liberals and champions of the President can smell that we were right and they were wrong when we warned the nation of the Fascist nature of President Obama. A man who could attend a church for 20 years that would give its Man of the Year award to the racist bigot, Louis Farrakhan, was certainly not fit to be President. And now the entire public, and the President’s own defenders can see why.

President Obama’s assault on Press Freedom may come as a surprise to modern Democrats in 2013, but it would have been no surprise to Thomas Jefferson, or those inflamers of the desire for Liberty, John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, the authors of the famous “Cato’s Letters” that both aroused and instructed the American colonists against Tyranny.

In those “Letters”, Trenchard and Gordon wrote, ” We know, by infinite Examples and Experience, that Men possessed of Power, rather than part with it, will do anything, even the worst and the blackest, to keep it, and scarce ever a Man upon Earth when out of it as long as he could carry every Thing his own way in it…”

“It is the Nature of Power to be ever encroaching, and converting every extraordinary Power, granted at particular Times, and upon particular Occasions, into an ordinary power, to be used at all Times, and when there is no Occasion, nor does it ever part willingly with any Advantage…” (Page Obama and Holder)

“Alas! Power encroaches daily on Liberty, with a success too evident; and the Balance between them is almost lost. Tyranny has engrossed almost the whole Earth, and striking at Mankind Root and Branch, makes the World a Slaughterhouse, and will certainly go on to destroy, till it is either destroyed itself, or, which is more likely, has left nothing else to destroy.”

No gullible believers, like the bulk of the modern American Public, these 18th century Libertarians knew that government is not a friendly neighborhood grocer, but a necessary evil full of power-hungry men who must be bound down by the chains of a Constitution and Bill of Rights. They knew the types of President Obama and Attorney General Holder very well, a quarter of a millenium ago.

Ron Paul and legal scholar Jonathan Turley have long warned against the encroachments on Liberty of the current administration, but Liberal Democrats have ignored these warnings and abuses, and have continued to support the President up to the current time. Now they, and the Public, can see what an individual they have put into power, and it is primarily their responsibility to control and even impeach him if he attempts any further outrageous crimes against Press Freedom.

But it’s good news for the Fascists: Nixon is back!

Hoooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww

Enviro-Libertarianism: A New Necessary Political Outlook

December 7, 2012

It seems to Silverwolf that what the world and the West and especially America really needs is a new political movement which he would call “Enviro-Libertarianism”, a combination of the Libertarian maxim that 1) no person or group of persons may aggress against the Property Rights of any other person (including their own body which Libertarianism also regards as a Property Right) and 2) the principle that, as Ron Paul has said, no one has the right to pollute the air you breathe or the water you drink.

Silverwolf thinks that without bringing together the twin outlooks of a Jeffersonian-minarchist, radically free-market, Capitalism, and the environmental safeguards that would protect Individuals and their property, and indeed the whole planet and its animals, against the gross environmental pollution of the earth that has gone on for decades and is now accelerating beyond the Fail-Safe point, — yea, without this critical synthesis, there will be an envionmental chaos that will wipe out the human species. Only a merging of the Libertarian Philosophy of respect for the Individual and the sacredness of his Rights, magnificently codified by Wisechief Jefferson in the Bill of Rights, and the sane responsibility of the Environmental movement, that loves the earth and its animals trees and wants to preserve this miraculous paradise for future humans instead of raping it to benefit those corporations and their stockholders in bed with big government all over the world — only this merger will save both the planet, Capitalism, and Jeffersonian Republicanism.

Murray Rothbard pointed out that when private interests own resources like copper or timber in a truly free-market, they have to ration their annual harvest if they want their business enterprise to be self-sustaining, say for a hundred years, but when government controls huge swathes of resource-rich land and is in bed with major corporations, like the timber industry, and sells those resources to the corporations at below market prices, it encourages those industries they do business with to take as much as they can in as short a time as they can without regard to further sustainability. And so we have gross clearcuts all over the West with so-called Liberal Democrats like Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) calling for even bigger forest rapes or “thinnings”, with the “lumber” going to totalitarian Communist China. The Northwest Forests of America are being decimated by so-called Liberal Democrats like Peter DeFazio, Senators Jeff Merkley and Ron Wyden, and Governor John Kitzhaber, who have increased the cutting of the Forests in the past years under Democrat Obama, and who stand by and permit the dumping of thousands of pounds of toxic herbicides and pesticides on the forests in populated areas full of children. And think of all the innocent critters, birds and lil rascal varmints whose playgrounds and bliss have been wiped out by the collusion of DeFazio, Merkley, Wyden, Obama and Kitzhaber with the timber industry against the sacred Earth. They are destroying your Earth instead of defending it.

And this decimation of the forests is going on at exactly the same time that they and their fellow Democrats bleat their call for a carbon-tax that will come out of the pockets of the little guy, not the big logging interests.

Now tell me, Congressman DeFazio, if it is so important to institute a carbon-tax because the world is so close to the brink of destruction from global warming, then why is is alright to cut even one single tree if, as we have been told countless times, trees are carbon banks that store excess carbon-dioxide as they grow, only releasing it when they die and decay. The glaring contradiction and hypocrisy of these Forest Rapists is very clear.

Gee, Congressman DeFazio, if our environment is that fragile now that we need to be taxed, then why not call for an immediate logging moratorium on Federal lands, say for 30 years? Why is a tax crucial, but destroying even more carbon banks in the form of trees is not crucial? If global warming is real, that logging moratorium might make the whole difference in the planet and its inhabitants surviving. If global warming is not real, and the earth re-cools, and with 30 years of unmolested growth rebuilding some of the desecrated areas of the Forest, then perhaps commercial logging on private lands could be resumed if there were still any demand by then for wood as a construction material.

These fracking Congressional Democrats, in collusion with their blood brothers, the fracking Republicans, are destroying this miraculous planet and its miraculous life with their eternal bleat of “jobs” while they pick up their $150 grand-a-year for moving their lips and showering, these People’s Representatives who make 3.75 times approximately what the Average Adjusted Gross Income is for all Americans. Some “Evermans”, huh, these Senators and Congressmen and Presidents and Governors. Only Congressman Ron Paul had the integrity to pledge that he would only accept the Average AGI as his Presidential salary, in a wonderful gesture that illustrated the point that the President is not above the People but serves at the Will of the People. No more Emperor Nixons, thank you.

Sadly, the Green parties throughout the world seem to always side with the Left, or Liberal Democrat regimes and administrations, not realizing that Socialism and Central Planning is disastrous for a society and will always lead to poverty, as one sees in so many of Obama’s and Cardinal Geithner’s various financial and medical insurance schemes. In Australia the Greens side with that sadist and racist, Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of a country that stole its land from the Aborigines, and now won’t let in a few Tamils fleeing the horrendous human rights record of Sri Lanka, Muslim asylum seekers from Burma, and others fleeing Iran and Iraq, into a vast land the size of America which could easily absorb a few thousand more refugees. In America, the border cities are stuffed with so-called “illegal immigrants” by the hundreds of thousands and millions, but things don’t fall apart and go along pretty smoothly. Haven’t heard of any armed uprisings in L.A. by a “Mexican Liberation Front Army”, have you?. But fragile Australia can’t house a few thousand extremely brave immigrants, or let them go about on conditional release within the community, and instead keeps them in virtual prison camps offshore, living in horrendous conditions (tents in the rain that leak) as was recently reported on Radio Australia. Prime Minister Julia Gillard is a disgrace to Australia, a disgrace to the Libertarian tradition of British Liberalism which was one of the bright spots of the British Commonwealth, at least in theory, and, finally, a disgrace to the Human Race. Western Liberal Governments should step up and criticise this Harridan most harshly. Shame on Australia for its disgraceful and cruel treatment of these brave Human Beings

But I run before my horse to market.

The Green Parties, unfortunately, in Europe, in Australia, and in America invariably side with the Left. And, unfortunately, the Libertarian Party has failed to distinguish between what we would call “Corporate Libertarianism” which attempts to equate the Rights of Corporations with those of Individuals, and “Individual Libertarianism” which was the original concept of Jefferson and was most recently championed by Professor Murray Rothbard when he founded the modern Libertarian Party. Rothbard’s later severe break with the Koch Brothers perfectly illustrates the clear dichotomy between these two views, Individual Libertarianism vs Corporate Libertarianism. Whereas our Constitution speaks of “Individual Rights”, it makes no mention of Corporations whatsoever. Corporations were a cunning, but necessary, later invention, but in today’s political climate it is absolutely essential to distinguish between the Rights of Corporations and the Rights of Individuals, and it is the Rights of Individuals which must be put on top.

The Democrats and Republicans have reversed this natural order, putting the Corporation above the Individual, and this perversion of Jefferson’s intent in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights must be re-reversed.

Indeed, we’d put it to you that “Corporate Libertarianism” is not Libertarianism at all, but actually its opposite if you look at how it works in America and abroad. It’s a form of the old Mercantilism of the British Kings who would give the plum monopolies to their friends, relatives, and fawning minions.

So, the point is that Environmentalism must be linked with the Individual Libertarianism that seemed to animate Rothbard, and not with the Corporate Libertarianism which is the main braying call of the mainstream Republicans. Ron Paul represented such an Individual Rothbardian Libertarianism in our view.

Today’s news of a huge fall of one-third in the sperm count and quality in French males  in the past 30 years is a confirmation of the continuing domination of the corporations as they pollute the Earth and its People, and that sperm count fall in France, of course, mainly took place under the enlightened “progressive Left-wing’ French government in Europe, that stronghold of the Greens. We can see how well the Greens are protecting the Environment and the Earth and its People.

The only thing that will save the World now is a radical Environmentalism, that treats environmental polluters the way you’d treat rapists, married to a radically free-market Libertarianism, that takes the defense of the Individual’s Property Rights, including his body, as the only legitimate function of government.

Without this marriage the world is doomed.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

America’s Latest Great Tragedy: The Reelection of President Obama

November 7, 2012

The reelection of President Obama is a great tragedy for millions and millions of working and middle class Americans, whose lives will be further ravaged by the Obama Inflation in consumer goods, while many assets will continue to depress: the old Stagflation of the Carter years only greater in magnitude. The poor President has no idea of Economics, and approaches everything from a Collectivist ideology, instead of the Classical Liberalism that was the best of Olde England, and which was transplanted to America by Jefferson and a few of his cohorts. Economics must be approached from the standpoint of Human Rights or Natural Rights, and Jefferson said we have a Inalienable Right to Pursue Happiness, which, in all previous documents of its kind, had read “Right to Property” (i.e. ‘ a Right to Life, Liberty, and Property”). So, when the President engages in his wealth extortion from Individual Citizens, which he transfers to three groups: the welfare recipients,  the corporate wealthy who back him (i.e. Solyndra and Obama’s Senate vote for the bank bailout bill), and the government workers and bureaucrats who now average $100k a year plus healthcare plus pension all sucked out of the private sector, — when he caters to these three groups, he is violating those very Rights to which Jefferson said we have an inalienable Right. This is Communism in action, though it may be called Socialism, Social Democracy, National Socialism (Nazism), or Liberal American Democracy. They’re all at heart Communism, which might have seemed justifiable in the pre-Industrial age, prior to the Industrial Revolution, or even at the end of that Revolution, when wealth disparity appeared so large. But now we are in an age when technology and robots could, with a free power source like solar, produce huge amounts of consumer goods for very little labor or imput from the final recipients of those commodities. What keeps the mass of men poor is Socialism of the Democrat’s Obama kind with its associated constant inflation, as well as the Bush Republican-spendthrift kind. Contrarywise, if we had a radically free-market Capitalism with very low taxes and no income or estate taxes to kill initiative, then that Capitalism would produce enough wealth to satisfy anyone who could find a useful and interesting niche in a society that would constantly evolve new demands for labor services and physical products. With no income tax to dampen donations, effective charities staffed by dedicated workers could care for the completely disabled instead of the callous and horrendous government welfare bureaucracies.

It’s the ignorance and stupidity of most of the population on Economics and Political Science that is the real tragedy in America, and this last election shows that it will be only after yet another economic catastrophe that an ignorant populace will wake up and sober and there can be any hope of change in America. The fact that women and young people overwhelmingly voted for Obama shows that Democracy is out of control in America, and no matter how logically the economic arguments are presented to the people, those key Socialist groups who keep persistently voting in a “Liberal”, and will continue to immorally overlook his drone murders of children in Pakistan and Afghanistan and the NDAA overthrow of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, because Obama fulfills their own particular “Liberal” group’s demands on one particular issue. Liberalism used to be associated with deep Morality. No longer.

The only silver lining in this is that Governor Romney didn’t win. In many ways he might have been a far worse Fascist than Obama will be, but economically for most Americans he probably would have been less harmful. Judging which of two fatal diseases will kill you first is hard.

The great tragedy of this election is that Gary Johnson, and/or Ron Paul did not get elected. They had the Philosophy that this country desperately needs, like a dying man in the Mojave needs a jigger of water. They were the apostles of free-market Capitalism, Ron Paul more pure in his Libertarian Philosophy, Gary Johnson more sane on foreign policy. Both would have made superlative Presidents, instead of the two Mediocrities that were picked for the public to fight over. What a waste of time and money these two Politicians have engendered, never dealing with one real issue, while Paul’s and Johnson’s speeches would usually touch on a dozen.

The American Public will learn in the next four years that Stagflation is not just a dead buck that has been lying in the hot forest for three days, and that the stink is far worse. They voted for Middle Class Poverty and they will get it.

And perhaps the putrid Republican Party, that treated its most forward looking apostle, Ron Paul, like a pariah, will learn the lesson that it cannot win the Presidency without the Libertarians. Governor Gary Johnson received over 1 million votes, and though we haven’t seen the final totals on the Presidentical race, we’d bet his votes would have put George Romney’s son over the top in at least the popular vote, further showing what a joke is the claim that America is a “democratic” state. Indeed, Obama was put in power once again by about one-quarter of the American eligible voters. That’s what they call “Democracy” and name their party after.

Silverwolf is sorry America will experience such dire economic straits during the next four years, thanks to the re-election of Obama and the Senate Democrats, but there are consequences to actions. Perhaps the reaction to the suffering that the voters who didn’t vote for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, or who didn’t even bother to vote at all, letting the Fascists just dance into office unmolested, — perhaps that reaction in four years time will finally propel a Libertarian, Bill of Rights, Free-Market, Individual Laissez-Faire Capitalist into the White House, and America can finally, after 250 years, start to be the Free, prosperous society it could be under Individualist Capitalism and the U.S. Constitution. Until the next election, the people will have to rot and putrify in the cesspool of the Democrats instead of the cesspool of the Republicans.

The once-great America — R.I.P.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww — Silverwolf

Fascist vs. Fascist vs. Gary Johnson

September 10, 2012

So the election, as Silverwolf could see on May 17th, when he mailed in his re-registration going from a Republican (thankfully briefly) back to a Libertarian, — the election was going to come down to a contest between the two Fascists and Gary Johnson, and that is just what we have in September. Two milquetoast Fascist candidates, representing the two largest parties in America, and Gary Johnson, representing the Jeffersonian-Libertarian pro-Capitalist people in America, many of whom were formerly supporting Congressman Ron Paul’s candidacy.

Now, one may think Silverwolf exaggerateth when he calleth the brethren “two Fascists”, for Fascist conjures up the image of a jacketbooted thug dressed in State Black or Brown, laying into a protestor with his baton before having him sent to a concentration camp, or that strutting jackanapes Mussolini, who finally met a just end, giving one of his histrionic orations. But technically the term is accurate, because it’s founder, moosejaw Benito, defined Fascism as “corporatism”, or an alliance between the State and the major corporations (or all corporations) within the State. The bailouts of GM and AIG and the banks that were failing, and the Solyndra half-billion dollar rip-off, are textbook examples.

So calling Obama and Romney “Fascists” is accurate, although it may not involve the actual horrendous Civil Rights violations that were perpetraited under the European Fascists before and during World War II. Still, Obama is still arming the Indonesian Army Government Death Squads that murder, torture, and terrorize the populace of Papua. Radio Australia and the A.B.C. (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) have recently done some excellent documentaries on the murder of Papuan non-violent political activists, funded by that trio of moral bankrupts, President Obama, Julia Gillard, and former British PM Gordon Brown. These three were and are (we don’t know if PM David Cameron is continuing this vile policy) confiscating their taxpayer’s money to fund a reign of terror in Papua, in effect turning every taxpayer and every silent citizen in these countries into an accessory to murder. (And notice they are all “Liberals” in the current American sense of that word.)

You could have bet Obama would gang up on the defenseless peasants of Papua to curry favor with the immoral Indonesian Government. Anything for a buck over principles with that sort of politician, just as he’s done in Red China where the reign of terror and cultural genocide continues in Tibet, with the blessings and tolerance of the Prez and Ms. Rodham-Clinton. How can the American people vote in such enablers of terror?

With Romney, we already know that he is going to emulate the “Liberal Republican” views of his father as far as the Fascistic wedding between government and business. And on assaulting Civil Rights, Romney could well outdo the shameful Obama record. Either way it will be an Imperial Presidency and four more years of the Degeneration of America.

The one alternative for Libertarian-oriented Americans is former Govenor Gary Johnson of New Mexico. While no Ron Paul, he’s close and congruent to many and most of Ron Paul’s positions, and the experience of being Governor of a State for eight years means he could move into the White House with a certain ease. Americans like Governors who have governed well, and Johnson, a Libertarian-Republican or the other way around, was elected and reelected in a state that is heavily Democratic in registration.

An informal survey of 1,000 former Ron Paul supporters was very recently conducted by one of the Daily Paul’s fixture bloggers. (The Daily Paul is a website that has been running during Ron Paul’s campaign for several years. It is a locus point for news, clips, and views on the campaign which is now kaput.) This survey found that 66% of the thousand respondents were going to vote for Gary Johnson, as is Silverwolf, 16% were going to write in Ron Paul, even though they thought their vote would not be counted or attributed to Dr. Paul (i.e. “others” in the polling totals), and only 6% said they’d vote for Romney.

About a month back, a political observer for the Libertarian magazine, Reason, was predicting that a third of the Ron Paul vote would go to Johnson and the other two-thirds to Romney. We thought this was well off the mark, as we felt, from reading the mood, that Johnson would pick up two-thirds of Dr. Paul’s votes, since their policies were so similar at core, with one-third going to Romney in a “stop Obama” or “the lesser of two evils” justification. Looks like Silverwolf got the latter part of that call wrong. The 6% only going to Romney has nasty implications for his electoral chances. As we said in our last blog, dissing Ron Paul and his supporters at the convention, when they were treated like dirt, could well cost Romney the election. Romney blew his chance at winning outright two months in advance of the election when he dissed the Ron Paul movement. Some chess players like to turn won games into losses.

So that’s your choice. A Fascist versus another Fascist versus Governor Gary Johnson.

You pays your money, you takes your choice.

Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf

Libertarianism: Individual vs. Corporate

June 22, 2012

Silverwolf believes there is a necessary distinction that needs to be made when one bandies about the term “Libertarian”; a distinction that is often blurred over. There are two views of Libertarianism: the Individual view and the corporate view. The Individual view is represented largely by the thought of Ron Paul, who has pointed out that Corporatism fundamentally runs the Federal Government and is the essence of Fascism according to its founder, War Criminal Mussolini, and the corporate view, which is largely represented by the remainder of the Republican Party, which is that Corporations are Individuals. It is the Mises Institute in contrast to the Cato Institute. It is a battle pitting the Individual against the Collective.

One of the necessities in our law that needs correcting, which Ron Paul has also pointed out, is the absurdity of the Supreme Court rulings that place the corporation on the same level as the Individual. This fabricated equality, nowhere present in our Constitution, which is a paean of praise to Individual Rights, must be overturned in Law even if it means impeaching Supreme Court Justices or Chief Justices. Mitt Romney says “Corporations are people.” Ron Paul says, “Individuals are people.”

Now lets examine the “corporation”. First of all, it is a notional concept, not a being in reality. A corporation is not an Individual; it is a Collectivist entity — basically a gang of Capitalists, with special legal advantages and usually lower-than-individual income tax rates, who are ganging up against Individual Capitalists. This Collectivist entity should have no special privileges; nay, on the contrary, it is the Individual who should always come before this Collectivist entity.

Silverwolf sees that the main body of the Republican Party is now, with the Romney nomination in the bag, shifting towards this Corporate Collectivism, and, unfortunately, Gary Johnson too has many Corporate ideas that should be anathema to Individualistic Libertarianism, like school vouchers that will subsidize private school profits, and privatizing prisons, which seems like a green light for prisoner abuse without legal recourse, justified by the usual cost-savings arguments of the Pragmatists, and even a zero income tax for corporations.  Now, Silverwolf opposes the Individual income tax and the Estate and inheritance taxes, both Federal and State, based on the Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, but he sees nothing in the Constitution that forbids the taxation of a Collectivist entity known as the Corporation. This income tax could be tailored to exclude small businesses and individuals who want to take advantage of the liability advantages of incorporating, perhaps starting at a $5 million AGI, so that only really large, affluent corporations would be subject to the income tax. Perhaps this tax, in combination with Constitutional limited government would be all that was necessary to fund the Federal Budget, and once the U.S. budget deficit and Federal debt have been erased and effaced from the surface of the earth, then the corporations can also have a zero tax rate, or near zero if there were no other tax sources such as, for example, an excise tax on products from Fascist dictatorships like Red China, Indonesia, and Iran.

Still, despite his shortcomings, Gary Johnson will be the necessary choice for Libertarians and Ron Paul Republicans because voting for Romney or Obama will leave blood on your hands. When voting for evil will mean someone innocent gets murdered, vote for the neutral but moral choice, even if you think it is a sure loser. At least you will not be directly complicit in Immorality. You won’t have blood on your hands, and perhaps that is the most important fact when you’re coming out of the voting booth.

Silverwolf believes that true Libertarianism should always stress the Individual, which is a Reality, and not the Corporation, which is a notional nothingness masquerading as an Individual Reality. The Republicans and Democrats will constantly try to blur this distinction, as will those “Cato” Libertarians who are gung-ho on the Corporations. Usually because they own lots of stock in them.

If we are to have collective security, we must defend the Rights of the Individual over and above those of the Collective. This is one of the cornerstones of Libertarianism, without which so-called Corporate Libertarianism would soon be indistinguishable from Fascism, as it is in America where Obama is letting the Corporate frackers destroy thousands of Individual’s properties by ruining their water supplies. This is the quality of Obama’s “environmentalism”, about equal to the quality of the homesteader’s polluted well. Environmentalism and Libertarianism share a common goal: defending the Individual against Property Rights Aggressions from other men or groups of men. The groups of men are often now called “Corporations”.

Face it, it has come down to the Individual and the Earth ranged against the Corporate might of the Democratic and Republican Parties. If Man and Life on Earth are not to perish, the Individual must win out.

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww! — Silverwolf